Skip to main content

Factor Intensities, Rates of Return, and International R&D Spillovers: The Case of Canadian and U.S. Industries

  • Chapter
The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation

Abstract

— This paper estimates the effects of both intranational and international spillovers on production cost, and factor intensities (including R&D intensity) for eleven manufacturing industries in the U.S., and Canada. In addition, social rates of return to R&D capital are calculated, and decomposed into private rates of return, and the extra-returns due to intranational and international spillovers.

International spillovers are usually cost reducing, and increase R&D and physical capital intensities. International spillovers are generally labor and intermediate input intensity reducing. In Canada, international spillover effects are more elastic than domestic spillover elasticities. In the U.S. the same relationship exists, but is not as pronounced.

Social rates of return to R&D capital are substantially above the private rates in both Canada and U.S. In Canada, international spillovers generally account for a greater percentage of the social returns relative to the domestic spillovers. In the U.S. the converse occurs. Canadian social rates are from two and a half to twelve times greater than private returns, while U.S. social returns are from three and a half to ten times greater than the private rates.

I would like to thank Xiaoyi Yan, and Lin Bian for their research assistance. Brian Erard, Steven Globerman, Zvi Griliches, Jacques Mairesse, Ross Preston, Somshwar Rao, and two anonymous referees provided valuable comments and suggestions. Funding for this study was provided by Industry Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernstein, J. I., Mohnen, P. (1977). — “International R&D Spillovers Between U.S. and Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors”, forthcoming Journal of International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. (1992). — “Price Indexes for Canadian Industrial Research and Development Expenditures, Statistics Canada, Services, Science and Technology Division Working Paper No. 92–01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. (1988). -“Costs of Production, Intra-and Inter-Industry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 21, pp. 324–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I., Nadiri, M. I. (1988). — “Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 78, pp. 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L. (1996). — “Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope?, Microeconomic Evidence from the U.S. and Japan”. Paper presented at the International Conference on Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., Helpman, E. (1995). — International R&D Spillovers”, European Economic Review, 39, pp. 859–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M, Bernstein, J., Fuss, M., Nakamura, S., Waverman, L. (1992). — “Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, Canada, Japan, and the United States, 1953–1986, Was the ‘Productivity Slowdown* reversed?”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 25, pp. 584–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E., Wales, T. J. (1988). — “A Normalized Quadratic Semiflexible Function Form”, Journal of Econometrics, 37, pp. 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E., Wales T. J. (1987). — “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions”, Econometrics, 55, pp. 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1982). — “Duality Approaches to Microeconomic Theory”, in K. Arrow and M. Intrilligator, Eds., Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 2; Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., Kortum, S. (1996). — “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD”, Journal of International Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1991). — “The Search for R&D Spillovers”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Supplement, 94, pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1991). — Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, J. (1993). — “Do we Need a Price Index for Industrial R&D?”, Research Policy, 22, pp. 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., Kuroda M. (1990). — “Productivity and International Competitiveness in Japan and the United States 1960–1985”, in C. Hulten, Ed., Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., Sakuramoto, H., Yoshioka, K., Kuroda, M. (1990). — “Bilateral Models of Production for Japanese and U.S. Industries”, in C. Hulten, Ed., Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, University of Chicago press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., Nishimizu, M. (1978). — U.S. and Japanese economic growth 1952–1974, an international comparison, Economic Journal, 88, pp. 707–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1996). — Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-Related? Analysing Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners”, SSRI Working Paper, 96–07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F., Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (1996). — “International R&D Spillovers: a Re-Examination, NBER Working Paper no. 5668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen, P. (1990). — “Relationship between R&D and Productivity Growth in Canada and other Major Industrialized Countries”, University of Quebec in Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M. I. (1993). — “Innovations and Technological Spillovers”, NBER WorkingPaper no. 4423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M. I., Prucha, I. (1993). — “Estimation of the Depreciation Rate of Physical and R&D Capital in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector”, NBER Working Paper no. 4591.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L., Roger, W. (1991). — “An Econometric Investigation of the Interrelationship of R&D Expenditures and Technical Progress”, Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernstein, J.I. (2000). Factor Intensities, Rates of Return, and International R&D Spillovers: The Case of Canadian and U.S. Industries. In: The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4971-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3194-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics