Abstract
How are large-scale siting decisions made in practice? H. Kunreuther, J. Linnerooth, and some of their colleagues (1983) investigated large-scale siting decisions while working in the International Institute for Applied System Analysis (ELASA). The problem under study was the decision process used to site liquified energy gas (LEG) facilities in four countries: the Federal Republic of Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Different countries have different institutional settings for deciding how siting choices are made. Despite major differences in approaches, Kunreuther and Linnerooth developed a general framework for describing siting decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barzilai, J., Cook, W.D. and Golany, B. Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives, Operations Research Letters 6:3, 1987, 131–134.
Berkeley, D., Humphreys, P., Larichev, O. and Moshkovich, H. Aiding strategic decision making: Derivation and development of ASTRID A. In Environment for Supporting Decision Processes, Y. Vecsenyi and H. Sol, eds., North Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Keeney, R.L., Siting Energy Facilities, Academic Press, New York, 1980.
Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York, 1976.
Kunreuther, H.C., Linnerooth, J., Lathrop, J., Atz, H., Macgill, S., Mandl, C, Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. Risk Analysis and Decision Processes: The Siting of Liquified Energy Gas Facilities in Four Countries. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
Larichev, O.I. and Moshkovich, H.M. Verbal Decision Analysis for Unstructured Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1997.
Larichev, O.I., Yu, A., Zuev, Y.A. and Gnedenko, L.S. Method ZAPROS (Closed Procedures near Reference Situations) for the analysis of variants of complex decisions, in S.V. Emelyanov, ed., Multicriteria Choice for the Solution of Ill-Structured Problems, Moscow: VNIISI Proceedings, N 5 (in Russian), 1978, 83–97.
March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. Organizations, New York, Wiley, 1958.
Merrow, E.W.: Understanding the Outcomes of Megaprojects: A Quantitative Analysis of Very Large Civilian Projects. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1988.
Montgomery, H. and Svenson, O. A think-aloud study of dominance structuring in decision processes, in Process and Structure on Human Decision Making, H. Montgomery and O. Svenson, eds., J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1989, 135–150.
Roy, B. Clessement et choix en presence de criteres multiples. RIRO vol. 8, 1968, pp. 57–75.
Roy, B. and Bouyssou, D. Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear power plant siting example. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 25, 1986, 200–215.
Saaty, T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15:3 1977, 234–281
Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process New York, McGraw Hill 1980 (2nd ed. T.L. Saaty, 1988).
Saaty, T.L. Decision Making for Leaders Belmont, CA Van Nostrand Reinhold 1982 (2nd ed. RWS Publications, 1986).
Sarin, R.K. A social decision analysis of the earthquake safety problem: The case of existing Los Angeles buildings. Risk Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, 1983, 35–50.
Shim, J.P. Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 23:3 1989, 161–167
Simon, H.A. The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper and Row Publ., 1960.
Smith, V.K. and Desvousges, W.H. The value of avoiding a LULU: Hazardous waste disposal sites. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 68, no. 2, 1986, 293–299.
Walker, W.E., Abrahamse, A., Bolten, J., Kahan, J.P., Van de Riet, O., Kok, M., and Den Braber, M. A policy analysis of Dutch river dike improvements: Trading off safety, cost, and environmental impacts. Operations Research vol. 42, no. 5, 1994, 823–836.
Zahedi, F. The analytic hierarchy process — A survey of the method and its application., Interfaces 16 (4) 1986, 96–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larichev, O.I., Olson, D.L. (2001). Methods and Decision Processes: Descriptive and Normative. In: Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3245-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3245-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3245-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive