The Failed Exstrophy Closure

Strategies for Management—the Johns Hopkins Experience
  • John P. Gearhart
  • Ranjiv Mathews
Chapter

Abstract

Secure initial bladder closure is a critical first step in the reconstruction of the patient with bladder exstrophy. The potential for gain in bladder capacity to allow later bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) appears to be dependent on success of initial closure. Increases in bladder capacity occurred more rapidly and higher continence rates (83%) correlated with successful primary closure.1 Once primary repair fails the potential for continence drops markedly. With more than two failed closures only 23% of patients gain adequate capacity for BNR and only 50% of these attain continence.2

Keywords

Outlet Obstruction Bladder Capacity Urethral Stricture Johns Hopkins Hospital Pediatric Urology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Oesterling JE, Jeffs RD: The importance of successful initial closure in the surgical management of classical bladder exstrophy: analysis of 144 patients treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1975 and 1985. J Urol., 137: 258–262 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gearhart JP, Ben-Chaim J, Sciortino C, Sponsellor PD, Jeffs RD: The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure: What affects the potential of the bladder? Urology 47 (2): 240–243 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Husmann DA, McLorie GA, Churchill BM: Closure of the exstrophic bladder: evaluation of the factors leading to success and its importance in urinary continence. J Urol., 142: 522–525 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gearhart J.P.: Bladder and urachal abnormalities: The exstrophy-epispadias complex. In: Clinical Pediatric Urology 3`’ ed. Eds. Kelalis P.P., King L.R., Belman A.B.; WB Saunders Co p 579.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gearhart JP, Peppas DS, Jeffs RD: The failed exstrophy closure: Strategy for management. Br J Urol., 71: 217–220 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD: Management of the failed exstrophy closure. J Urol., 146: 610 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sponsellor PD, Bisson LS, Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD, Majid D, Fishman E: The anatomy of the pelvis in the exstrophy complex. J Bone Joint Surg., 77: 177 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gearhart JP, Forschner DC, Jeffs RD, Ben-Chaim J, Sponsellor PD: A combined vertical and horizontal pelvic osteotomy approach for primary and secondary repair of bladder exstrophy. J Urol., 155: 689–693 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathews R, Taylor S, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP: Combined bladder closure and epispadias repair in the management of classic bladder exstrophy. Submitted for publication J Urol. 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gearhart J.P. Jeffs R.D.: State-of-the-art reconstructive surgery for bladder exstrophy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Am J Dis Child 143: 1475, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Gearhart
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ranjiv Mathews
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric UrologyBrady Urological InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute Division of Pediatric UrologyJohns Hopkins Hospital and School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations