Strategies for Analyzing EBSD Datasets

  • Wayne E. King
  • James S. Stölken
  • Mukul Kumar
  • Adam J. Schwartz


Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) has emerged in recent years as a powerful tool for the characterization of micro- or meso-structure by measurements in orientation space. This is evident from the numerous examples of the applications of this technique given in other chapters of this volume. As discussed in the previous chapters, most EBSD acquisition software provide the x- and y-coordinates, the three Euler angles, and a number of other parameters including the quality of the electron backscatter diffraction pattern (EBSP) and the confidence in indexing. Commercially available software contains a myriad of functions to allow the investigator to analyze many aspects of the material micro structure. However, for certain problems in materials science, standard, commercially available software is unable to provide all the information that is required for the analysis. This chapter will explore additional representations of the EBSD dataseis and data processing software that have been developed to address particular problems encountered during investigations. Specific examples include: “clean-up” of dataseis; mapping of lattice rotations in deformed single crystals; three-dimensional reconstruction of the microstructure; and applications in the area of grain boundary engineering such as statistical information on the frequency of grain boundaries in deformed and annealed polycrystals, analysis of triple junction distributions, and mapping of the random grain boundary connectivity in the microstructure.


Triple Junction Special Boundary Fiducial Mark Combination Rule Lattice Rotation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, B.L., Zhao, J., and Grimmer, H., 1990, Discussion of the representation of intercrystalline misorientation in cubic materials, Acta Crystallog., A46:620.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, D.G., 1966, The structure of high-angle grain boundaries, Acta Metall., 14:1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, B.W., and. Pickering, H.W, 1987, Effect of grain boundary structure on sensitization and corrosion of stainless steel, Metall. Trans., 18A:1117.Google Scholar
  4. Chin, G.Y., Thurston, R.N., and Nesbitt, E.A., 1966, Finite plastic deformation due to crystallographic slip, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 236:69.Google Scholar
  5. Chow, T., Eskow, E., and Schnabel, R., 1994, Algorithm 739: a software package for unconstrained optimization using tensor methods, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 20:518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cola, M.J., Davé, V.R., Hussen, G.N.A., Kumar, M., Schwartz, A.J., and Baer, J., 2000, Grain Boundary Character Distribution in Alloy 690 and its Influence on Weldability in, Abstracts of Papers of the Annual Meeting of the American Welding Society, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  7. Crawford, D.C., and Was, G.S., 1992, The role of grain boundary misorientation in intergranular cracking of Ni-16Cr-9Fe in 360 degrees C argon and high-purity water, Metall Trans., 23A: 1195.Google Scholar
  8. Don, J. and Majumdar, S., 1986, Creep cavitation and grain boundary structure in type 304 stainless steel, Acta Metall, 34:961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrell, EJ. and Zappulla, R.A., 1989, 3-dimensional data visualization and biomedical applications, CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 16:323.Google Scholar
  10. Field, D. P., and Adams, B.L., 1992, Interface cavitation damage in polycrystalline copper, Acta Metall. Mater., 40:1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortier, P., Aust, K.T., and Miller, W.A., 1995, Effects of symmetry, texture and topology on triple junction character distribution in polycrystalline materials, Acta Mater., 43:339.Google Scholar
  12. Fortier, P., Miller, W.A., and Aust, K.T., 1997, Triple junction and grain boundary character distribution in metallic materials,” Acta Mater., 45:3459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, F.C., 1980, Orientation mapping, Metall. Trans. A, 19:403.Google Scholar
  14. Gertsman, V.Y., and Tangri, K., 1995, Computer simulation study of grain boundary and triple junction distributions in microstructures formed by multiple twinning, Acta Metall. Mater., 43:2317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gertsman, V.Y., and Tangri, K., 1997, Modeling of intergranular damage propagation, Acta Mater., 45:4107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimmer, H., Bollmann, W., and Warrington, D.H., 1974, Coincidence-site lattices and complete pattern-shift lattices in cubic crystals, Acta Crystallog., A30:197. IMOD, Homepage URL: Scholar
  17. Kumar, M., King, W.E., and Schwartz, A.J., 2000, Modifications to the microstructural topology in f.c.c. materials with thermomechanical processing, Acta Mater., 48:2081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lassen, N.C.K., Jensen, D.J., and Conradsen, K., 1994, On the statistical analysis of orientation data, Acta Crystallog., A50:741.Google Scholar
  19. Lehockey, E.M., and Palumbo, G., 1997, On the creep behavior of grain boundary engineered nickel, Mater. Sci. Eng.,A237:168.Google Scholar
  20. Lehockey, E.M., Palumbo, G., Aust, K.T., Erb, U., and Lin, P., 1998, On the role of intercrystalline defects in polycrystal plasticity, Scripta Mater., 39:341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehockey, E.M., Palumbo, G., and Lin, P., 1998, Grain boundary structure effects on cold work embrittlement of microalloyed steels, Scripta Mater., 39:353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehockey, E.M., Palumbo, G., Lin, P., and Brennenstuhl, A., 1998, Mitigating intergranular attack and growth in lead-acid battery electrodes for extended cycle and operating life, Metall. Mater. Trans., 29A:3069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehockey, E.M., Palumbo, G., and Lin, P., 1998, Improving the weldability and service performance of nickel- and iron-based superalloys by grain boundary engineering, Metall. Mater. Trans., 29A:387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim, L.C., and Watanabe, T., 1990, Fracture toughness and brittle-ductile transition controlled by grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) in polycrystals, Acta Metall. Mater., 38:2507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin, P., Palumbo, G., Erb, U., and Aust, K.T., 1995, Influence of grain boundary character distribution on sensitization and intergranular corrosion of Alloy 600, Scripta Metall. Mater., 33:1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyazawa, K., Iwasaki, Y., Ito, K., and Ishida, Y., 1996, Combination rule of Sigma values at triple junctions in cubic polycrystals, Acta Crystallog., A52:787.Google Scholar
  27. Moik, J.G., 1980, Digital Processing of Remotely Sensed Images, Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Nabarro, F.R.N, (ed.), 1980, Dislocations in Solids, V4: Dislocations in Metallurgy, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. NIH Image, Homepage URL: nih, gov /nih -image/.
  30. Palumbo, G., 1997, U.S. patent 5,702,543, Thermomechanical processing of metallic materials.Google Scholar
  31. Palumbo, G., 1998, U.S. patent 5,817,193, Metal alloys having improved resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking.Google Scholar
  32. Palumbo, G., and Aust, K.T., 1988, Localized corrosion at grain boundary intersections in high purity nickel, Scripta Metall, 22:847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palumbo, G., and Aust, K.T., 1990, Structure-dependence of intergranular corrosion in high purity nickel, Acta Metall. Mater., 38:2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palumbo, G., King, P.J., Aust, K.T., Erb, U., and Lichtenberger, P.C., 1991, Grain boundary design and control for intergranular stress-corrosion resistance, Scripta Metall. Mater. 25(8): 1775–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pratt, W.K., 1991, Digital Image Processing, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Rousseeuw, P. J., and Leroy, A.M., 1987, Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, A.J., King, W.E., Campbell, G.H., Stolken, J.S., Lassila, D.H., Sun, S., and Adams, B.L., 1999, Orientation imaging microscopy investigation of the compression deformation of a [Oil] Ta single crystal, J. Eng. Mater. Technol, 121:178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thaveeprungsriporn, V., and Was, G.S., 1997, The role of coincidence-site-lattice boundaries in creep of Ni- 16Cr-9Fe at 360 degrees C, Metall. Mater. Trans., 28A:2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomson, C.B., and Randle, V., 1997, “Fine-tuning at Sigma 3” boundaries in nickel, Acta Mater., 45:4909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wall, M.A., Schwartz, AJ., and Nguyen, L., 2000, A high-resolution serial sectioning specimen preparation technique for three-dimensional orientation imaging microscopy, Submitted.Google Scholar
  41. Watanabe, T., 1984, An approach to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals, Res Mechanica, 11:47.Google Scholar
  42. Watanabe, T., 1985, Structural effects on grain boundary segregation, hardening and fracture, J. Physique, C46:555.Google Scholar
  43. Wells, D.B., Stewart, J., Herbert, A.W., Scott, P.M., Williams, D.E., 1989, The use of percolation theory to predict the probability of failure of sensitized, austenitic stainless steels by intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Corrosion, 45:649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wenk, H.R. and Kocks, U.F., 1987, The representation of orientation distributions, Metall. Trans. A, 18:1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne E. King
    • 1
  • James S. Stölken
    • 1
  • Mukul Kumar
    • 1
  • Adam J. Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryChemistry and Materials Science DirectorateLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations