Skip to main content

Transmission — Enabler of Wholesale Competition

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 37))

Abstract

Traditionally, the electric utility industry has been structured as a vertically integrated regulated monopoly. This began to change in the 1980s with the privatization of the industry in the United Kingdom. One important aim of the U.K. privatization was to introduce competition into an industry that previously had been a publicly owned monopoly. A similar process of attempting to open up the industry to competition was set in motion in the United States with the Energy Policy Act of 1992. However, the process is far from complete and agreement as to the structure of the industry currently does not exist. This is nowhere more apparent than in the problem of the organization and ownership of the transmission function, which plays a critical role in enabling competition to take place. Thus, this paper is concerned with governance of transmission networks.

A version of this paper was also presented to the Rutgers University Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition. We would like to thank our discussants, Joseph Oates and Peter Yochum for helpful comments. In addition, Colin Loxley, Mark Reeder and Cliff Rochlin provided some useful insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Awerbuch, Shimon, Leonard Hyman, Andrew Vesey, and et. al. 1999. Unlocking the Benefits of Restructuring: A Blueprint for Transmission,Arlington, VA: PUR, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Hung-Po and Hillard G. Huntington (Eds). 1998. Designing Competitive Electricity Markets, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A. (Ed). 1999. Regulation under Increasing Competition, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1986. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation, New York, NY: St Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1999. “Regulatory Governance and Competitive Entry.” In Regulation under Increasing Competition,Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, William W. 1992. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4 (3): 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul L.. 1999. Comments of Professor Paul L. Joskow. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. Rm99–2–000, August 16, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, Paul R. 1998. “Ownership Structure, Contracting and Regulation of Transmission Services Providers.” In Designing Competitive Electricity Markets, edited by Hung-Po Chao and Hillard G. Huntington. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, Thomas P. 1994. “A Model of Sliding Scale Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 9 (3): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, David. 2000. “Killing the Goose that May Have Laid the Golden Egg: Only the Data Know Whether Sabotage Pays.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17 (2): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Oren. 1998. “Authority and Responsibilities of the ISO: Objectives, Options and Tradeoffs,” in Chao and Huntington

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, Dennis. 1995. “Regulation and the Vertically Integrated Firm: the Case of Entry into InterLATA Long Distance.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8 (3): 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, Dennis, and Dale Lehman. 1998. “The Next Generation of Price Cap Plans,” presented at Rutgers University 11th Annual Western Conference, Monterey, California, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Robert. 1998. “Pricing Issues.” In Designing Competitive Electricity Markets, edited by Hung-Po Chao and Hillard G. Huntington. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awerbuch, S., Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (2000). Transmission — Enabler of Wholesale Competition. In: Crew, M.A. (eds) Expanding Competition in Regulated Industries. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 37. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3192-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3192-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5006-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3192-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics