Applications of Statics to Biomechanics
The human body is rigid in the sense that it can maintain a posture, and flexible in the sense that it can change its posture and move. The flexibility of the human body is due primarily to the joints, or articulations, of the skeletal system. The primary function of joints is to provide mobility to the musculoskeletal system. In addition to providing mobility, a joint must also possess a degree of stability. Since different joints have different functions, they possess varying degrees of mobility and stability. Some joints are constructed so as to provide optimum mobility. For example, the construction of the shoulder joint (balland socket) enables the arm to move in all three planes (triaxial motion). However, this high level of mobility is achieved at the expense of reduced stability, increasing the vulnerability of the joint to injuries, such as dislocations. On the other hand, the elbow joint provides movement primarily in one plane (uniaxial motion), but is more stable and less prone to injuries than the shoulder joint. The extreme case of increased stability is achieved at joints that permit no relative motion between the bones constituting the joint. The contacting surfaces of the bones in the skull are typical examples of such joints.
KeywordsPatellar Tendon Muscle Force Achilles Tendon Ground Reaction Force Elbow Joint
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chaffin, D.B., and Andersson, G.B.J. 1991. Occupational Biomechanics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Goel, V.K., Weinstein, J.N. 1990. Biomechanics of the Spine: Clinical and Surgical Perspective.: Boston Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- LeVeau, B.F. 1992. Williams & Lissner’s Biomechanics of Human Motion. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
- McMinn, R.M.H., Hutchings, R.T. 1988. Color Atlas of Human Anatomy. 2nd ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Nordin, M., Andersson, G.B.J., Pope, M.H. (Eds.) 1997. Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace: Principles & Practice. Philadelphia: MosbyYear Book, Inc.Google Scholar
- Nordin, M., and Frankel, V.H. 1989. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
- Roebuck, J.A. 1995. Anthropometric Methods: Designing to Fit the Human Body. Monographs in Human Factors and Ergonomics: Alphonse Chapanis, Series Editor. Santa Monica: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
- Simon, S.R. (Ed.) 1994. Orthopaedic Basic Science. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.Google Scholar
- Thompson, C.W. 1989. Manual of Structural Kinesiology. 11 th ed. St. Louis, MO: Times Mirror/Mosby.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J.R., Corlett, E. N. (Eds.) 1995. Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology. 2 nd ed. Bristol, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Winter, D.A. 1990. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Behavior. 2 nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar