Feedback Control of Uncertain Systems

  • Geir E. Dullerud
  • Fernando Paganini
Part of the Texts in Applied Mathematics book series (TAM, volume 36)

Abstract

In this chapter we bring together the separate threads of synthesis of feedback controllers in the absence of uncertainty, and analysis of uncertain systems, into a common problem involving both uncertainty and control. This problem is represented by the diagram shown in Figure 9.1, where G is the generalized plant as in earlier chapters, but now also describes dependence on system uncertainty. The perturbation Δ belongs to a structured ball, and K represents the controller.

Keywords

Feedback Control Robust Stability Uncertain System Robust Performance State Space System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. [183]
    G. Zames. On the input-output stability of time varying nonlinear feedback systems. Part I: Conditions derived using concepts of loop gain, conicity, and positivity. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11: 228–238, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [124]
    V. M. Popov. On the absolute stability of nonlinear systems of automatic control. Automation and Remote Control, 22: 857–875, 1961.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [176]
    V. A. Yakubovich. Frequency conditions for the absolute stability of control systems with several nonlinear or linear nonstationary units. Automat. Telemech., pages 5–30, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. [34]
    C.A. Desoer and M. Vidyasagar. Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties. Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. [172]
    J.C. Willems. The Analysis of Feedback Systems. MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. [138]
    M. G. Safonov and M. Athans. A multiloop generalization of the circle criterion for stability margin analysis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26: 415–422, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [147]
    J.S. Shamma. The necessity of the small-gain theorem for time-varying and nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36: 1138 1147, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [89]
    M. Khammash and J. B. Pearson. Performance robustness of discrete-time systems with structured uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36: 398–412, 1991.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [101]
    A. Megretski. Necessary and sufficient conditions of stability: A multi-loop generalization of the circle criterion. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38: 753–756, 1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [148]
    J.S. Shamma. Robust stability with time varying structured uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39: 714–724, 1994.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [41]
    J. C. Doyle, J. E. Wall, and G. Stein. Performance and robustness analysis for structured uncertainty. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. [43]
    J.C. Doyle. Structured uncertainty in control system design. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. [139]
    M. G. Safonov and R.Y. Chiang. Real/complex K m synthesis without curve fitting. In Control and Dynamic Systems; editor C. T. Leondes. Academic Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. [114]
    A. Packard, K. Zhou, P. Pandey, J. Leonhardson, and G. Balas. Optimal, constant I/O similarity scaling for full-information and state-feedback control problems. Systems and Control Letters, 19: 271–280, 1992.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [130]
    A. Rantzer and A. Megretski. A convex parameterization of robustly stabilizing controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39: 1802–1808, 1994.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [30]
    R. D’Andrea. Generalized £2 synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44: 1145–1156, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [186]
    G. Zames and J. G. Owen. Duality theory for MIMO robust disturbance rejection. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38:743–752., 1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [110]
    J. G. Owen and G. Zames. Duality theory for robust disturbance attenuation. Automatica, 29: 695–705, 1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [104]
    M. Mesbahi, M.G. Safonov, and G.P. Papavassilopoulos. Bilinearity and complementarity in robust control. In Recent Advances on LMI Methods in Control; editors L. El Ghaoui, S. Niculescu. SIAM, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geir E. Dullerud
    • 1
  • Fernando Paganini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations