Advertisement

Memory-Based Advertising Effectiveness Techniques: Recall versus Recognition

  • Asunción Beerli Palacio
  • Josefa D. Martín Santana
Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 19)

Abstract

The aim of this research paper is to carry out a review of memory-based advertising effectiveness techniques by making a comparative analysis of the different types of measurements, their usefulness and the advantages and disadvantages of each. We will also attempt to demonstrate that recognition, despite the criticism it receives, is a valid technique for measuring advertising effectiveness in terms of memory. It is so, as long as a forced choice test or a batch-testing procedure is used, together with a scale indicating degree of confidence with which the subjects recognize an item.

Keywords

Advertising effectiveness Recall Recognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, D.A., Batra, R. and Myers, J.G. (1992), Advertising management, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, A., Mehrotra, S. and Auken, S.V. (1983), “Reliability of forced-exposure television copytesting”, Journal of Advertising Research 23/3, June-July, 29–32.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R. and Bower, G.H. (1974), “A prepositional theory of recognition memory”, Memory & Cognition 2/3,406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appel, V. and Blum, M.L. (1961), “Ad recognition and respondent set”, Journal of Advertising Research 1, 13–21.Google Scholar
  5. Berkman, H.W. and Gilson, C. (1987), Advertising, Random House, Inc. 2nd ed. United States.Google Scholar
  6. Bettman, J.R. (1979), “Memory factors in consumer choice: A review”, Journal ofMarketing 43/2, Spring, 37–53.Google Scholar
  7. Bozinoff, L., Canada, B. and Roth, V.J. (1983), “Recall and recognition memory for product attributes and benefits”, Advances in Consumer Research XI, 348–352.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G. (1985), “Tracking studies and sales effects: A U.K. perspective”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/1, February-March, 52–64.Google Scholar
  9. Chook, P.H. (1985), “A continuing study of magazine environment, frequency, and advertising performance”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/4, August-September, 23–33.Google Scholar
  10. Clancy, K.J., Ostlund, L.E. and Wyner, G.A (1979), “False reporting of magazine readership”, Journal of Advertising Research 19/5, October, 23–30.Google Scholar
  11. Dubow, J.S. (1994), “Point of view: Recall revisited: Recall redux”, Journal of Advertising Research 34/3, May-June, 92–106.Google Scholar
  12. Emmerich, S. (1982), “Major study details ads’ effect on sales”, Advertising Age 21, June, 1–82.Google Scholar
  13. Frankenberger, K.D. (1990), An investigation of memory and attitudes for advertising at different levels of processing, UMI Dissertation Information Services, Michigan.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, L.D. (1983), “If the question is copy testing. The answer is not recall”, Journal of Advertising Research 23/1, February-March, 39–46.Google Scholar
  15. Haley, R.I., Richardson, J. and Baldwin, B.M. (1984), “The efifects of nonverbal communications in television advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 24/4, August-September, 11–18.Google Scholar
  16. Higie, R.A. and Sewall, M.A. (1991), “Using recall and brand preference to evaluate advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Advertising Research 31/2, April-May, 56–63.Google Scholar
  17. Klatzky, R.L. (1980), Human memory: Structures and processes, W.H. Freeman and Company, 2nd ed., New York.Google Scholar
  18. Krugman, H.E. (1977, 1982), “Memory without recall, exposure without perception”, Journal of Advertising Research 17/4, August, 7–12/ Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. I, September, 80–85.Google Scholar
  19. Krugman, H.E. (1985), “Point of view: Measuring memory. An industry dilemma”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/’4, August-September, 49–51.Google Scholar
  20. Krugman, H.E. (1986), “Low recall and high recognition of advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 26/1, February-March, 79–86.Google Scholar
  21. Lavidge, R.J. and Steiner, G.A. (1961), “A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Marketing 25, October, 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leigh, J.H. (1984), “Recall and recognition performance for umbrella print advertisements”, Journal of Advertising 13/4,5–18.Google Scholar
  23. Lucas, D.B. and Britt, S.H. (1963), Measuring advertising effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martinez Ramos, E. (1992), El uso de los medios de comunicació’;n en marketing y publicidad, Ediciones Akal. Madrid. Neu, D.M. (1961), “Measuring advertisement recognition”, Journal of Advertising Research 1/6,17–22.Google Scholar
  25. Nylen, D.W. (1986), Advertising. Planning, implementation & control, South-Western, 3rd ed., Ohio.Google Scholar
  26. Ortega Martinez, E. (1987), La dirección publicitaria, Esic Editorial, Madrid.Google Scholar
  27. Perry, M. and Perry, A. (1976), “Ad recall: Biased measure of media?”, Journal of Advertising Research 16/3, June, 21–25.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, H.L., Jr. (1982, 1984), “Recall versus persuasion: An answer”, Journal of Advertising Research 22/1, February-March, 13–16/Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. II, September, 55–58.Google Scholar
  29. Rossiter, J.R. (1976), “Visual and verbal memory in children’s product information utilization”, Advances in Consumer Research 3, 523–527.Google Scholar
  30. Rossiter, J.R. (1981), “Predicting starch scores”, Journal of Advertising Research 21/5, October, 63–68.Google Scholar
  31. Rossiter J.R. and Percy, L. (1987), Advertising & promotion management, McGraw-Hill, Inc., United States.Google Scholar
  32. Singh, S.N. (1982), Recognition as a measure of learning from television commercials, UMI Dissertation Information Services, Michigan.Google Scholar
  33. Singh, S.N. and Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1987), “Response-bias-free recognition tests to measure advertising effects”, Journal of Advertising Research 27/3, June-July, 23–36.Google Scholar
  34. Singh, S.N. and Cole, C.A. (1985), “Forced-choice recognition tests: A critical review”, Journal of Advertising 14/3, 52–58.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, S.N. and Rothschild, M.L. (1983), “Recognition as a measure of learning from television commercials”, Journal of Marketing Research XXV, August, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh, S.N., Rothschild, M.L. and Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1988), “Recognition and recall as measures of television commercial forgetting”, Journal of Marketing Research XV, February, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, E.W. and Mason, J.B. (1970), “The influence of instructions on respondent error”, Journal of Marketing Research 112,254–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stapel, J. (1987), “Viva recall! Viva persuasion!”, European Research 15/4, November, 222–225.Google Scholar
  39. Stewart, D.W. (1986), “The moderating role of recall, comprehension, and brand differentiation on the persuasiveness of television advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 26/6, April-May, 43–47.Google Scholar
  40. Sutherland, M. (1993), Advertising and the mind of the consumer. What works, what doesn ’t and why, Allen & Unwin, Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Valli, C. (1986), “La medición del efecto de la publicidad”, in: Valentini, G. (ed.), Publicidad, Enciclopedia de Marketing, URMO, Bilbao, 366–456.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, W., Burnett, J. and Moriarty, S. (1992), Advertising. Principles and practice, Prentice Hall Inc., 2nd ed, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  43. Young, S. (1982), “Copy testing without magic numbers”, Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. 1, September, 39–50.Google Scholar
  44. Zinkhan, G.M., Locander, W.B. and Leigh, J.H. (1986), “Dimensional relationships of aided recall and recognition”, Journal of Advertising 15/1,38–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asunción Beerli Palacio
    • 1
  • Josefa D. Martín Santana
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business Administration and ManagementUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain

Personalised recommendations