Long Term Results of Bladder Exstrophy

The London Experience
  • C. R. J. Woodhouse
Chapter

Abstract

Classical exstrophy has been recognised for about 2000 years and has been the subject of voluminous surgical literature since the middle of the last century. Contemporary surgery for this condition has developed on the basis of ideas formed nearly a century ago. The posterior pelvic osteotomy and bladder reconstruction used by Trendelenburg in Leipzig at the turn of the century is similar to that used today. He also mentioned that Thiersch had implanted a ‘special mechanical contrivance’ to maintain continence after reconstruction which sounds like a fixed pressure artificial sphincter.1 The photographs in Trendelenburg’s paper show a very acceptable cosmetic result and a young boy able to void with a most impressive stream from very normal looking penis. As so often, it is not the surgical ideas that have changed with time, but the materials and drugs necessary to support those ideas.

Keywords

Ultra Sound Uterine Prolapse Female Genitalia Artificial Urinary Sphincter Bladder Exstrophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Trendelenburg F: The treatment of ectopia vesicae. Ann Surg 1906, 44: 281–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayo C H, Hendricks W A: Exstrophy of the bladder. Surg Gyne Obstet 1926, 43: 129–134.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Megali M, Lattimer J K: Review of the management of 140 cases of exstrophy of the bladder. J Urol 1973, 109: 246–248.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woodhouse C R J, Ransley P G, Williams D I: The patient with exstrophy in adult life. Brit J Urol 1983, 55: 632–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Segura J W Kelalis P P: Long term results of ureterosigmoidostomy in children with bladder exstrophy. J Urol 1975, 114: 138–140.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stewart M: Urinary diversion and bowel cancer. Ann Royal Coll Surg (England) 1986, 68: 98–102.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strachan J R, Woodhouse C R J: Malignancy in exstrophy patients following ureterosigmoidostomy. Brit J Surg 1991, 78: 1216–1218.StrachanGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall V F, Muecke E C: Functional closure of typical exstrophy of the bladder. J Urol 1970, 104: 205–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woodhouse CRJ, Redgrave: Late failure of the reconstructed exstrophy bladder. Brit J Urol 1996, 77: 590–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollowell J G, Hill P D, Duffy P G, et al. A preliminary report: bladder function and dysfunction in exstrophy. Lancet 1991, 338: 926–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woodhouse C R J, Hinsch R: The anatomy and reconstruction of the adult female genitalia in classical bladder exstrophy. Brit J Urol 1997, 79: in press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ship A G, Pelzer R H: Reconstruction of the female escutcheon in exstrophy of the bladder. Plast Reconst Surg 1972, 49: 643–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marconi F, Messina P, Pavanello P, et al: Cosmetic reconstruction of the mons veneris and lower abdominal wall by skin expansion as the last stage of surgical treatment of bladder exstrophy. Plast Reconst Surg 1993, 91: 551–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fid J F, Rosenberg P, Rothaus K, et al: The use of tissue expanders in the final reconstruction of infra pubic midline scar, mons pubis and vulva after bladder exstrophy repair. Urology 1993, 41: 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stein R, Fisch M, Bauer H, et al: Operative reconstruction of the extemal and internal genitalia in female patients with bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias. J Urol 1995, 154: 1002–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krisiloff M, Puchner P J, Tretter W, Macfarlane M T, Lattimer J K: Pregnancy in women with exstrophy. J Urol 1978, 119: 478–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dewhurst J, Topliss P H, Shepherd J H: Ivalon sponge hysteropexy for genital prolapse in patients with bladder exstrophy. Brit J Obst Gynaecol 1980, 87: 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blakeley C R, Mills W G: The obstetric and gynaecological complications of bladder exstrophy and epispadias. Brit J Obst Gynaecol 1981, 88: 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farkas A G, Shepherd J H, Woodhouse C R J: Hysterosacropexy for uterine prolapse associated with urinary tract abnormalities. J Obstet Gynaecol 1993, 13: 358–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clemston C A B: Ectopia vesicae and split pelvis. J Obstet Gynaecol 1958, 65: 973–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woodhouse C R J: The sexual and reproductive consequences of congenital genitourinary anomalies. J Urol 1994, 152: 645–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shapiro E, Lepor H, Jeffs R D: The inheritance of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol 1984, 132: 308–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pocock R D, Witcombe J B, Andrews H S, Berry P J, Frank J D: The outcomes of antenatally diagnosed urological abnormalities. Brit J Urol 1985, 57: 788–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. J. Woodhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of UrologyThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations