Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reintroduction of Rare Plants: Genetics, Demography, and the Role of Ex Situ Conservation Methods

  • Chapter
Conservation Biology

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

Many endangered plant species have been reduced to so few populations and such low numbers that timely collection and storage of seed has become imperative. If donor populations become extinct or seriously depleted, then off-site, or ex situ, samples can be used to reintroduce or augment populations in the wild. The strategic value of an ex situ component for plant conservation has been articulated by Falk (1987, 1990, 1992), who also helped establish the Center for Plant Conservation (CPC). The CPC is a national network of botanic gardens and arboreta that is attempting to assemble a genetically representative collection of our nation’s most rare and endangered plants while it is still possible to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Barrett, S.C.H. and J.R. Kohn. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 3–30. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, C.R. 1991. Guidance notes for translocating plants as part of recovery plans. Nature Conservancy Council, CSD Report 1225. Peterborough, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, M. and J. McBride. 1996. Pitcher’s thistle (Circium pitcheri) reintroduction. In Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D. Falk, C. Millar, and M. Olwell, 423–431. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, M., R. Flakne, K. McEachern, and N. Pavlovic. 1993. Status and restoration planning for the federally threatened pitcher’s thistle (Circium pitcheri) in Illinois. Natural Areas Journal 13:164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, M. and C. Whelan, eds. 1994. Recovery and restoration of endangered species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M.E. 1981. Monitoring grassland plants in Upper Teesdale, England. In The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, ed. H. Synge, 241–251. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, S. 1988. Malheur wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis) biology and interactions with cheatgrass: 1987 study results and recommendations for a recovery plan. Unpublished report to Burns District, OR, Bureau of Land Management. Submitted 20 June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.H.D. and J.D. Briggs. 1991. Sampling strategies for genetic variation in ex situ collections of endangered plant species. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 99–119. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Plant Conservation. 1991. Appendix. Genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of endangered plants. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 225–238. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CH2M Hill. 1986. Studies of Sidalcea nelsoniana. Unpublished progress report, City of McMinnville Water and Light Department, McMinnville, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • CH2M Hill. 1995. Technical Memorandum: Sidalcea nelsoniana monitoring

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.E., D. Tilman, J. Estes, B.A. Menge, W.J. Bond, L.S. Mills, G. Daily, J.C. Castilla, J. Lubchenco and R.T. Paine. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystone. Bioscience 46:609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F. and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, A.J. and R.L. Jefferies. 1981. Approaches to the monitoring of rare plant populations. In The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, ed. H. Synge, 219–232. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMauro, M.M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMauro, M.M. 1994. Development and implementation of a recovery program for the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). In Recovery and restoration of endangered species, eds. M. Bowles and C. Whelan, 298–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, D.W. 1970. Biological conservation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A. 1987. Integrated conservation strategies for endangered plants. Natural Areas Journal 7:118–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A. 1990. Integrated strategies for conserving plant genetic diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A. 1992. From conservation biology to conservation practice: Strategies for protecting plant diversity. In Conservation Biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management, eds. P.L. Fiedler and S.K. Jain, 397–431. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A. and K.E. Holsinger, eds. 1991. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A., C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, eds. 1996. Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, P.L. 1987. Life history and population dynamics of rare and common mariposa lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology 75:977–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, P.L., P.S. White, and R. A. Leidy. 1996. The paradigm shift in ecology and its implications for conservation. In Enhancing the ecological basis of conservation: Heterogenity, ecosystem function, and biodiversity, eds. S.T.A. Pickett, R.S. Ostfeld, H. Schchak, and G.E. Likens, 145–160. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O.H. and E. Bennett, eds. 1970. Genetic resources in plants: Their exploration and conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, R. 1995. Inbreeding and extinction: A threshold effect. Conservation Biology 9:792–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. 1987. Spatial structure and population vulnerability. In Viable populations for conservation, ed. M.E. SoulĂ©, 125–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. and M.E. SoulĂ©. 1986. Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. In Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity, ed. M.E. SoulĂ©, 19–34. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glad, J.B., R.R. Halse, and R. Mishaga. 1994. Observations on distribution, abundance, and habitats of Sidalcea nelsoniana Piper (Malvaceae) in Oregon. Phytologia 76:307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.R. 1996. Apalachicola rosemary (Conradina glabra) reintroduction. In Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 417–422. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1973. Genetic differentiation, sympatric speciation and the origin of a diploid species of Stephanomeria. American Journal of Botany. 60:545–553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1977. Phenotypic variation in Stephanomeria exigua ssp. coronaria (Compositae) and its recent derivative species “malheurensis.” American Journal of Botany 64:873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1978. Allocation, growth rates and gas exchange in seedlings of Stephanomeria exigua ssp. coronaria and its recent derivative S. malheurensis. American Journal of Botany 65:970–977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1979. The origin of phenotype in a recently evolved species. In Topics in plant population biology, eds. O.T Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson, and P.H. Raven, 264–286. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1983. Interference between individuals in pure and mixed cultures of Stephanomeria malheurensis and its progenitor. American Journal of Botany 70:276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L.D. 1991. The Malheur wire-lettuce: a rare, recently evolved Oregon species. Kalmiopsis (Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon) 1:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant Jr., E.O. 1996a. Designing populations for reintroduction: Demographic opportunities, horticultural options, and the maintenance of genetic diversity. In Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 171–207. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant Jr., E.O. 1996b. Experimental reintroduction of Stephanomeria malheurensis. In Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 399–402. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant Jr., E.O., S.T. Schultz, and D. Imper. 1996. Draft recovery plan for Lilium occidentale, the western lily. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland field office, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, S.M., J.D. Ballou, and S.R. Derrickson. 1990. Management options for preserving genetic diversity: Reintroduction of Guam rails to the wild. Conservation Biology 4:290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse, R.R., B.A. Rottink, and R. Mishaga. 1989. Studies in Sidalcea taxonomy. Northwest Science 63:154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M.B. 1994. Ex-situ conservation of wild plant species: Time to reassess the genetic assumptions and implications of seed banks. Conservation Biology 8:39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L. 1989. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In Isozymes in plant biology, eds. D.E. Soltis and P.S. Soltis, 87–105. Portland: Dioscorides Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L. and M.J.W. Godt. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, eds. A.D.H. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler, and B.S. Weir, 43–63. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L., M.J.W. Godt, D.A. Murawski, and M.D. Loveless. 1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: Implications for conservation biology. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E Holsinger, 75–86. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. 1977. The population biology of plants. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K.E. and L.D. Gottlieb. 1991. Conservation of rare and endangered plants: Principles and prospects. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 195–208. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9:782–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledig, F.T. 1996. Pinus torreyana at the Torrey Pine State Reserve, California. In Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 265–271. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesica, P. and F.W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology 9:753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loebel, D.A., R.K. Nurthen, R. Frankham, D.A. Briscoe, and D. Craven. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Consequences of equalizing founder representation. Zoo Biology 11:319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Burger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146:489–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. and C. Tier. 1994. Four facts every conservation biologist should know about persistence. Ecology 75:607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K.A. 1995. Stephanomeria malheurensis Progress Report1993–1994. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Burns District Office, Hines Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E.L. 1992. Patterns of genetic diversity in the rare mint Conradina glabra and its nearest relative Conradina canescens. M.S. thesis, University of West Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder, M. 1992. Plant reintroduction: An overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 1:21–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, T.R., J. Antonovics, and R. Primack. 1978. Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. III. Genetic variation and demography in relation to survival of Plantago cordata, a rare species. Biological Conservation 14:243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E.S. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant. Conservation Biology 4:52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E.S. 1991a. Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conservation Biology 5:158–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E.S. 1991b. The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 45–61. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E.S. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management, eds. P.L. Fiedler and S.K. Jain, 253–275. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrhoff, L.A. 1996. The reintroduction of endangered Hawaiian plants. In Restoring diversity: Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 101–120. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R. 1976. The reproductive system of Amsinckia grandiflora, a distylous species. Systematic Botany 1:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantone, D.J., B.M. Pavlik, and R.B. Kelley. 1995. The reproductive attributes of an endangered plant as compared to a weedy congener. Biological Conservation 71:305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, R.L. and E.O. Guerrant Jr. 1990. Down but not out: Reintroduction of the extirpated Malheur wirelettuce, Stephanomeria malheurensis. Endangered Species Update 8:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B.M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plants. In Recovery and restoration of endangered species, eds. M. Bowles and C. Whelan, 322–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B.M. 1995. The recovery of an endangered plant. II. A three-phased approach to restoring populations. In Restoration ecology in Europe, eds. K.M. Urbanska and K. Grodzinska, 49–69. Zurich: Geobotanical Institute SFIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B.M. 1996. Defining and measuring success in rare plant reintroductions. In Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 127–155. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B.M., D. Nickrent, and A.M. Howald. 1993. The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conservation Biology 7:510–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., V.T. Parker, and P.L. Fiedler. 1992. The new paradigm in ecology: Implications for conservation biology above the species level. In Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management, eds. P.L. Fiedler and S.K. Jain, 65–88. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. In The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, ed. H. Synge, 205–217. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D., J.K. Rapp, S. Cairns, and M. Mayer. 1989. The persistence of rare prairie grasses in Missouri: Environmental variation buffered by reproductive output of sparse species. American Naturalist 134:525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W., B.C. Husband, M.H. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillie, I.M. Parker, and J.G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, D.J. and S.C. Stewart. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40:1109–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M.L. 1981. Minimum population size for species conservation. BioScience 3:131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SoulĂ©, M.E. and B.A. Wilcox. 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, R.D. 1996. Monitoring. In Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants, eds. D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar, and P. Olwell, 235–264. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R. 1990. The role of genetics in captive breeding and reintroduction for species conservation. Endangered Species Update 8:14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R. 1991. Off-site breeding of animals and implications for plant conservation strategies. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, eds. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, 182–194. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkyn, D.W. 1993. Optimization techniques for the genetic management of endangered species. Endangered Species Update 10:1–4(+9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S.R. 1990. Central Florida Scrub: Trying to save the pieces. Endangered Species Update 8:59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. 1992. Introduction of Conradina glabra: a pilot project for the conservation of an endangered Florida endemic. Botanic Garden Conservation News 1:34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, P.D. and J.R. Massey. 1981. Information systems for use in studying population status of threatened and endangered plants. In The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, ed. H. Synge, 217–236. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, G.D. 1995. Guidelines for the management of orthodox seeds. St. Louis: Center for Plant Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D.S., M. McMillan, and K.C. Winston. 1993. What exactly is an endangered species? An analysis of the U.S. endangered species list: 1985–1991. Conservation Biology 7:87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Edward O. Guerrant Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce M. Pavlik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 94132, San Francisco, California, USA

    Peggy L. Fiedler

  2. Department of Zoology, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Peter M. Kareiva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerrant, E.O., Pavlik, B.M. (1998). Reintroduction of Rare Plants: Genetics, Demography, and the Role of Ex Situ Conservation Methods. In: Fiedler, P.L., Kareiva, P.M. (eds) Conservation Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2880-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2880-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2882-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2880-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation