# Mathematical Programming in Engineering Mechanics: Some Current Problems

Chapter

## Abstract

The application of mathematical programming methods in a variety of practically motivated engineering mechanics problems provides a fertile field for interdisciplinary interaction between the mathematical programming and engineering communities. This paper briefly outlines several topical problems in engineering mechanics involving the use of mathematical programming techniques. The intention is to attract the attention of mathematical programming experts to some of the still open questions in the intersection of the two fields.

## Keywords

Complementarity Problem Linear Complementarity Problem Mathematical Program With Equilibrium Constraint Mathematical Programming Method Cohesive Crack Model
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]M.Z. Cohn and G. Maier (eds.),
*Engineering Plasticity by Mathematical Programming*, NATO Advanced Study Institute, University of Waterloo 1977, Pergamon Press, New York, 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [2]G. Maier and J. Munro, Mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis,
*Applied Mechanics Reviews***35**, 1982, 1631–1643.Google Scholar - [3]G. Maier and D. Lloyd Smith, Update to “Mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis”,
*ASME Applied Mechanics Update*, 1985, 377–383.Google Scholar - [4]M.C. Ferris and J.S. Pang, Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems,
*SIAM Review***39**, 1997, 669–713.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [5]M.C. Ferris and J.S. Pang (eds.),
*Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art*, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [6]V. Carvelli,
*Limit and Shakedown Analysis of Three-Dimensional Structures and Periodic Heterogeneous Materials*, Ph.D. Thesis, Po-litecnico di Milano, 1999.Google Scholar - [7]Y.G. Zhang and M.W. Lu, An algorithm for plastic limit analysis,
*Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering***126**, 1995, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [8]J. Lubliner,
*Plasticity Theory*, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [9]A. Capsoni and L. Corradi, A finite element formulation of the rigid-plastic limit analysis problem,
*International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering***40**, 1997, 2063–2086.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [10]A. Corigliano, G. Maier and S. Pycko, Dynamic shakedown analysis and bounds for elastoplastic structures with nonassociative, internal variable constitutive laws,
*International Journal of Solids and Structures***32**, 1995, 3145–3166.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]C. Polizzotto, A unified treatment of shakedown theory and related bounding techniques,
*Solid Mechanics Archives***7**, 1982, 19–75.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [12]F. Tin-Loi, Deflection bounding at shakedown,
*Proceedings ASCE, Journal of Structural Division***106**, 1980, 1209–1215.Google Scholar - [13]C. Comi, G. Maier and U. Perego, Generalized variable finite element modeling and extremum theorems in stepwise holonomic elastoplasticity with internal variables,
*Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering***96**, 1992, 213–237.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [14]I. Kaneko, On some recent engineering applications of complementarity problems,
*Mathematical Programming Study***17**, 1982, 111–125.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [15]G. Maier, A matrix structural theory of piecewise linear plasticity with interacting yield planes,
*Meccanica***5**, 1970, 55–66.Google Scholar - [16]G. Cocchetti and G. Maier, Static shakedown theorems in piecewise linearized poroplasticity,
*Archive of Applied Mechanics***68**, 1998, 651–661.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [17]R.W. Lewis and B.A. Schrefler,
*The Finite Element Method in the Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media*, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1998.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [18]G. Bolzon, D. Ghilotti and G. Maier, Parameter identification of the cohesive crack model, in
*Material Identification Using Mixed Numerical Experimental Methods*(H. Sol and C.W.J. Oomens, eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [19]G. Bolzon, G. Maier and F. Tin-Loi, On multiplicity of solutions in quasi-brittle fracture computations,
*Computational Mechanics***19**, 1997, 511–516.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [20]G. Bolzon, G. Maier and G. Novati, Some aspects of quasi-brittle fracture analysis as a linear complementarity problem, in
*Fracture and Damage in Quasibrittle Structures*(Z.P. Bažant, Z. Bittnar, M. Jirásek and J. Mazars, eds.), E&FN Spon, London, 1994, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar - [21]G. Bolzon, G. Maier and F. Tin-Loi, F. Holonomic and nonholo-nomic simulations of quasi-brittle fracture: a comparative study of mathematical programming approaches, in
*Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures*(F.H. Wittmann, ed.), Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, 1995, pp. 885–898.Google Scholar - [22]F. Tin-Loi and M.C. Ferris, Holonomic analysis of quasibrittle fracture with nonlinear softening, in
*Advances in Fracture Research*(B.L. Karihaloo, Y.W. Mai, M.I. Ripley and R.O. Ritchie, eds.), Pergamon Press, 1997, pp. 2183–2190.Google Scholar - [23]G. Bolzon and G. Maier, Identification of cohesive crack models for concrete on the basis of three-point-bending tests, in
*Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures*(R. de Borst, N. Bicanic, H. Mang and G. Meschke, eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998, pp. 301–310Google Scholar - [24]R.W. Cottle, J.S. Pang and R.E. Stone,
*The Linear Complementarity Problem*, Academic Press, 1992.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [25]Z. Cen and G. Maier, Bifurcations and instabilities in fracture of cohesive-softening structures: a boundary element analysis,
*Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures***15**, 1992, 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [26]G. Maier, G. Novati and Z. Cen, Symmetric Galerkin boundary element method for quasi-brittle fracture and frictional contact problems,
*Computational Mechanics***13**, 1993, 74–89.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [27]G. Bolzon, Hybrid finite element approach to quasi-brittle fracture,
*Computers and Structures***60**, 1996, 733–741.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [28]J.J. Judice and G. Mitra, An enumerative method for the solution of linear complementarity problems,
*European Journal of Operations Research***36**, 1988, 122–128.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [29]S.P. Dirkse and M.C. Ferris, The PATH solver: a non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems,
*Optimization Methods & Soßware***5**, 1995, 123–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [30]A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus and R. Raman,
*GAMS: A User’s Guide*, Gams Development Corporation, Washington, DC 20007, 1998.Google Scholar - [31]M.C. Ferris and T.S. Munson, Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver,
*Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control***24**, 2000, 165–188.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [32]Z.Q. Luo, J.S. Pang and D. Ralph,
*Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints*, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [33]D.E. Goldberg,
*Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning*, Addison-Wesley, 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [34]G. Maier, Inverse problem in engineering plasticity: a quadratic programming approach,
*Academia Nazionale dei Lincei*, Serie VIII, vol LXX, 1981, 203–209.Google Scholar - [35]G. Maier, F. Giannessi and A. Nappi, Indirect identification of yield limits by mathematical programming,
*Engineering Structures***4**, 1982, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [36]A. Nappi, System identification for yield limits and hardening moduli in discrete elastic-plastic structures by nonlinear programming,
*Applied Mathematical Modelling***6**, 1982, 441–448.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [37]H. Jiang, D. Ralph and F. Tin-Loi, Identification of yield limits as a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints, in
*Proceedings, 15th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials*(*ACMSM15*) (R.H. Grzebieta, R. Al-Mahaidi and J.L. Wilson, eds.), Balkema, 1997, pp. 399–404.Google Scholar - [38]D. Ralph, A piecewise sequential quadratic programming method for mathematical programs with linear complementarity constraints, in
*Proceedings, 7th Conference on Computational Tech-niques and Applications*(*CTAC95*) (A. Easton and R. May, eds.), World Scientific Press, 1995, pp. 663–668.Google Scholar - [39]F. Tin-Loi and M.C. Ferris, A simple mathematical programming method to a structural identification problem, in
*Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering*(*ICCCBE-VII*) (C.K. Choi, C.B. Yun and H.G. Kwak, eds.), Techno-Press, 1997, pp. 511–518.Google Scholar - [40]F. Facchinei, H. Jiang and L. Qi, A smoothing method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints,
*Mathematical Programming*85, 1999, 107–134.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [41]C. Kanzow, Some noninterior continuation methods for linear complementarity problems,
*SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications***17**, 1996, 851–868.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [42]M.C. Ferris and F. Tin-Loi, Nonlinear programming approach for a class of inverse problems in elastoplasticity,
*Structural Engineering and Mechanics*6, 1998, 857–870.Google Scholar - [43]H. Jiang and D. Ralph, Smooth SQP methods for mathematical programs with nonlinear complementarity constraints, Research Report, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, 1998.Google Scholar
- [44]L.D. Davis,
*Handbook of Genetic Algorithms*, Van Nostrand Rein-hold, New York, 1991.Google Scholar - [45]S. Bittanti, G. Maier and Nappi, Inverse problems in structural elastoplasticity: a Kaiman filter approach, in
*Plasticity Today*(A. Sawczuk and G. Bianchi, eds.), Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, 1993, pp. 311–329.Google Scholar - [46]S.P. Dirkse and M.C. Ferris, Modeling and solution environments for MPEC: GAMS & MATLAB, in
*Reformulation: Nons-mooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods*(M. Fukushima and L. Qi, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp. 127–148.Google Scholar - [47]A. Drud, CONOPT — a large-scale GRG code,
*ORSA Journal on Computing***6**, 1994, 207–216.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001