Anesthesia in the Catheterization Laboratory

  • Peter C. Laussen
  • Dolly D. Hansen


Adequate sedation and anesthesia during cardiac catheterization are essential to facilitate acquisition of meaningful hemodynamic data and to assist during interventional procedures. For the most part, hemodynamic or diagnostic catheterization procedures can be performed under sedation in all age groups. While in many interventional procedures such sedation may be appropriate, in ill patients or those procedures that are lengthy or potentially associated with significant hemodynamic compromise, or are prolonged, general anesthesia is preferable.


Respiratory Depression Patent Ductus Arteriosus Balloon Dilation Ventricular Septal Defect Ventricular Septal Defect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baum VC, Palmisano BW. The immature heart and anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1529–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichorn JH, Cooper JB, Gessner JS et al. Anesthesia standards at Harvard: A review. J Clin Anesth 1988;1:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr 1992;89:1110–1115.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friesen RH, Alswand M. End-tidal CO2 monitoring via nasal cannulae in pediatric patients: accuracy and sources of error. J Clin Monitoring 1996; 12(2): 155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs and Committee on Environmental Health. Use of choral hydrate for sedation in children. Pediatr 1993;92:471–473.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hickey PR, Hansen DD, Wessel DL. Pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic responses to fentanyl in infants. Anesth Analg 185;64:483–486.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hickey PR, Hansen DD, Wessel DL, et al. Blunting of stress responses in the pulmonary circulation of infants by fentanyl. Anesth Analg 1985;64:1137–1142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meretoja OA, Rautiainen P. Alfentanil and fentanyl sedation in infants and small children during cardiac catheterization. Can J Anesth 1990;37(6):624–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynn AM. Editorial. Remifentanil: The paediatric anaesthetist’s opiate? Paediatric Anaesthesia 1996;6:433–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morray JP, Lynn AM, Stamm SJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of ketamine in children with congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg 1994;63:895–899.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hickey PR, Hansen DD, Stafford MM, et al. Pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic responses to ketamine in infants with normal and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Anesthesiology 1985;62:287–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berman W Jr, Fripp RR, Rubier M et al. Hemodynamic effects of ketamine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 1990;11(2):72–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maruyama K, Maruyama J, Yokochi A et al. Vasodilatory effects of ketamine on pulmonary arteries in rats with chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Anesth Analg 1995;80:786–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolfe RR, Loehr JP, Scaffer MS et al. Hemodynamic effects of ketamine, hypoxia and hyperoxia in children with surgically treated congenital heart disease residing > 1200 metres above sea level. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:84–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, et al. Propofol: an update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1005–1043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lebovic S, Reich DL, Steinberg LG et al. Comparison of propofol versus ketamine for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Anesth Analg 1992;74:490–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gooding JM, Wang JT, Smith RA, et al. Cardiovascular and pulmonary responses following etomidate induction of anesthesia in patients with demonstrated cardiac disease. Anesth Analg 1979;58:40–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wessel DL, Keane JF, Parness I, et al. Outpatient closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Circ 1988;77:1068–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hickey PR, Wessel DL, Streitz SL, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: hemodynamic complications and anesthetic management. Anesth Analg 1992;74:44–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laussen PC, Hansen DD, Perry SB, et al. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect: hemodynamic instability and anesthetic management. Anesth Analg 1995;80:1076–1082.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renwick J, Kerr C, Mctaggart R, et al. Cardiac electrophysiology and conduction pathway ablation. Can J Anesth 1993;40:1053–1064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharp MD, Dobkowski WB, Murkin JM, et al. Alfentanyl-midazolam anesthesia has no electrophysiological effects upon the normal conduction system or accessory pathways in patients with Wolf Parkinson White syndrome. Can J Anesth 1992;39:816–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharp MD, Dobkowski WB, Murkin JM, et al. The electrophysiological effects of volatile anesthetics and sufentanyl on the normal atrioventricular conduction system and accessory pathways in Wolf Parkinson White syndrome. Anesthesiology 1994;80:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lau W, Kovoor P, Ross DL. Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of midazolam combined with fentanyl. Am J Cardiol 1993;72(2): 177–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharpe MD, Dobkowski WB, Murkin JM et al. Propofol has no direct effect on sino-atrial node function or on normal atrioventricular accessory pathway conduction in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome during alfentanil/midazolam anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995;82:888–895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hermann T, Vettermen J. Change of ectopic supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm during administration of propofol. Anesth Analg 1985;64:693–99.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lavoie J, Walsh EP, Burrows FA, et al. The effects of propofol or isoflurane anesthesia on cardiac conduction in children undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachydysrhythmias. Anesthesiology 1995;82:884–887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimmerman AA, Ibrahim AE, Epstein MR, et al. The effects of halothane and sevoflurane on cardiac electrophysiology in children undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. Anesthesiology 1997;87:A1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Laussen
  • Dolly D. Hansen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations