Abstract
Chapter 9 presented an evaluation of the AHP, the revised AHP, the WPM, and the TOPSIS methods in terms of two evaluative criteria. Another evaluation was presented in Chapter 10 for the AHP and the revised AHP methods. The issue of evaluating MCDM methods is a controversial one in the decision analysis / decision making communities. This chapter is partially based on some recent developments that are presented in [Triantaphyllou, 2000] and are related to the evaluation of MCDM methods. The present chapter continues on the same subject and presents some new ranking abnormalities when the AHP and some of its variants are used.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). More Cases of Ranking Abnormalities when some MCDM Methods are used. In: Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4838-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3157-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive