Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To Control or Not to Control

  • Chapter
Personal Control in Action

Part of the book series: The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology ((SSSC))

Abstract

To have control over an event means exercising authority and influence over it by directing and regulating it oneself. Obviously, events differ in their amenability to control. We cannot change the order of days in the week; our influence on our own health is greater but still limited. We may have almost total control over the amount of sugar and milk in our cup of coffee, but only if we prepare our breakfast ourselves. Regardless of the objective nature of the situation, however, people vary in their assessments of perceived control over particular events and their lives in general. Some feel they can do almost anything they set their minds to; others feel that events result mostly from the actions of others or good and bad luck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, A. (1930). Individual psychology. In C. Murchinson (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 138–165 ). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrisani, P. J. (1978). Internal-external attitudes, personal initiative, and labor market experience. In P. J. Andrisani (Ed.), Work attitudes and labor market experience: Evidence from the national longitudinal surveys (pp. 101–134 ). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkkelin, D., Oakley, T., und Mynatt, C. (1979). Effects of controllable versus uncontrollable factors on responsibility attributions. A single-subject approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. L., und Kirsch, I. (1991). Cognitive mediators of pain perception and tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 504–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. (1972). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassi, V. A., Sweeney, P. D., und Dufour, C. L. (1988). Is there a relation between locus of con-trol orientation and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 357–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S., und Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug-choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biner, P. M., Angle, S. T., Park, J. H., Mellinger, A. E., und Barber, B. C. (1995). Need state and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 899–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. (1977). An information-processing approach to attribution of responsibility. Jour-nal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin C. R., und Shapiro, D. A. (1984). Beyond locus of control: Attribution of responsibility for positive and negative outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., Mc Ward, J., und LaTorre, D. (1989). Boundaries of self-control: Relinquishing control over aversive events. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolley, E. S., Gerard, H. B., und Kline, T. (1978). Competitive behavior: A manifestation of motivation for ability comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolinski, D. (1991) Perpetrator’s freedom of choice as a determinant of attribution of responsibility from the perspective of the victim and a neutral observer. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 22, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolinski, D., Gromski, W., und Szmajke, A. (1988). Perpetrator’s freedom of choice as a deter-minant of responsibility attribution. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., Davison, G. C., und Gatchel, R. I. (1970). Reduction of stress in humans through nonverdical perceived control of aversive stimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 731–738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D., und Singer, J. (1972). Urban stress. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromski, W., und Dolinski, D. (1987). Ascription of responsibility for others. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromski, W., und Nawrat, R. (1984). Some determinants of perceived responsibility and guilt in a compliance situation. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 15, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzelak, J., Wieczorkowska, G., Kuhlman, D., Joireman, J., Shelley, G., und Toshiaki, D. (1996). Control preferences in interpersonal and macro social settings. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Gmunden, Austria, July 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroto, D. S., und Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., und Berglas, S. (1978) Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., und Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1979). Controllability and human stress: Method, evidence and theory. Behavior Research and Therapy, 17, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1980). Why having control reduces stress: If I can stop the roller coaster, I don’t want to get off. In J. Garber und M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Human helplessness: Theory and applications (pp. 71–95 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R., und Krantz, D. (1979). Information, choice, and reactions to stress: A field experiment in a blood bank with laboratory analogue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 608–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., und Ross, C. E. (1983). Paranoia and the structure of powerlessness. American Sociological Review, 48, 228–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., und Ross, C. E. (1990). Control or defense? Depresssion and the sense of control over good and bad outcomes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 71–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmuter, L. C., und Monty, R. A. (1977). The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy? American Scientist, 65, 759–765.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmuter, L. C., Scharff, K., Karsh, R., und Monty, R. A. (1980). Perceived control. Ageneralized state of motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J. (1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., und Langer, E. (1977). Long-term effect of a control-relevant intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 897–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., Rennert, K., und Solomon, S. K. (1980). Intrinsic motivation for control: Fact or fiction. In A. Baum und J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology: Vol. 2 Applications of personal control (pp. 131–148 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., und House, P. (1997). The ‘false consensus effect’: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, P. R. (1982). Avoidance of diagnostic information in self-evaluation of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R. (1976). Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (1989). Reality negotiation: From excuses to hope and beyond. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 130–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., und Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: The effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., und Berry, J. M. (1985). Attributional and emotional concomitants of control relinquishment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., Berry, J. M., und Moergen, S. (1985). Relinquishment of control and the type A behavior pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 831–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., und Werner, C. (1984). Psychological reactance and the relinquishment of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., und Werner, C. (1985). Relinquishment of control and the type Abehavior pattern: The role of performance evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 688–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., Sobolew-Shubin, A., Galbraith, M. E., Schwankovsky, L., und Cruzen, D. (1993). Maintaining perception of control: Finding perceived control in low-control circumstances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. T. P. (1992). Control is a double-edged sword. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24, 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B. (1975). Some determinants of perceived control Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31282–294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Opole, Oleska 48, 45-951, Opole, Poland

    Dariusz Dolinski

Authors
  1. Dariusz Dolinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183, Warsaw, Poland

    Miroslaw Kofta  & Grzegorz Sedek  & 

  2. Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Gifford Weary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dolinski, D. (1998). To Control or Not to Control. In: Kofta, M., Weary, G., Sedek, G. (eds) Personal Control in Action. The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2901-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2901-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3285-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2901-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation