Computer-Augmented Environments: The Workplace

  • Joseph Migga Kizza
Part of the Undergraduate Texts in Computer Science book series (UTCS)


The advent of computer technology in our daily lives has created two worlds for humanity: the unreal world of virtual reality (VR), which through simulation lets people live a few minutes of a fantasy facilitated by computer-driven devices such as head-worn goggles and hand-fitting gloves, and a real computer technology-driven world, which augments our familiar environment and makes our daily activities easier and more enjoyable. Because we spend most of our lives either in our homes, work, or schools, these environments have been the focus of this computer-augmented environment technology. Although the workplace and schools have seen the greatest influx of computer technology in the last ten years, with advances in communication the home is also slowly turning into a hub of technology. The philosophy and aim of this technology has been and still is to make life easy for users wherever they are.


Electronic Monitoring Monitor Group Home Office Repetitive Strain Injury Employee Morale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gottieb, C.C., and A. Borodin. Social Issues in Computing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olson, Margrethe, and Henry Lucas. “The Impact of Office Automation on the Organization: Some Implications for Research and Practice.” Communications of the ACM, 25 (11), 1982, pp. 838–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snizek, William. “Virtual Office: Some Neglected Considerations.” Communications of the ACM, 38 (9), 1995, pp. 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chattanooga Free Press, January 7, 1996, p. F2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraut, Robert. “Predicting the Use of Technology: The Case of Telework.” In Chuck Huff and Thomas Finholt (eds.), Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in Its Place. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 312–334.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porat, M. “The Information Economy: Definitions and Managements.” U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Report, U.S. Government Printing Office. Stock number 003–000–00512–7, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Attewell, Paul, and James Rule. “Computing and Organization: What We Know and What We Don’t Know.” Communications of the ACM, 27 (12), 1984, pp. 1184–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Driscoll, J. “Office Automation: The Dynamics of a Technological Boondoge.” In Robert M. Landau, James H. Bair, and Jean H. Siegman (eds.), Emerging Office Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nussbaum, Karen. “Computer Monitoring: A Threat to the Right to Privacy.” In Ray Dejoie, Geroge Fowler, and David Paradice (eds.), Ethical Issues in Information Systems. Boston: Boyd & Fraser, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adler P. A., L.K. Parsons, and S.B. Zolke. “Employee Privacy: Legal and Research Developments and Implications for Personal Administration.” In Chuck Huff and Thomas Finholt (eds.), Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in its Place. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 312–334.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant, Rebecca, Christopher Higgins, and Richard Irving. “Computerized Performance Monitors: Are They Costing You Customers?” In Chuck Huff and Thomas Finholt (eds.), Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in Its Place. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 312–334.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Irving, R. H., C. A. Higgins, and F.R. Safayeni. “Computerized Performance Monitoring Systems: Use and Abuse.”Communications of the ACM, 29 (8), 1986, pp. 794–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shepard, John. Automation and Alienation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leveson, Nancy. Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grandjean, Etienne. Ergonomics in Computerized Offices. London: Taylor & Francis, 1987.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ivancevich, John, Albert Napier, and James Wetherbe. “Occupation Stress, Attitudes, and Health: Problems in the Information Systems Professions.” Communications of the ACM, 26 (10), 1983, pp. 800–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Bailyn, Lotte. “Towards a Perfect Workplace.” Communications of the ACM, 32 (4), 1989, pp. 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Flynn, L. “They Are Watching You: Electronic Surveillence of Workers Raises Privacy Concerns.” San Jose Mercury News,June 13, 1993, p. IF.Google Scholar
  3. Payser, Marc. “When E-mail Is Oops-Mail: Think Your Private Messages Are Private? Think Again.” Newsweek, October 16, 1995. p. 82.Google Scholar
  4. Sauter, Steven, Mark Gottlieb, Karen Jones, Vernon Dodson, and Kathryn Rohner. “Job and Health Implications of VDT Use: Initial Results of the Wisconsin NIOSH Study.” Communications of the ACM, 26 (4), 1983, pp. 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Migga Kizza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations