Managing Biosafety Capacity Development: Technical and Political Aspects

  • André de Kathen


Biotechnology and genetic engineering are new tools with the potential to improve agricultural production, create new diagnostics and develop new medicinal applications. But modem biotechnology may not necessarily make everything better in all cases. Indeed, there are important biotechnology safety issues in health, the environment and sustainable development. Also, any debate on biosafety will fail if it does not consider the social, economic and political implications. On the other hand, any risk assessment will also fail if it does not specifically and differentially address potential areas of impact. Finally, successful biosafety capacity building in developing countries will require public and political commitment. This paper examines the current status of biosafety systems in developing countries and suggests a participatory strategy for developing national biosafety frameworks in the light of the Cartagena-Protocol.


Horizontal Gene Transfer World Trade Organization Precautionary Principle None None Transgenic Crop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames, B.N., M. Profet, and L.S. Gold (1990): Nature’s Chemicals and Synthetic Chemicals: Comparative Toxicology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 87, pp. 7782–7786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHIS (2000): Data Sheets Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Depai lurent of Agriculture, Retrieved from the internet: Scholar
  3. van den Daele, W. (1998): Risk Prevention and the Political Control of Genetic Engineering: Lessons from a Participatory Technology Assessment on Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Crops. AgBiotech News and Information 10 (11), pp. 355–358.Google Scholar
  4. Darmency, H. (1994): The Impact of Hybrids Between Genetically Modified Crop Plants and their Related Species: Introgression and Weediness. Molecular Ecology 3, pp. 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daszak, P., A.A. Cunningham, and A.D. Hyatt (2000): Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife — Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science 287, pp. 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2000): Statistics Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Retrieved from the internet: Scholar
  7. Hoyle, B. (1999): Canadian Farmers Seek Compensation for Genetic Pollution. Nature Biotechnology 17, pp. 747–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. IICA (1988): Guidelines for the Use and Safety of Genetic Engineering Techniques or Recombinant DNA Technology. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. James, C. (1999): Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 1999. ISAAA Briefs, No. 12, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  10. James, C. (1997): Global Status of Transgenic Crops in 1997. ISAAA Briefs, No. 5, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Jugessur, S. (1999): Policy Framework for the Development and Application of Biotechnology in Africa. Proceedings of the All Africa Biotechnology Workshop, 8–10 September, Algiers, AlgeriaGoogle Scholar
  12. de Kathen, A. (1999): Transgenic Crops in Developing Countries: A Report on Field Releases, Biosafety Regulations and Environmental Impact Assessment. Texte 58/99. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. Kok E.J., and H.A. Kuiper (1996): Evaluation of Strategies for Food Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Agricultural Products — Information Needs. Food Safety Evaluation, pp. 80–84.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, H.I. (1999): Substantial Equivalence: Its Uses and Abuses. Nature Biotechnology 17, pp. 1042–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, H.I. (1994): Risk-Assessment Experiments and the New Biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology 12, pp. 292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, H.I., and S.L. Huttner (1998): A Baroque Solution to a Nonproblem. Nature Biotechnology 16, pp. 698–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore, P.D. (2000): Alien Invaders. Nature 403, pp. 492–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nap, J.P. (1999): A Transgene-Centered Approach to the Biosafety Assessment of Transgenic Herbicide-Tolerant Crops. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 38, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  19. OECD (1997): Safety Assessment of New Foods: Results of an OECD Survey on Serum Banks for Allergenicity Testing and Use of Databases. General Secretariat, Internal. Coordination Group for Biotechnology, SG/ICGB (97)1, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. Persley, G.J., L.V. Giddings, and C. Juma (1993): Biosafety: The Safe Application of Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Environment. Research Report, No. 5, International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague.Google Scholar
  21. Redenbaugh, K., W. Hiatt, B. Martineau, J. Lindemann, and D. Emlay (1994): Aminoglycoside 3’-Phosphotransferase II (APH(3’)II): Review of its Safety and Use in the Production of Genetically Engineered Plants. Food Biotechnology 8, pp. 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rissler, J., and M. Mellon (1996): The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Sukopp, H., and U. Sukopp (1993): Ecological Long-Term Effects of Cultigens Becoming Feral and of Naturalization of Non-Native Species. Experientia 49, pp. 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Syvanen, M. (1999): In Search for Horizontal Gene Transfer. Nature Biotechnology 17, pp. 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, S.L. (1996): Assessment of the Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods. Document retrieved from the interne: Scholar
  26. Torgersen, H. (1996): Ecological Impacts of Traditional Crop Plants — A Basis for the Assessment of Transgenic Plants? Monograph No. 75, Federal Environment Agency of Austria, Vienna.Google Scholar
  27. Traynor, P.L. (1999): Biosafety Management: Key to the Environmentally Responsible Use of Biotechnology. In: J.I. Cohen (ed.). Managing Agricultural Biotechnology — Addressing Research Program Needs and Policy Implications. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 155–165.Google Scholar
  28. UNDP (1999): Human Development Report 1999. United Nations Development Project, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Virgin, I., and R.J. Frederick (eds.) (1996): Biosafety Capacity Building: Evaluation Criteria Development. Stockholm Environment Institute, Biotechnology Advisory Commission, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • André de Kathen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations