Skip to main content

Reputation and Competence in Publicly Funded Science: Estimating the Effects on Research Group Productivity

  • Chapter
The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation

Abstract

This paper estimates the “production function” for scientific research publications in the field of biotechnology. It utilises an exceptionally rich and comprehensive data set pertaining to the universe of research groups that applied to a 1989–1993 research programme in biotechnology and bio-instrumentation, sponsored by the Italian National Research Council, CNR. A structural model of the resource allocation process in scientific research guides the selection of instruments in the econometric analysis, and controls for selectivity bias effects on estimates based on the performance of funded research units. The average elasticity of research output with respect to the research budget is estimated to be 0.6; but, for a small fraction of groups led by highly prestigious Pls this elasticity approaches 1. These estimates imply, conditional on the distribution of observed productivity, that a more unequal distribution of research funds would increase research output in the short-run. Past research publication performance is found to have an important effect on expected levels of grant funding, and hence on the unit’s current productivity in terms of (quality adjusted) publications. The results show that the productivity of aggregate resource expenditures supporting scientific research is critically dependent on the institutional mechanisms and criteria employed in the allocation of such resources.

We thank the Director of the CNR Programme “Biotechnology and Bio-instrumentation”, Professor Antonio De Flora, for his cooperation. Previous versions of this paper were presented to seminars at Carnegie Mellon University, the London School of Economics (STICERD), the NBER Summer Workhops in Industrial Organization (Cambridge), and the University of Pittsburgh. We have benefited particularly from the comments provided by Zvi Griliches, Bronwyn Hall, and Steve Nickell, and from Jacques Mairesse’s encouragement in preparing this version of the paper for publication. We also acknowledge the financial support we received for various stages of this research from the International Centre for Economic Research (ICER) in Torino, the University of Urbino (MURST 60%), the EC Human Capital Mobility Programme (Contract N.ERBCHRXCT920002), the Renaissance Trust (UK), and MERIT, University of Limburg. Fabrizio Cesaroni, Marco Cioppi, and Aldo Geuna provided competent research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allison, P., Price, Solla, D. J. de, Griffith, B., Moravcsik, M., Stewart, J. (1976). –“Lotka’s Law: A Problem in its Interpretation and Application”, Social Studies of Sciences, Vol. 6, pp. 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P., Long, S., Krause, T. (1982). — “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 47(5), pp. 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Gambardella, A. (1997). — “Public Policy Towards Science: Picking Stars or Spreading the Wealth?”, Revue d’Économie Industrielle, N. 79, pp. 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., David, P. A. (1987). — “Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology”, in Feiwel, G. (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, New York University Press, New York, pp. 519–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., David, P. A. (1994). — “Towards a New Economics of Science”, Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 487–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1993). — “Knowledge, Property and the System Dynamics of Technological Change”, in Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics: 1992, Summers, L. and Shah, S. (ed.), Washington DC, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1994). — “Positive Feedbacks and Research Productivity in Science: Reopening Another Black Box”, in Granstrand, O. (ed.) Economics of Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Report on Science and Technology Indicators (The) (1994), European Commission, DG XII, EUR 15897 EN, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1989). — “Real Effects of Academic Research”, American Economic Review, Vol. 79, (5), pp. 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Stephan, P. (1991). — “Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists”, American Economic Review, Vol. 81, (1), pp. 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loka, A. (1926). — “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity”, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 16, (12), pp. 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1991). — “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 20, (1), pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968). — “The Matthew Effect in Science”, Science, Vol. 159, (3810), pp. 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Olivastro, D. (1992). — “Status Report — Linkage between Technology and Science”, Research Policy, Vol. 21, (3), pp. 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1986). — “Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry”, American Economic Review Proceedings, Vol. 76, (2), pp. 186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994). — Main Science and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). — Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla (1976). — “A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes”, Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, Vol. 27, (5/6), pp. 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P., Levin, S. (1992). — Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place and Time, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. (1996). — “The Economics of Science”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIV, pp. 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arora, A., David, P.A., Gambardella, A. (2000). Reputation and Competence in Publicly Funded Science: Estimating the Effects on Research Group Productivity. In: The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4971-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3194-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics