Skip to main content

Abstract

During the past few decades, the interest of economists in the sources of long run economic growth has led an increasing number to focus their attention on the role of innovation in creating that growth. Although some researchers have always been interested in this topic, in the last few years many others have recognized the central role played by innovation in almost all spheres of economic activity. Taking a somewhat U.S.-centric perspective, one can probably date the origins of the mainstream development of this research agenda from Solow’s (1957) «discovery» of the importance of the «residual» in aggregate productivity growth and Nelson’s (1959) and Arrow’s (1962) influential papers on the economics of knowledge creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998): Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962):“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, 609–25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995): Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S., J. A. Elston, J. Mairesse and B. Mulkay (1997): «A Comparison of Empirical Investment Equations Using Company Level Data for France, Germany, Belgium and the UK», NBER Working Paper n° 5900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S. and C. Meghir (1994): «Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm’s Financial Policy», Review of Economic Studies, 61, 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. F. and M. Trajtenberg (1995): «General Purpose Technologies: ‘Engines of Growth»?», Journal of Econometrics 65: 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C. and P.K. Trivedi (1998): Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.P. (1991): «Dynamic R&D Competition under ‘Hazard Rate’ Uncertainty», Rand Journal of Economics, 22: 596–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.F. and O. Shy (1991): «New product development and the optimal duration of patents», Southern Economic Journal, 57: 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. and E. Helpman (1995): «International R&D Spillovers», European Economic Review, 39(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (1996): «A First Look at the Results of the 1994 Carnegie-Mellon Survey of Industrial R&D in the United States,» unpublished manuscript, February 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (1997): «Appropriability Conditions and Why Firms Patent and Why They Do Not in the American Manufacturing Sector,» unpublished manuscript, June 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B. and E. Duguet (1997a): «Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation: Pseudo Maximum Likelihood and Simulated Maximum Likelihood Methods Applied to Count Data Models with Heterogeneity,» Journal of Econometrics 79: 355–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B. and E. Duguet (1997b): «Estimating the Innovation Function from Patent Numbers: GMM on Count Panel Data,» Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 243–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz (1980): «Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,» Economic Journal, 90, 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1985): «Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D in a Duopoly with Spillovers, American Economic Review, 78: 1133–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1990): «The Computer and the Dynamo: An Historical Perspective on the Productivity Paradox», American Economie Review, 80: 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1985): «CLIO and the Economies of QWERTY», American Economie Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75: 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger (1992): «Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction and Employment Reallocation», Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 819–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguet, E. and N. Greenan (1997): «Le biais technologique: une analyse économétrique sur données individuelles», Revue Economique, 48 (5): 1061–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encaoua, D., M. Moreaux and A. Perrot (1996): «Compatibility and Competition in Airlines», Internationaljournal of Industrial Organization, 14: 701–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (1992): «Standard Setting in High Definition Television», Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. and C. Shapiro (1990): «Optimal Patent Length and Breadth», Rand Journal of Economics, 21 (1): 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goux and Maurin (1997): «Le déclin de la demande de travail non qualifié. Une méthode d’analyse empirique et son application au cas de la France», Revue Economique, 48 (5): 1091–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. and S. Scotchmer (1990): «Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law», Rand Journal of Economies, 21 (1): 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1995): «R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues», in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, P. Stoneman (ed.). Basil Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1957): “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica, 25, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse (1999): «Production Functions: The Search for Identification,» in S. Ström (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frish Centennial Symposium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., A. Pakes, and B.H. Hall (1987): «The Value of Patents as Indicators of Economic Activity,» in Dasgupta and Stoneman (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991): Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. (1992): «R&D Investment at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?» Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 4095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., Z. Griliches, and J.A. Hausman (1986): “Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?” International Economic Review, 27, 265–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. and R.M. Ham (1999): “The Determinants of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1980–1994,” Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 7062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. and F. Hayashi (1989): «Research and Development as an Investment,» Cambridge, Mass.: NBER Working Paper No. 2973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. and F. Kramarz (eds.) (1998): Economies of Innovation and New Technology 6, Issue 2/3/4, special issue on the effects of innovation on firm performance, employment, and productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and M. Trajtenberg (1994): «A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies,» NBER Working Paper No. 4854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg, C. P. and B. C. Petersen (1994): «R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76: 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugues, J. and E. Snyder (1995): «Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence», The Journal of Law and Economics, 38: 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1986): «Technological Opportunity and Spillover of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value», American Economic Review 4, 76,:984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1980): Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. and C. Shapiro (1985): «Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility», American Economic Review, 75: 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1996): «Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-Related: Analyzing Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners,» NBER Working Paper No. 6065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1996) «New Indicators and Determinants of Innovation: An Introduction», in Determinants of Innovation, the Message from New Indicators, edited by Alfred Kleinknecht, London, MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1990): «How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection be?», The Rand Journal of Economics,21 (1): 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klette, T. J. and Z. Griliches (1996): «The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous», Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koran, V. (1994): An Introductory Guide to EC Competition. Law and Practice, 5th edition, London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach, S. and M. Schankerman (1988): «Dynamics of R&D and Investment in the Scientific Sector,» Journal of Political Economy, 97, 880–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1994): «The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis», The Rand Journal of Economics, 25: 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1995): «Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors», Journal of Law and Economics, 38,463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G.C. (1979): «Market Structure and Innovation,» Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Hall, B.H. and B. Mulkay (1998): «Firm-Level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years», Annales de l’Economie et de la Statistique,n 55/56, Sept/Dec, p. 27–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J. and M. Sassenou (1991): «Recherche-Développement et Productivité: un panorama des études économétriques sur données d’entreprises», Revue Science Technologie — Industrie, Paris, OCDE, 8,. 9–45. [English Version: «R-D and Productivity: a Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level», Science-Technology Industry Review, Paris, OECD, 8,. 9–43].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1961): “Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation,” Econometrica, 29, 741–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen, P. (1996): «R&D Externalities and Productivity Growth», Science-Technology Industry Review, Paris, OECD, 13,. 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1959): “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of Political Economy, 51, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (1969): «An Economic Theory of Technical Change,» American Economic Review 59 (2): 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliner, S. and D. Sichel, (1994): «Computers and Output Growth Revisited: How Big Is the Puzzle?», Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 273–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, A. (1982): «Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks,» Econometrica, 64, 755–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides, C.A. (1990): Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J.F. (1989): «The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion,» in R. Schmalansee and R.D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, J.D. (1991): «The Impact of Quotas and Tariffs on Strategic R&D Behavion», International Economic Review, 32 (4): 985–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976): «Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910,» in Perspectives in Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966): Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957): “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1969): «Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth», Journal of Political Economy, 77, 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Encaoua, D., Hall, B.H., Laisney, F., Mairesse, J. (2000). Overview. In: The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4971-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3194-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics