Catheterization of the Adult Patient with Congenital Heart Disease

  • Michael J. Landzberg


Adult patients with congenital heart (ACH) disease are a product of medical and surgical advances of the second half of the twentieth century. A review at our own institution revealed that the 17-year survival of those born with all types of congenital heart disease was 84%. Despite the achievements of pediatric caregivers, many of these patients, particularly those with complex lesions, face a world not yet fully prepared for their adult care. Throughout the stages of their adolescent and adult years, congenital heart disease “survivors” present with problems often different from those encountered in their pediatric lives. Novel medical, surgical and catheter-based diagnostics and therapeutics have led to an increased use of the catheterization laboratory in the management of these patients. While simple defects predominated in the catheterization laboratory three decades ago, a marked shift toward more complex lesions was evident 20 years later 1. In the past decade however, with the advent of interventional procedures, simple lesions such as pulmonary stenosis, patent ductus arteriosus and atrial septal defect are once again being catheterized.


Congenital Heart Disease Patent Ductus Arteriosus Transcatheter Closure Cryptogenic Stroke Coronary Artery Fistula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Flanagan MF, Leatherman GF, Caris A, et al. Changing trends of congenital heart disease in adults: A catheterization laboratory perspective. Cath and Cardiovasc Diag. 1986, 12:215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flanagan MF, Hourihan M, Keane JF. Incidence of renal dysfunction in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991, 68:403–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kreutzer J, Keane JF, Lock JE, et al. Conversion of modified Fontan procedure to lateral atrial tunnel. The J of Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1996,111: 1169–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prieto LR, Foreman CK, Cheeatham JP, et al. Intermediate-Term Outcome of Transcatheter Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Closure Using the Bard Clamshell Septal Umbrella. Brief Reports 1996, 1310–1312.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sideris EB, Leung M, Yoon JH, et al. Occlusion of large atrial septal defects with a centering buttoned device: Early clinical experience. Am Heart J 1996,131:356–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sievert H, Babic UU, Ensslen R, et al. Transcatheter Closure of Large Atrial Septal Defects With the Babic System. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995, 36:232–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mas JL, Zuber M. Recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both, and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am Heart J 1995, 130:1083–1088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bogousslavsky J, Garazi S, Jeanrenaud X, et al. Stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale. Neurology 1996, 46:1301–1305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mugge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C, et al. Atrial Septal Aneurysm in Adult Patients (A Multicenter Study Using Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography). Circulation 1995, 91:2785–2792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nendaz MR, Sarasin FP, Junod AF. Preventing stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale: Antithrombotic therapy, foramen closure, or therapeutic abstention? A decision analytic perspective. Am Heart J 1997, 135:532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bridges ND, Hellenbrand W, Latson L, et al: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism. Circulation 1992, 86:1902–08.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landzberg MJ, Sloss LJ, Faherty CE, et al. Orthodeoxia-Platypnea Due to Intracardiac Shunting-Relief with Transcatheter Double Umbrella Closure. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995, 36: 247–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrison DA, Benson LN, Lazzam C, et al. Percutaneous Catheter Closure of the Persistently Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Adult. Am J Cardiol 1996,77:1094–1097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sievert H, Ensslen A, Fach H, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus with the Rashkind occluder (Acute results and angiographic follow-up in adults). Eur Heart J 1997, 18:1014–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hijazi ZM, Geggel RL. Transcatheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Using Coils. Am J Cardiol 1997, 77:1279–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Podnar T, Masura J. Percutaneous Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Using Special Screwing Detachable Coils. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997, 41:386–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farhouch B, Moore JW. Balloon occlusion delivery technique for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Am Heart J 1997, 133:601–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ing FF, Recto MR, Saidi A, et al. A Method Providing Bidirectional Control of Coil delivery in Occlusions of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Shallow Ampulla and Potts’ Shunts. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79:1561–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huggon IC, Qureshi SA. Is the prevention of infective endarteritis a valid reason for closure of the patent arterial duct? Eur Heart J 1997, 18:364–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thilen U, Astrom-Olsson K. Does the risk of infective endarteritis justify routine patent ductus arteriosus closure? Eur Heart J 1997, 18:503–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landzberg MJ, Lock JE. Transcatheter management of ventricular septal rupture after myocardial infarction. Sem Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1998, 10:128–132.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenfeld HM, Landzberg MJ, Perry SB, Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in the Young Adult with Congenital Aortic Stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1994, 73:1112–1116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandhu SK, Lloyd TR, Crowley DC, et al. Effectiveness of Balloon Valvuloplasty in the Young Adult with Congenital Aortic Stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995, 36:122–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minich LL, Tani LY, Hawkins JA, et al. Use of Echocardiography for Detecting Aortic Valve Leaflet Avulsion and Predicting Repair Potential After Balloon Valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995, 75:533–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kasab SA, Ribeiro PA, Zailbag MA, et al. Percutaneous Double Balloon Pulmonary Valvotomy in Adults: One-to Two-Year Follow-Up. Am J Cardiol 1988, 62:822–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herrmann HC, Hill JA, Krol J, et al. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty in Adults with Pulmonic Valve Stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1991, 68:1111–1113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaul UA, Singh B, Tyagi S, et al. Long-term results after balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty in adults. Am Heart J 1993, 126:1152–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28..
    Teupe CHJ, Burger W, Schrader R, et al. Late (Five to Nine Years) Follow-Up After Balloon Dilation of Valvular Pulmonary Stenosis in Adults.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen CR, Cheng TO, Huang T, et al. Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty for Pulmonic Stenosis in Adolescents and Adults. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:21–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tyagi S, Arora R, Kaul UP, et al. Balloon Angioplasty of native coarctation of the aorta in adolescents and young adults. Am Heart J 1992, 123:674–680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fawzy ME, Dunn B, Galal O, et al. Balloon coarctation and angioplasty in adolescents and adults: Early and intermediate results. Am Heart J 1992, 124:167–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCrindle BW, Jones TK, Morrow WR, et al. Acute Results of Balloon Angioplasty of Native Coarctation Versus Recurrent Aortic Obstruction Are Equivalent. JACC 1996,28:1810–1817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Giovanni JV, Lip GYH, Osman K, et al. Percutaneous Balloon Dilatation of Aortic Coarctation in Adults. AJC 1996,77:435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fawzy ME, Sivanandam V, Galal O, et al. One-to-Ten Year Follow-Up Results of Balloon Angioplasty of Native Coarctation of the Aorta in Adolescents and Adults. JACC 1997,30:1534–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shim D, Lloyd TR, Moorehead CP, Bove EL, Mosca RS, Beekman RH. Comparison of Hospital Charges for Balloon Angioplasty and Surgical Repair in Children With Native Coarctation of the Aorta. JACC 1997, 79:1143–1146.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rao PS, Galal O, Wilson AD. Feasibility and effectiveness of repeated balloon dilatation of restenosed congenital obstructions after previous balloon valvuloplasty/angioplasty. Am Heart J 1996,132:403–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thanopoulos BV, Triposkiadis F, Margetakis A, Mullins CE. Long segment coarctation of the thoracic aorta: Treatment with multiple balloon-expandable stent implantation. Am Heart J 1997,133:470–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saidi A, Bezold L, Altman C, Aynes N, Bricker JT. Outcome of pregnancy following intervention for coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol 1998: 82:786–788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Landzberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations