Consultancy in Government: Conditions for Success of a ‘Change Agent’

  • Sirpa Kekkonen
  • Hilkka Summa


The use of management consultants in the public sector is a phenomenon which has grown in scope and influence over the past few years. An increasing number of governments have created in-government consultancy (see also Grant, this volume) units to support their public management reform policies. This chapter discusses the role of internal consultancy in the implementation of public sector reforms, pointing out the advantages and potential problems in trusting this kind of support for change. Mainly on the basis of Finnish experience, we will assess what kind of support for change is most effectively provided by in-government consultancy units, and discuss the strategies that can be used in the financing, organizing and ways of working of these units. A problem we want to address is that, while a client-based way of working is important if the consultancy units are to be accepted and trusted by managers in the organizations using their services, consultancy focusing on the needs of single agencies may also become a disintegrating force as it tends to emphasize the autonomy and distinct needs of individual organizations. A challenge to be met when developing strategies for internal consultancy is how it also could be a support for integration and coordination of government-wide renewal.


Public Sector Reform Policy Public Management Public Organization Public Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Balk, W.L., Bouckaert, G., Bronner, K.M. Notes on the Theory and Practice of Government Productivity Improvement. Public Productivity & Management Review 1989;Vol.XIII, No. 2.Google Scholar
  2. Czarniawska-Joerges, Ba. Att handla med ord [To do business with words; in Swedish], Stockholm: Carlssons, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Efficiency Unit. The Government’s Use of External Management Consultants: An Efficiency Unit Scrutiny. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Gabris, G.T. Recognizing Management Technique Dysfunctions: How Management Tools Often Create More Problems Than They Solve. Public Productivity Review, 1986;Vol. X, No. 2.Google Scholar
  5. Hoover, D.F. “Internal Consulting.” In Public Productivity Handbook, M. Holzer, ed. N.Y.: Marcel Dekker, inc, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Metcalf, L., Sue, R. Public Management: From Imitation to Innovation. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Workshop on “Governance”, University of Essex, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. OECD. Internal Management Consultancy in Government. Public Management Occasional Papers, GD(92)185, Paris: OECD, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. OECD. Governance in Transition. Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. Siegel, G.B, Clayton, R., Kovoor, S. Modelling Interorganizational Effectiveness. Public Productivity & Management Review 1990;Vol. XIII, No. 3.Google Scholar
  11. Skinner, Q., ed. Introduction to Machiavelli, The Prince. Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Zussman, D., Jabes, J. Vertical Solitude. Managing the Public Sector. Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sirpa Kekkonen
  • Hilkka Summa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations