Successful Systems or Successful Technologies?

  • Rajiv Khosla
  • Ishwar K. Sethi
  • Ernesto Damiani
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 582)


Since the advent of computers, technology has been used by the software industry as a means of developing a competitive edge. On the other hand research institutions and universities have pursued technology as a means of innovation and novelty. As a result today, we have a range of technologies and techniques in intelligent systems, software engineering, databases and other areas. At the receiving end of this technology -based competition and innovation are the computer users. These users (majority of whom are nonspecialists) today have to cope with not only the range of technologies but also pace of technological change. They are used as guinea pigs for every technological innovation. More so, most technologies are presented to the users as a panacea of all ills. This approach has lead to a number of problems ranging from ineffective use of computers to loss of human lives (Preece et al 1997). These problems have given birth to new type of systems, namely, human-centered systems in the last decade (Norman 1993,97; Clancey 1997; Flanagan et. al. 1997).


Successful System Successful Technology Computer Industry Technology Life Cycle Marketing Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clancey W.J. (1989). “The Knowledge Level Reconsidered: Modeling How Systems Interact” in Machine Learning 4, pp 285–92.Google Scholar
  2. Clancey, W.J. (1993) “Situated Action: A Neuropsychological Interpretation (Response to Vera and Simon)” in Cognitive Science, 17, 87–116.Google Scholar
  3. Flanagan, J.,Huang, T et al. (1997). “Human-Centered Systems: Information, Interactivity, and Intelligence,” Final report NSF Workshop on Human-Centered Systems, February.Google Scholar
  4. Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. Reading: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Norman, D. A. (1998). The Invisible Computer, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. NSF Workshop on Human-Centered Systems, February 1997. Final report. Google Scholar
  8. Flanagan, J.,Huang, T et al. (1997). Human-Centered Systems: Information, Interactivity, and Intelligence.Google Scholar
  9. Perrow, C., Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. 1984, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Preece, J., et al (1997), Human-Computer Interaction, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Pub.Google Scholar
  11. Sarter, N., Woods, D.D. and Billings, C. (1997), “Automation Surprises,” in G. Slavendy, (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors/Ergonomics, second edition, WileyGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang, J., Norman, D. A. (1994), “Distributed Cognitive Tasks”, Cognitive Science, pp. 84–120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajiv Khosla
  • Ishwar K. Sethi
  • Ernesto Damiani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations