Skip to main content

Cost Efficiency and Technology of Rural Telephone Companies

  • Chapter
Expanding Competition in Regulated Industries

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 37))

  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

After passing by overwhelming margins in Congress, the President signed on February 8, 1996 the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–104). The Act established several sweeping national telecommunications policies. In particular, the Act formally created a national economic policy to promote the introduction of competition into the local telecommunications marketplace. In addition, the Act codified a popular notion of universal service along with several significant extensions. These policies, however, were viewed with some apprehension inside and outside of Congress at the time of the Act’s enactment, because policies that promote competition may be in conflict with policies that maintain or extend universal service. In fact, these concerns resulted in exemptions, suspensions and modifications from parts of the law’s competitive requirements for rural telephone companies.

The views and opinions of the author do not necessarily state or reflect the views, opinions, or policies of SBC Communication, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries. I am thankful to Yangru Wu and Michael Crew for comments but retain responsibility for any errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aigner, Dennis, C. A. Knox Lovell and Peter Schmidt. 1977. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, Tim. 1996. “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation.” CEPA Working Paper 96/07. Annidale: University of New England, Department of Econometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, Tim, D.S. Prasada Rao and George E.Battese. 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, Kent A. 1996. “Regulation, Competition and Rural Telephone Companies.” In Pricing and Regulatory Innovations under Increasing Competition, edited by Michael A. Crew. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinc, Mustafa, Kingsley E. Haynes, Roger R. Stough and Serdar Yilmaz. 1998. “Regional Telecommunications Universal Service Provisions in the US: Efficiency versus Penetration.” Telecommunications Policy 22 (6): 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, Bruce L. 1992. “Bringing Advanced Technology to Rural America: The Cost of Technology Adoption.” Telecommunications Policy 16 (1): 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1997. Self-Certification as a Rural Telephone Company. Public Notice. CC Docket 96–45. DA 97–1748 Corrected. Released September 22, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1998. Common Carrier Bureau Sends List of Rural Telephone Companies to the Universal Service Administrative Company for Purposes of Determining Federal Universal Service High Cost Support Beginning July 1, 1999. Public Notice. CC Docket 96–45. DA 98–2642 Corrected. Released December 31, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1999. Common Carrier Bureau Sends Updated Lists of Rural and Non-Rural Telephone Companies to the Universal Service Administrative Company and Changes 1999 Self-Certification Filing Deadline. Public Notice. CC Docket 96–45. DA 99–459. Released March 16, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal-State Joint Board Staff. 1999. “Monitoring Report, CC Docket No. 98–202, June 1999.” CC Docket No. 96–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldmann, Jean-Michel. 1991. “Economies of Scale and Density in Local Telephone Networks.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 20 (4): 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenkamp, Georg. 1976. Specification and Estimation of Multiple-Output Production Functions. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E., Timothy J. Tardif and Dennis L. Weisman. 1999. “The Telecommunications Act at Three Years: An Economic Evaluation of Its Implementation by the Federal Communications Commission.” Information Economics and Policy 11 (4): 319–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodde, David A. and Franz C. Palm. 1986. “Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions.” Econometrica 54 (5): 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, Subal C. and C. A. Knox Lovell. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resende, Marcelo. 1999. “Productivity Growth and Regulation in U.S. Local Telephone.” Information Economics and Policy 11 (1): 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Stanford L. and John B. Meisel. 1993. “Telephone Company Ownership of Rural Cable Television Companies.” Review of Industrial Organization 8 (4): 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, Wim and Julien Broeck. 1977. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review 18 (2), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Public Utilities Manual. 1999. Mergent FIS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Richard T. and John S. Ying. 1992. “Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone.” Rand Journal of Economics 23 (2): 171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1998. 1997 Statistical Report, Rural Telephone Borrowers. Washington, D.C.: Rural Utilities Service, Informational Publication 300–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1997. “Financial and Statistical Report for Telephone Borrowers, Form 479.” Rural Utilities Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Currie, K.A. (2000). Cost Efficiency and Technology of Rural Telephone Companies. In: Crew, M.A. (eds) Expanding Competition in Regulated Industries. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 37. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3192-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3192-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5006-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3192-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics