Dynamic offset-cancellation techniques

  • Anton Bakker
  • Johan Huijsing
Part of the High-Accuracy CMOS Smart Temperature Sensors book series (SECS, volume 595)


This chapter describes the theory and design of the different kinds of dynamic offset-cancellation techniques. These techniques can reduce the offset of an amplifier by a factor of 100 to 1000 and do not need trimming. Knowledge of these techniques is necessary to improve the accuracy of CMOS smart temperature sensors. Also in this chapter, a new technique is proposed that can even further reduce the offset. This technique is called the “nested chopper technique”. An implementation of this new technique is shown and measurement results are discussed.


Thermal Noise Noise Power Spectrum Source Impedance Instrumentation Amplifier Gain Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [2.1]
    A.J. Williams, R.E. Tarpley and W.R. Clark, “D-C amplifier stabilized for zero and gain”, Trans. AIEE, vol.67, pp.47–57, 1948Google Scholar
  2. [2.2]
    Maxim Integrated Products, “ICL7650, Chopper Stabilized Operational Amplifier”,, June 1999Google Scholar
  3. [2.3]
    Linear Technology, “LTC1050, Precision chopper stabilized operational amplifier with internal capacitors”,, June 1999Google Scholar
  4. [2.4]
    National Semiconductor, “LMC2001, High Precision, 6MHz Rail-To-Rail Output Operational Amplifier”,, June 1999Google Scholar
  5. [2.5]
    J.F. Franca and Y. R. Tsividis, “Design of VLSI Circuits for Telecommunications and Signal Processing”, Prentice Hall, 1991Google Scholar
  6. [2.6]
    C.C. Enz and G.C. Temes, “Circuit techniques for reducing the effects of opamp imperfections: autozeroing, correlated double sampling and chopper stabilization”, Proc. of the IEEE, vol.84, no. 11, pp. 1584–1614, november 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [2.7]
    Texas Instruments, “TLC4501, Self-calibrating operational amplifier”,, May 1999Google Scholar
  8. [2.8]
    C.G. Yu and R.L. Geiger, “An automatic offset compensation scheme with ping-pong control for CMOS operational amplifiers”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.29, pp.601–610, May 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [2.9]
    M. Degrauwe, E.A. Vittoz and I. Verbauwhede, “A micropower CMOS Instrumentation amplifier”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.20, pp.805–807, June 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [2.10]
    C.C. Enz, E.A. Vittoz and F. Krummenacher, “A CMOS chopper amplifier,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.22, pp.335–342, June 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [2.11]
    I.E. Opris and G.T.A. Kovacs, “A rail-to-rail ping-pong opamp”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.31, pp.1320–1324, September 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [2.12]
    K.H. White, D.R. Lampe, F.C. Blaha and I.A. Mack, “Characterization of surface channel CCD image arrays at low light levels,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.9, pp. 1–14, February 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [2.13]
    R.W. Brodersen and S.P Emmons, “Noise in buried channel chargecoupled devices”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.11, pp. 147–156, February 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [2.14]
    C. Menolfi and Q. Huang, A low-noise CMOS instrumentation amplifier for thermoelectric infrared detectors, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.32, pp.968–976, July 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [2.15]
    C. Menolfi and Q. Huang, “A fully integrated CMOS instrumentation amplifier with submicrovolt offset”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.34, pp.415–420, March 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [2.16]
    K.C. Hsieh, P.R. Gray, D. Senderowicz and D.G. Messerschmitt, A low-noise chopper stabilized differential switched-capacitor filtering technique, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.16, pp.708–715, December 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [2.17]
    G.C.M. Meijer, “Concepts and focus point for intelligent sensor systems”, Sensors and Actuators, vol.41, pp.183–191, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [2.18]
    P.C. de Jong, G.C.M. Meijer and A.H.M. van Roermund, “A 300°C dynamic-feedback instrumentation amplifier”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.33, pp. 1999–2009, December 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [2.19]
    A. Bakker and J.H. Huijsing, “Low-offset, low-noise 3.5mW CMOS spinning-current Hall-effect sensor with integrated chopper amplifier”, Proc. Eurosensors XIII, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 1045–1048, September 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Bakker
    • 1
  • Johan Huijsing
    • 2
  1. 1.Philips SemiconductorsTempeUSA
  2. 2.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations