Skip to main content

Partnerships and Networks as Self-Organizing Systems: an Antidote to Principal-Agent Theory

  • Chapter
Inter and Intra Government Arrangements for Productivity

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of self-organization, by means of which groups of agents accommodate each other, acquire collective properties which they could not individually possess, and achieve outcomes which they value, without anyone being in charge or consciously planning it. This concept, developed in the natural sciences, appears to fly in the face of ‘the incessant forces of dissolution described by the second law of thermodynamics’ (Waldrop, 1994: 102). It also offers the prospect of an alternative viewpoint on how action can be mobilized to that offered by principal-agent theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. “The economics of agency”. In Principals and Agents: the Structure of Business, Pratt, J.W. and Zeckhauser, R.J., eds. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Co-operation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. Managing urban economic development: learning to change or the marketing of failure? Urban Studies 1994;31(4/5):573–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., Green, J., M. Steve, Millward, A., Tricker, M. Evaluation of Rural Action: Three Year Assessment of Cost-Effectiveness. Birmingham: Aston Business School, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.C. and Porras, J.I. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: Harper Business, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. and Nalebuff, B.J. Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life. New York: W.W. Norton, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J., Power, J. M. and Yewlett, CJ. L. Public Planning: the Inter-corporate Dimension. London: Tavistock, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Cassares, B. Group versus group: how alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review July- August, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. Naivete and maturity, inertia and fatigue: are working relationships between public organisations doomed to fail? Paper presented at The Contract State: the Future of Public Management, Employment Research Unit Conference, University of Cardiff, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. “Governance and governability: using complexity, dynamics and diversity”. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Kooiman, J., ed. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. and Probst G.J.B. Joint ventures as self-organising systems: a key to successful joint venture design and implementation. Columbia Journal of World Business 1987;22–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M.W. and Zucker, L.G. Permanently Failing Organisations. Newbury Park: Sage, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame: How Companies Succeed or Fail. New York: Free Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. and Stacey, R. Chaos, Management and Economics: the Implications of Non-linear Thinking. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. “Small-firm networks”. In Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form and Action, Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.G, eds. Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and Sabel, C. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R.D. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics. London: Pitman, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. Whither Socialism? London: MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. Complexity: the Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Penguin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.C. “Agency as control in formal networks”. In Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form and Action, Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.G., eds. Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bovaird, T., Sharifi, S. (1998). Partnerships and Networks as Self-Organizing Systems: an Antidote to Principal-Agent Theory. In: Halachmi, A., Boorsma, P.B. (eds) Inter and Intra Government Arrangements for Productivity. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2864-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2864-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5015-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2864-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics