Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Quality of Life Issues
  • Lorraine Choi
  • Windsor Ting
  • Prashant Sinha
Part of the Contemporary Cardiology book series (CONCARD)


In addition to the achievements in technique and technology that off-pump myocardial revascularization presents, minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) has subtly made quality of life (QOL) a major concern of cardiac surgeons around the world. Advances in treatment and the subsequent decline in CABG surgery mortality rates over the last 20 yr introduced a need to incorporate these subjective measures in studies evaluating treatment efficacy (1). The most recent elevation of QOL to the forefront of the medical decision-making process stems directly from the unfailing invocation of patient preference as a primary benefit balancing the known risks of MICABG. This may present a renewed opportunity to commit the focus of medicine more closely and consistently toward patient preferences for outcomes.


Leave Anterior Descend Nottingham Health Profile Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Duke Activity Status Index Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lachat M, Vogt PR, Miederhauser U, Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass techniques as adjunct to extracardiac procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: S61 — S63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ovrum E, Tangen G, Am Holen E. Facing the era of minimally invasive coronary grafting: current results of conventional bypass grafting for single vessel disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 159–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goy JJ, Eeckout E, Burnand B, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet 1994; 343: 1449–1453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zenati M, Domit TM, Saul M, et al. Resource utilization for minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: S84 - S87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, Wirkus M, Weaver WE. Comparison of presentation, treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the myocardial infarction triage and intervention registry). Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 9–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergelson BA, Tommaso CL. Gender differences in clinical evaluation and triage in coronary artery disease. Chest 1995; 108: 1510–1513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majeed FA, Cook DG. Age and sex differences in the management of ischemic heart disease. Public Health 1996; 1010: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loop FD, Golding LR, Macmillan JP, Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Sheldon WC. Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: analysis of risks and long-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1: 383–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Buth KJ, et al. Is body size the cause for poor outcomes of coronary artery bypass operations in women? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 1344–1358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardson JV, Cyros RJ. Reduced efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting in women. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 42: S16 - S21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Artinian NT, Duggan CH. Sex differences in patient recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 1995; 24: 483–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carey JS, Cukingnan RA, Singer LKM. Health status after myocardial revascularization: inferior results in women. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 112–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glock Y, Faik M, Laghzaoui A, Moali I, Roux D, Fournial G. Cardiac surgery in the ninth decade of life. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4: 241–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheitlin MD. Coronary bypass surgery in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1996; 12: 195–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chocron S, Rude N, Dubussaucy A, et al. Quality of life after open heart surgery in patients over 75 years old. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 8–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glower DD, Christopher TD, Milano CA, et al. Performance status and outcome after coronary bypass grafting in persons aged 80 to 93 years. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 567–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cane ME, Chen C, Bailey BM, et al. CABG in octagenarians: early and late events and actuarial survival in comparison with a matched population. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1033–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heyer EJ, Delphin E, Adams D, et al. Cerebral dysfunction after cardiac operations in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1716–1722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sollano J, Greene R, Williams D, Cannavale G. A model for determining cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in octagenarians. Abstract presented at the International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care Thirteenth Annual Meeting. May 1997; Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murphy SF, Nickerson NJ, Kouchoukos NT. Functional outcome in the elderly after coronary artery surgery. Medsurg Nurs. 1996; 5: 107–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Projections of the Population of the United States by Age, Sex, and Race 1983 to 2080. Washington D.C., U.S. D.partment of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 984; Current Population Reports, Population Estimates and Projection Series P-25. No. 952.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM, Flavin TF, Emery AW Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: experimental and clinical experiences. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: S48 - S52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohr R, Moshkovitz Y, Gurevitch J, Bnetto FJ. Reoperative coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: S40 - S43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moshkovitz Y, Sternik L, Paz Y, Primary coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in impaired left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 997; 63: S44 - S47.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Subramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1638–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: S72 — S75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nielsen D, Sellgren J, Ricksten SE. Quality of life after cardiac surgery complicated by multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 52–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, Hampton JR, For the RITA Trial Participants. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. Circulation 1996; 94: 135–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1984; 38: 156–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Soc Health Illness 1980; 2: 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hlatky MA, Rogers WJ, Johnstone I, et al. Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 92–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MG, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 651–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gundle M, Reeves B, Tate S, Raft D, McLaurin L. Psychosocial outcomes after coronary artery surgery. Am J Psychol 1980; 137: 159–154.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eriksson J. Psychometric aspects of coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective study of 101 male patients. Acta Psychiatr Scan Suppl 1988; 340: 1–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sjoland H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Haglid M, Westbeg S, Herlitz J. Improvement in quality of life and exercise capacity after coronary artery bypass surgery. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 265–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sjoland H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Albertsson P, Herlitz J. Relationship between quality of life and exercise test findings after coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 1995; 51: 221–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chocron S, Etievent JP, Viel JF, et al. Prospective study of quality of life before and after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 61: 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorraine Choi
  • Windsor Ting
  • Prashant Sinha

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations