Skip to main content

Methods and Decision Processes: Descriptive and Normative

  • Chapter
Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems

Abstract

How are large-scale siting decisions made in practice? H. Kunreuther, J. Linnerooth, and some of their colleagues (1983) investigated large-scale siting decisions while working in the International Institute for Applied System Analysis (ELASA). The problem under study was the decision process used to site liquified energy gas (LEG) facilities in four countries: the Federal Republic of Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Different countries have different institutional settings for deciding how siting choices are made. Despite major differences in approaches, Kunreuther and Linnerooth developed a general framework for describing siting decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barzilai, J., Cook, W.D. and Golany, B. Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives, Operations Research Letters 6:3, 1987, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, D., Humphreys, P., Larichev, O. and Moshkovich, H. Aiding strategic decision making: Derivation and development of ASTRID A. In Environment for Supporting Decision Processes, Y. Vecsenyi and H. Sol, eds., North Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., Siting Energy Facilities, Academic Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H.C., Linnerooth, J., Lathrop, J., Atz, H., Macgill, S., Mandl, C, Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. Risk Analysis and Decision Processes: The Siting of Liquified Energy Gas Facilities in Four Countries. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larichev, O.I. and Moshkovich, H.M. Verbal Decision Analysis for Unstructured Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larichev, O.I., Yu, A., Zuev, Y.A. and Gnedenko, L.S. Method ZAPROS (Closed Procedures near Reference Situations) for the analysis of variants of complex decisions, in S.V. Emelyanov, ed., Multicriteria Choice for the Solution of Ill-Structured Problems, Moscow: VNIISI Proceedings, N 5 (in Russian), 1978, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. Organizations, New York, Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrow, E.W.: Understanding the Outcomes of Megaprojects: A Quantitative Analysis of Very Large Civilian Projects. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, H. and Svenson, O. A think-aloud study of dominance structuring in decision processes, in Process and Structure on Human Decision Making, H. Montgomery and O. Svenson, eds., J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1989, 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. Clessement et choix en presence de criteres multiples. RIRO vol. 8, 1968, pp. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and Bouyssou, D. Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear power plant siting example. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 25, 1986, 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15:3 1977, 234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process New York, McGraw Hill 1980 (2nd ed. T.L. Saaty, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. Decision Making for Leaders Belmont, CA Van Nostrand Reinhold 1982 (2nd ed. RWS Publications, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, R.K. A social decision analysis of the earthquake safety problem: The case of existing Los Angeles buildings. Risk Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, 1983, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J.P. Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 23:3 1989, 161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper and Row Publ., 1960.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.K. and Desvousges, W.H. The value of avoiding a LULU: Hazardous waste disposal sites. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 68, no. 2, 1986, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W.E., Abrahamse, A., Bolten, J., Kahan, J.P., Van de Riet, O., Kok, M., and Den Braber, M. A policy analysis of Dutch river dike improvements: Trading off safety, cost, and environmental impacts. Operations Research vol. 42, no. 5, 1994, 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, F. The analytic hierarchy process — A survey of the method and its application., Interfaces 16 (4) 1986, 96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larichev, O.I., Olson, D.L. (2001). Methods and Decision Processes: Descriptive and Normative. In: Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3245-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3245-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4899-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3245-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics