Conceptual Design and Analysis of Rail Car Unloading Area

  • Jonathan F. Bard
Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 16)

Abstract

Faced with growing demand at their Alexandria, Louisiana laundry detergent plant, Procter & Gamble asked a design team from the University of Texas to undertake a study of the raw materials unloading area. This chapter reports on the results of that effort and presents the accompanying mathematical model developed to help analyze the material flows. In the first part of the study the design team established daily requirements for the number of raw material rail cars unloaded per day. The related combinatorial optimization problem of assigning rail cars to positions on the platform and unloading equipment to rail cars, was modeled as a mixed integer nonlinear program. The inability of two standard commercial codes to find optimal solutions led to the development of a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP). Accounting for the operational and physical limitations of the system, the GRASP was used to determine the maximum performance that could be achieved under normal conditions. The second part of the study called for the conceptualization of alternative designs for meeting an expected 14% increase in demand over the next few years. The analytic hierarchy process in conjunction with a standard scoring model was used to rank the evaluation criteria and to select the most preferred alternative. A worst case analysis of the top candidate confirmed its performance capabilities.

Keywords

Product Line Analytic Hierarchy Process Design Alternative Design Team Greedy Randomize Adaptive Search Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. Coates, M. Hutchinson, B. Y. Ko, and S. Melito, 1995, Conceptual design and a mathematical model of a raw materials unloading area, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. A. Feo and J. F. Bard, 1989, Flight scheduling and maintenance base planning, Management Science, 35, 1415–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. A. Feo, J. F. Bard and S. D. Holland, 1995, Facility wide scheduling of printed wiring board assembly, Operations Research, 43, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. A. Feo and M. G. C. Resende, 1995, Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures, Journal of Global Optimization, 6, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. L. Golden, W. A. Wasil and P. T. Harker (eds.), 1989, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Kontoravdis and J. F. Bard, 1995, A GRASP for the vehicle routing problem with time windows, ORSA Journal on Computing, 7, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Kraus, 1980, Pneumatic conveying of bulk materials, second edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. E. Meyers, 1993, Plant layout and material handling, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan F. Bard
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Operations Research Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations