Usability

  • Kathy Momtahan
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Usability is defined as “the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use” (ISO, 1994, p. 2). There are 17 parts to the ISO usability standard, and many of these parts are still works in progress (see Chapter 15). This chapter presents an overview of usability testing methodologies. An example of the application of one type of usability testing method, called heuristic evaluation, in the hospital setting is presented. Related websites are listed where appropriate.

Keywords

Usability Testing Computer Interface Usability Expert Heuristic Evaluation Infrastructure Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1993; 38: 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fitts, P.M. Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic-control system. Report No. 593420. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 1951.Google Scholar
  3. Gilbreth, L.E. The Psychology of Management: The Function of the Mind in Determining, Teaching and Installing Methods of Least Waste. New York: Sturgis, 1914.Google Scholar
  4. International Standards Organization. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability (draft standard). ISO/DIS 9241–11. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Landauer, T.K. The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Lin, H.X., Choong, Y., and Salvendy, G. A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems. Behaviour Information Technology 1997; 16 (4/5): 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu, Y. Software-user interface design. In: Salvendy G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997: 1689–1724.Google Scholar
  8. Lowery, J.C., and Martin, J.B. Evaluation of healthcare software from a usability perspective. Journal of Medical Systems 1990; 14 (1/2): 17–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luczak, H. Task analysis. In: Salvendy G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997: 340–416.Google Scholar
  10. Microsoft. The Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design. Radmond, WA: Microsoft Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Momtahan, K.L. Introducing new technology into hospitals—A case study of pharmacy automation during hospital restructuring. Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. MuSiC. Metrics for usability standards in computing (ESPRIT II Project 5429 ). National Physical Laboratory, UK, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. Nielsen, J. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proceedings ACM CHI ‘82 Conference (Monterey, CA, May 3–7), 1992: 373–380.Google Scholar
  14. Nielson, J. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proceedings ACM CHI ‘84 Conference (Boston, MA, April 24–28 ), 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Nielson, J. Usability testing. In: Salvendy G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997: 1543–1568.Google Scholar
  16. Nielson, J., and Mack, R.L. Usability Inspection Methods. New York: Wiley, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Nielson, J., and Molich, R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings ACM CHI ‘80 Conference (Seattle, WA, April 1–5), 1990: 249–256.Google Scholar
  18. Norman, D.A. Some observations on mental modes. In: Gentner, D., and Stevens, A.L. (eds.) Mental Models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. Oppermann, R., and Reiterer, H. Software evaluation using the 9241 evaluator. Behaviour Information Technology 1997; 16 (4/5): 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scapin, D.L., and Bastien, J.M.C. Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behaviour Information Technology 1997; 16 (4/ 5): 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharit, J. Allocation of functions. In: Salvendy G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997: 301–339.Google Scholar
  22. Wickens, C.D., and Carswell, C.M. Information processing. In: Salvendy G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997: 89–129.Google Scholar

Additional Resources

  1. Carroll, J.M. Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology 1997; 48: 61–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Scapin, D.L., and Berns, T. (eds.) Usability evaluation methods. Behaviour Information Technology 1997;16(4/5) (Special issue).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Momtahan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations