Listing’s Plane Orientation with Vergence

Effect of Disparity and Accommodation
  • Z. Kapoula
  • M. Bernotas
  • T. Haslwanter
Chapter

Abstract

According to Listing’s law, all eye positions can be reached from the reference position by rotations about axes which lie in a plane, provided the head is stationary (Helm-holtz 1867; Ruete 1853). It is known that when the eyes converge upon proximal targets Listing’s law still holds but Listing’s plane rotates temporally. This causes elevation-dependent torsion: the eyes intort for up proximal gaze and extort for down proximal gaze (Mikhael et al. 1995; Minken and Van Gisbergen 1994; Mok et al. 1992; Van Rijn and Van den Berg 1993). In the following, we will call the tilt of Listing’s plane as a function of vergence Listings Plane Vergence Tilt (LPVT). The functional significance of the LPVT is not clear. In his comprehensive study, Tweed (1997) gives several possible interpretations. A first hypothesis would be that LPVT is a strategy for motor efficiency, allowing to keep the eyes in an eccentric position with minimal effort. A second hypothesis associates that tilt with a functional role for binocular vision, e.g. to obtain binocular single vision of lines orthogonal to Listing’s plane or, more likely, to reduce the cyclodisparities of the visual planes themselves. A third hypothesis states that it might be both a strategy for motor efficiency as well as a strategy subserving binocular visual function.

Keywords

Binocular Vision Temporal Rotation Binocular Disparity Search Coil Midsagittal Plane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruno P, Van den Berg AV (1997) Relative orientation of primary position of the two eyes. Vision Res 37:935–947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collewijn H, Van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15:447–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haslwanter T (1995) Mathematics of 3-dimensional eye rotations. Vision Res 35: 1727–1739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haustein W (1989) Considerations on Listing’s law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control. Biol Cybern 60:411–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helmholtz H (1867). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss. English translation: Helmholtz’ treatise on physiological optics. New York: Dover (1962).Google Scholar
  6. Hess BJ, Van Opstal AJ, Straumann D, Hepp K (1992) Calibration of three-dimensional eye position using search coil signals in the rhesus monkey. Vision Res 32:1647–1654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kapoula Z, Eggert T, Bucci MP (1996) Disconjugate adaptation of the vertical oculomotor system. Vision Res 36:2735–2745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mays LE, Gamlin PDR (1995) Neural circuitry controlling the rear response. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5(6):763–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mikhael S, Nicole D, Vilis T (1995) Rotation of Listing’s plane by horizontal, vertical and oblique prism-induced vergence. Vision Res 35:3243–3254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Minken AWH, Van Gisbergen JAM (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of vergence movements at various level of elevation. Exp Brain Res 101:331–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mok D, Ro A, Cadera W, Crawford JD, Vilis T (1992) Rotation of Listing’s plane during vergence. Vision Res 32:2055–2064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10:137–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruete CGT (1853) Lehrbuch der Ophthalmologic Braunschweig:36–37.Google Scholar
  14. Semmlow JL, Hung G (1983). The near response. Theories of control. In Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects (ed. C. Schor and K. Ciuffreda), pp. 175–195, Boston, Butterworths.Google Scholar
  15. Schor CM, Kotulak JC (1986) Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Res 26: 927–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tweed D (1997) Visual-motor optimization in binocular control. Vision Res 37:1939–1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Rijn LJ, Van den Berg AV (1993) Binocular eye orientation during fixations: Listing’s law extended to include eye vergence. Vision Res 33:691–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Von Noorden GK (1990) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Theory and management of strabismus (4th edn.) St Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Kapoula
    • 1
  • M. Bernotas
    • 2
  • T. Haslwanter
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l’ActionCNRS-College de France UMR 9950ParisFrance
  2. 2.Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of SiauliaiSiauliaiLithuania
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations