Methodological Issues in Child Maltreatment Research

  • Robert T. Ammerman
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)


In 1993, the National Research Council (Panel on Research on Child Abuse and Neglect) published the findings and recommendations of a distinguished group of established researchers in child maltreatment. The purpose of this document was to summarize and integrate extant research findings, and to establish goals and suggestions for future scientific study of the abuse and neglect of children. Among other things, the Panel lamented the significant methodological shortcomings that characterized the empirical literature up to that point: “The research literature in the field of child maltreatment is immense... Despite this quantity of literature, researchers generally agree that the quality of research on child maltreatment is relatively weak in comparison to health and social science research studies in areas such as family systems and child development” (p. 45). Indeed, they pointed out that research on child abuse and neglect was largely “undervalued,” and that limited resources allocated to empirical investigations, coupled with the comparatively nascent development both theoretically and methodologically in the child maltreatment field, conspired to limit both the quantity and quality of empirical work in this area. Despite this caveat, a considerable body of work has accrued in the past 35 years, and we now know more about the causes, consequences, and treatment of child abuse and neglect than we ever have before. Considerable work awaits researchers in this area, however, offering both substantial challenges and potential rewards in terms of understanding and preventing maltreatment of children.


Child Maltreatment Child Physical Abuse Behavioral Parent Training Data Analytic Strategy Intervention Outcome Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ammerman, R. T., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (1987). Child Abuse and Neglect Interview Schedule. Unpublished instrument, Western Pennsylvania School for Blind Children, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  2. Ammerman, R. T., Hersen, M, & Lubetsky, M. J. (1996, November). Difficulties in implementing interventions in chronic child maltreatment. In J. R. Lutzker (Chairperson), Child abuse and neglect: The cutting edge. Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capaldi, D., & Patterson, G. R. (1987). An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 169–178.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (1996). A treatment outcome study for sexually abused preschool children: Initial findings. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 42–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohn, A. E., & Daro, D. (1987). Is treatment too late: What ten years of evaluative research tell us. Special Issue: Child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis, P. A., Boyd, J. D., Liepold, M., & Petit, M. (1995). Child abuse and neglect: A look at the states. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
  8. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Twentyman, C. T. (1986). Child abuse and psychotherapy research: Merging social concerns and empirical investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garbarino, J. (1990). Future directions. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Children at risk: An evaluation of factors contributing to child abuse and neglect(pp. 291–298). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gelles, R. J. (1992). Poverty and violence toward children. Behavioral Scientist, 35, 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giovannoni, J. (1989). Definitional issues in child maltreatment. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect(pp. 3–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrenkohl, R. C. (1990). Research directions related to child abuse and neglect. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Children at risk: An evaluation of factors contributing to child abuse and neglect(pp. 85–108). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Kazlin, A. E. (1990). Psychotherapy for children and adolescents. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 21–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kadin, A. E. (Ed.). (1992). Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  16. Kolko, D. J. (1996). Child physical abuse. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. A. Bulkley, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment(pp. 21–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Lutzker, J. R. (1990). Project 12-ways: Treating child abuse and neglect from an ecobehavioral perspective. In R. F. Dangel & R. F. Polster (Eds.), Parent training: Foundations of research and practice(pp. 260–291). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mohr, D. C. (1995). Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Research Council. (1993). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Reid, J. B., Kavanagh, K., & Baldwin, D. V. (1987). Abusive parent’s perceptions of child problem behaviors: An example of parental bias. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 457–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serketich, W. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1996). The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 27, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Socolar, R. R. S., Runyan, D. K., & Amaya-Jackson, L. (1995). Methodological and ethical issues related to studying child maltreatment. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring family conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. VandenBos, G. R. (1996). Guest editor. Special issue: Outcome assessment of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 51, 1005–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weisz, J. R, Weiss, B., Alicke, M. D., & Klotz, M. L. (1987). Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A meta analysis for clinicians. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 542–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weisz, J., Donenberg, G., Han, S., & Weiss, B. (1995). Bridging the gap between the lab and the clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 688–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Widom, G S. (1988). Sampling biases and implications for child abuse research. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 260–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuravin, S. J. (1991). Research definitions of child physical abuse and neglect: Current problems. In R. Starr & D. Wolfe (Eds.), The effects of child abuse and neglect: Issues and research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert T. Ammerman
    • 1
  1. 1.Hahnemann School of MedicineAllegheny University of the Health SciencesPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations