Support to the Multiattribute Decision Process

  • Oleg I. Larichev
  • David L. Olson


Multicriteria siting choice and particularly siting waste disposal facilities are very difficult decisions. This book reviewed some of the approaches used across the world to help make these difficult decisions on the basis of more thorough consideration of inevitably conflicting criteria and of inevitably conflicting groups. Four representative applications were presented, and the decision processes as well as group interactions involved were discussed.


Geographic Information System Yamal Peninsula Multiattribute Utility Multiple Criterion Analysis Multiattribute Decision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armistead, T.E., Yucca Mountain boring begins. Engineering News Record, vol. 240, no. 16, 1998, 16.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J., Rational choice functions and orderings. Economics vol. 26, 1959,121–127.Google Scholar
  3. Berkeley, D., Humphreys, P., Larichev, O., and Moshkovich, H. Aiding strategic decision making: Derivation and development of ASTRIDA. In Y. Vecsenyi and H. Sol, eds., Environment for Supporting Decision Processes, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. Dyer, J., Edmunds, T., Butler, J.C., and Jia, J. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Operations Research vol. 46, no. 6, 1998, 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Keeney, R.L. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Kunreuther, H.C., Linnerooth, J., Lathrop, J., Atz, H., Macgill, S., Mandl, C, Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. Risk Analysis and Decision Processes: The Siting of Liquified Energy Gas Facilities in Four Countries. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Olson, D.L. Multiobjective programming as a means of generating decisions. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, JAI Press, vol., 6, 1995, 273–290.Google Scholar
  8. Preston, M., Locals disagree on nuclear dump. American City & County, vol., 114, no. 2,1999, 12.Google Scholar
  9. Schuler, J.F., Jr., Nuclear waste’s slow boil. Public Utilities Fortnightly, vol. 137, no. 11, 1999, 34–37.Google Scholar
  10. Sen, A., Social choice theory: A re-examination. Econometrica, vol. 45, no. 1,1977,53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sen, A. Choice, Welfare, and Measurement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oleg I. Larichev
    • 1
  • David L. Olson
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations