Abstract
During the past few decades, the interest of economists in the sources of long run economic growth has led an increasing number to focus their attention on the role of innovation in creating that growth. Although some researchers have always been interested in this topic, in the last few years many others have recognized the central role played by innovation in almost all spheres of economic activity. Taking a somewhat U.S.-centric perspective, one can probably date the origins of the mainstream development of this research agenda from Solow’s (1957) «discovery» of the importance of the «residual» in aggregate productivity growth and Nelson’s (1959) and Arrow’s (1962) influential papers on the economics of knowledge creation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998): Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Arrow, K. (1962):“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, 609–25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995): Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bond, S., J. A. Elston, J. Mairesse and B. Mulkay (1997): «A Comparison of Empirical Investment Equations Using Company Level Data for France, Germany, Belgium and the UK», NBER Working Paper n° 5900.
Bond, S. and C. Meghir (1994): «Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm’s Financial Policy», Review of Economic Studies, 61, 197–222.
Bresnahan, T. F. and M. Trajtenberg (1995): «General Purpose Technologies: ‘Engines of Growth»?», Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108.
Cameron, A.C. and P.K. Trivedi (1998): Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Choi, J.P. (1991): «Dynamic R&D Competition under ‘Hazard Rate’ Uncertainty», Rand Journal of Economics, 22: 596–610.
Chou, C.F. and O. Shy (1991): «New product development and the optimal duration of patents», Southern Economic Journal, 57: 811–821.
Coe, D. and E. Helpman (1995): «International R&D Spillovers», European Economic Review, 39(5).
Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (1996): «A First Look at the Results of the 1994 Carnegie-Mellon Survey of Industrial R&D in the United States,» unpublished manuscript, February 28.
Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (1997): «Appropriability Conditions and Why Firms Patent and Why They Do Not in the American Manufacturing Sector,» unpublished manuscript, June 24.
Crépon, B. and E. Duguet (1997a): «Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation: Pseudo Maximum Likelihood and Simulated Maximum Likelihood Methods Applied to Count Data Models with Heterogeneity,» Journal of Econometrics 79: 355–78.
Crépon, B. and E. Duguet (1997b): «Estimating the Innovation Function from Patent Numbers: GMM on Count Panel Data,» Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 243–63.
Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz (1980): «Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,» Economic Journal, 90, 266–293.
D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1985): «Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D in a Duopoly with Spillovers, American Economic Review, 78: 1133–1137.
David, P. (1990): «The Computer and the Dynamo: An Historical Perspective on the Productivity Paradox», American Economie Review, 80: 355–361.
David, P. (1985): «CLIO and the Economies of QWERTY», American Economie Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75: 332–337.
Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger (1992): «Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction and Employment Reallocation», Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 819–864.
Duguet, E. and N. Greenan (1997): «Le biais technologique: une analyse économétrique sur données individuelles», Revue Economique, 48 (5): 1061–1089.
Encaoua, D., M. Moreaux and A. Perrot (1996): «Compatibility and Competition in Airlines», Internationaljournal of Industrial Organization, 14: 701–726.
Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (1992): «Standard Setting in High Definition Television», Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 1–93.
Gilbert, R. and C. Shapiro (1990): «Optimal Patent Length and Breadth», Rand Journal of Economics, 21 (1): 106–112.
Goux and Maurin (1997): «Le déclin de la demande de travail non qualifié. Une méthode d’analyse empirique et son application au cas de la France», Revue Economique, 48 (5): 1091–1114.
Green, J. and S. Scotchmer (1990): «Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law», Rand Journal of Economies, 21 (1): 131–147.
Griliches, Z. (1995): «R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues», in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, P. Stoneman (ed.). Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
Griliches, Z. (1957): “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica, 25, 27–52.
Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse (1999): «Production Functions: The Search for Identification,» in S. Ström (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frish Centennial Symposium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griliches, Z., A. Pakes, and B.H. Hall (1987): «The Value of Patents as Indicators of Economic Activity,» in Dasgupta and Stoneman (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991): Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Hall, B.H. (1992): «R&D Investment at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?» Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 4095.
Hall, B.H., Z. Griliches, and J.A. Hausman (1986): “Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?” International Economic Review, 27, 265–83.
Hall, B.H. and R.M. Ham (1999): “The Determinants of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1980–1994,” Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 7062.
Hall, B.H. and F. Hayashi (1989): «Research and Development as an Investment,» Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 2973.
Hall, B.H. and F. Kramarz (eds.) (1998): Economies of Innovation and New Technology 6, Issue 2/3/4, special issue on the effects of innovation on firm performance, employment, and productivity.
Helpman, E. and M. Trajtenberg (1994): «A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies,» NBER Working Paper No. 4854.
Himmelberg, C. P. and B. C. Petersen (1994): «R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76: 38–51.
Hugues, J. and E. Snyder (1995): «Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence», The Journal of Law and Economics, 38: 225–250.
Jaffe, A. (1986): «Technological Opportunity and Spillover of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value», American Economic Review 4, 76,:984–1001.
Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1980): Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, M. and C. Shapiro (1985): «Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility», American Economic Review, 75: 424–440.
Keller, W. (1996): «Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-Related: Analyzing Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners,» NBER Working Paper No. 6065.
Kleinknecht, A. (1996) «New Indicators and Determinants of Innovation: An Introduction», in Determinants of Innovation, the Message from New Indicators, edited by Alfred Kleinknecht, London, MacMillan Press.
Klemperer, P. (1990): «How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection be?», The Rand Journal of Economics,21 (1): 113–130.
Klette, T. J. and Z. Griliches (1996): «The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous», Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 343–361.
Koran, V. (1994): An Introductory Guide to EC Competition. Law and Practice, 5th edition, London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Lach, S. and M. Schankerman (1988): «Dynamics of R&D and Investment in the Scientific Sector,» Journal of Political Economy, 97, 880–904.
Lerner, J. (1994): «The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis», The Rand Journal of Economics, 25: 319–333.
Lerner, J. (1995): «Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors», Journal of Law and Economics, 38,463–496.
Loury, G.C. (1979): «Market Structure and Innovation,» Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 395–410.
Mairesse, J., Hall, B.H. and B. Mulkay (1998): «Firm-Level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years», Annales de l’Economie et de la Statistique,n 55/56, Sept/Dec, p. 27–67.
Mairesse, J. and M. Sassenou (1991): «Recherche-Développement et Productivité: un panorama des études économétriques sur données d’entreprises», Revue Science Technologie — Industrie, Paris, OCDE, 8,. 9–45. [English Version: «R-D and Productivity: a Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level», Science-Technology Industry Review, Paris, OECD, 8,. 9–43].
Mansfield, E. (1961): “Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation,” Econometrica, 29, 741–766.
Mohnen, P. (1996): «R&D Externalities and Productivity Growth», Science-Technology Industry Review, Paris, OECD, 13,. 39–66.
Nelson, R. R. (1959): “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of Political Economy, 51, 297–306.
Nordhaus, W. (1969): «An Economic Theory of Technical Change,» American Economic Review 59 (2): 18–28.
Oliner, S. and D. Sichel, (1994): «Computers and Output Growth Revisited: How Big Is the Puzzle?», Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 273–317.
Pakes, A. (1982): «Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks,» Econometrica, 64, 755–784.
Penrose, E.T. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Pissarides, C.A. (1990): Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Reinganum, J.F. (1989): «The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion,» in R. Schmalansee and R.D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: North-Holland.
Reitzes, J.D. (1991): «The Impact of Quotas and Tariffs on Strategic R&D Behavion», International Economic Review, 32 (4): 985–1008.
Rosenberg, N. (1976): «Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910,» in Perspectives in Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmookler, J. (1966): Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Solow, R. M. (1957): “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.
Uzawa, H. (1969): «Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth», Journal of Political Economy, 77, 628–652.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Encaoua, D., Hall, B.H., Laisney, F., Mairesse, J. (2000). Overview. In: The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4971-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3194-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive