Skip to main content

Iterative methods for ill-conditioned linear systems from optimization

  • Chapter
Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 36))

  • 582 Accesses

Abstract

Preconditioned conjugate-gradient methods are proposed for solving the ill-conditioned linear systems which arise in penalty and barrier methods for nonlinear minimization. The preconditioners are chosen so as to isolate the dominant cause of ill conditioning. The methods are stablized using a restricted form of iterative refinement. Numerical results illustrate the approaches considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. D. Andersen, J. Gondzio, C. Mészâros, and X. Xu. Implementation of interior point methods for large scale linear programming. In T. Terlaky, editor, Interior Point Methods in Mathematical Programming, pages 189–252, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Aziz and A. Jennings. A robust incomplete Choleski conjugate gradient algorithm. International Journal on Numerical Methods in Engineering, 20: 949966, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Bongartz, A. R. Conn, N. I. M. Gould, and Ph. L. Toint. CUTE: Constrained and unconstrained testing environment. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 21 (1): 123–160, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. C. G. Broyden and N. F. Attia. A smooth sequential penalty function method for nonlinear programming. In A. V. Balakrishnan and M. Thomas, editors, 11th IFIP Conference on System Modelling and Optimization, number 59 in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pages 237–245, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, 1984. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. Bunch and L. C. Kaufman. Some stable methods for calculating inertia and solving symmetric linear equations. Mathematics of Computation, 31: 163–179, 1977.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. R. Bunch and B. N. Parlett. Direct methods for solving symmetric indefinite systems of linear equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 8 (4): 639–655, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Businger and G. H. Golub. Linear least squares solutions by Housholder transformations. Numerische Mathematik, 7: 269–276, 1965.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. T. F. Coleman and C. Hempel. Computing a trust region step for a penalty function. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 11 (1): 180–201, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. I. S. Duff and J. K. Reid. The multifrontal solution of indefinite sparse symmetric linear equations. Transactions of the ACM on Mathematical Software, 9(3):302325, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. S. Duff, J. K. Reid, N. Munksgaard, and H. B. Neilsen. Direct solution of sets of linear equations whose matrix is sparse, symmetric and indefinite. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 23: 235–250, 1979.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Fiacco and G. P. McCormick. Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 1968. Reprinted as Classics in Applied Mathematics 4, SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Fletcher. Factorizing symmetric indefinite matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 14: 257–272, 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, D. B. Ponceléon, and M. A. Saunders. Preconditioners for indefinite systems arising in optimization. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 13(1):292-311, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. H. Wright. Practical Optimization. Academic Press, London, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G. H. Golub and J. H. Wilkinson. Note on iterative refinement of least squares solutions. Numerische Mathematik, 9: 139–148, 1966.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. N. I. M. Gould. On the accurate determination of search directions for simple differentiable penalty functions. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 6: 357–372, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. N. I. M. Gould, M. E. Hribar, and J. Nocedal. On the solution of equality constrained quadratic problems arising in optimization. Technical Report RALTR-98–069, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxfordshire, England, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. I. M. Gould, S. Lucidi, M. Roma, and Ph. L. Toint. Solving the trust-region subproblem using the Lanczos method. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 9 (2): 504–525, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Harwell Subroutine Library. A catalogue of subroutines (release 12). AEA Technology, Harwell, Oxfordshire, England, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. J. Higham. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms. SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. G. Luenberger. Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, USA, second edition, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Murray. Analytical expressions for eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Hessian matrices of barrier and penalty functions. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 7: 189–196, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders. Solution of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 12 (4): 617–629, 1975.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. S. M. Robinson. Generalized equations and their solutions. 2. applications to non-linear programming. Mathematical Programming Studies, 19: 200–221, 1982.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. M. H. Wright. Ill-conditioning and computational error in interior methods for nonlinear programming. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 9 (1): 84–111, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. S. J. Wright. Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. J. Wright. Effects of finite-precision arithmetic on interior-point methods for nonlinear programming. Technical Report MCS-P705–0198, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gould, N.I.M. (2000). Iterative methods for ill-conditioned linear systems from optimization. In: Pillo, G.D., Giannessi, F. (eds) Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics. Applied Optimization, vol 36. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3226-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3226-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4823-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3226-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics