Shrinking Money and the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy
Money is shrinking. The money supply (M1) in the United States, as a fraction of the nominal value of GDP, has decreased about 70 per cent since 1952. Money has shrunk because the demand for money has fallen. Technological progress in the development of alternative means of payment, such as electronic payment systems, increased credit availability, and new cash management techniques have reduced the relative quantities of transactions measures of money held by households and businesses. Moreover, financial innovation is likely to continue, which suggests that money will become even less important as a medium of exchange in the future.
KeywordsInterest Rate Monetary Policy Money Supply Intermediate Good Money Demand
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanchard, O.-J. and N. Kiyotaki (1987), Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand, American Economic Review 77, 647–66.Google Scholar
- Christiano, L.J. (1991), Modeling the Liquidity Effect of a Money Shock, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 15, 3–34.Google Scholar
- Christiano, L.J. and M. Eichenbaum (1992), Liquidity Effects and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism, American Economic Review 82, 346–353.Google Scholar
- Cole, H.L. and L.E. Ohanian (1999), The Demand for Money and the Nonneutrality of Money, Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- Sims, C.A. (1996), Comments on Glenn Rudebusch’s ‘Do Measures of Monetary Policy Make Sense?’, Discussion Paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J.B. (1979), Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model, American Economic Review 69, 108–13.Google Scholar