Skip to main content

Memory-Based Advertising Effectiveness Techniques: Recall versus Recognition

  • Chapter
Managing in Uncertainty: Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 19))

Abstract

The aim of this research paper is to carry out a review of memory-based advertising effectiveness techniques by making a comparative analysis of the different types of measurements, their usefulness and the advantages and disadvantages of each. We will also attempt to demonstrate that recognition, despite the criticism it receives, is a valid technique for measuring advertising effectiveness in terms of memory. It is so, as long as a forced choice test or a batch-testing procedure is used, together with a scale indicating degree of confidence with which the subjects recognize an item.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaker, D.A., Batra, R. and Myers, J.G. (1992), Advertising management, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, A., Mehrotra, S. and Auken, S.V. (1983), “Reliability of forced-exposure television copytesting”, Journal of Advertising Research 23/3, June-July, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. and Bower, G.H. (1974), “A prepositional theory of recognition memory”, Memory & Cognition 2/3,406–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel, V. and Blum, M.L. (1961), “Ad recognition and respondent set”, Journal of Advertising Research 1, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H.W. and Gilson, C. (1987), Advertising, Random House, Inc. 2nd ed. United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J.R. (1979), “Memory factors in consumer choice: A review”, Journal ofMarketing 43/2, Spring, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozinoff, L., Canada, B. and Roth, V.J. (1983), “Recall and recognition memory for product attributes and benefits”, Advances in Consumer Research XI, 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (1985), “Tracking studies and sales effects: A U.K. perspective”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/1, February-March, 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chook, P.H. (1985), “A continuing study of magazine environment, frequency, and advertising performance”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/4, August-September, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, K.J., Ostlund, L.E. and Wyner, G.A (1979), “False reporting of magazine readership”, Journal of Advertising Research 19/5, October, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubow, J.S. (1994), “Point of view: Recall revisited: Recall redux”, Journal of Advertising Research 34/3, May-June, 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, S. (1982), “Major study details ads’ effect on sales”, Advertising Age 21, June, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger, K.D. (1990), An investigation of memory and attitudes for advertising at different levels of processing, UMI Dissertation Information Services, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L.D. (1983), “If the question is copy testing. The answer is not recall”, Journal of Advertising Research 23/1, February-March, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, R.I., Richardson, J. and Baldwin, B.M. (1984), “The efifects of nonverbal communications in television advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 24/4, August-September, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higie, R.A. and Sewall, M.A. (1991), “Using recall and brand preference to evaluate advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Advertising Research 31/2, April-May, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R.L. (1980), Human memory: Structures and processes, W.H. Freeman and Company, 2nd ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1977, 1982), “Memory without recall, exposure without perception”, Journal of Advertising Research 17/4, August, 7–12/ Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. I, September, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1985), “Point of view: Measuring memory. An industry dilemma”, Journal of Advertising Research 25/’4, August-September, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1986), “Low recall and high recognition of advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 26/1, February-March, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, R.J. and Steiner, G.A. (1961), “A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Marketing 25, October, 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, J.H. (1984), “Recall and recognition performance for umbrella print advertisements”, Journal of Advertising 13/4,5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, D.B. and Britt, S.H. (1963), Measuring advertising effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Ramos, E. (1992), El uso de los medios de comunicació’;n en marketing y publicidad, Ediciones Akal. Madrid. Neu, D.M. (1961), “Measuring advertisement recognition”, Journal of Advertising Research 1/6,17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylen, D.W. (1986), Advertising. Planning, implementation & control, South-Western, 3rd ed., Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega Martinez, E. (1987), La dirección publicitaria, Esic Editorial, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. and Perry, A. (1976), “Ad recall: Biased measure of media?”, Journal of Advertising Research 16/3, June, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H.L., Jr. (1982, 1984), “Recall versus persuasion: An answer”, Journal of Advertising Research 22/1, February-March, 13–16/Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. II, September, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J.R. (1976), “Visual and verbal memory in children’s product information utilization”, Advances in Consumer Research 3, 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J.R. (1981), “Predicting starch scores”, Journal of Advertising Research 21/5, October, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter J.R. and Percy, L. (1987), Advertising & promotion management, McGraw-Hill, Inc., United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N. (1982), Recognition as a measure of learning from television commercials, UMI Dissertation Information Services, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N. and Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1987), “Response-bias-free recognition tests to measure advertising effects”, Journal of Advertising Research 27/3, June-July, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N. and Cole, C.A. (1985), “Forced-choice recognition tests: A critical review”, Journal of Advertising 14/3, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N. and Rothschild, M.L. (1983), “Recognition as a measure of learning from television commercials”, Journal of Marketing Research XXV, August, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.N., Rothschild, M.L. and Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1988), “Recognition and recall as measures of television commercial forgetting”, Journal of Marketing Research XV, February, 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.W. and Mason, J.B. (1970), “The influence of instructions on respondent error”, Journal of Marketing Research 112,254–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, J. (1987), “Viva recall! Viva persuasion!”, European Research 15/4, November, 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D.W. (1986), “The moderating role of recall, comprehension, and brand differentiation on the persuasiveness of television advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research 26/6, April-May, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. (1993), Advertising and the mind of the consumer. What works, what doesn ’t and why, Allen & Unwin, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli, C. (1986), “La medición del efecto de la publicidad”, in: Valentini, G. (ed.), Publicidad, Enciclopedia de Marketing, URMO, Bilbao, 366–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W., Burnett, J. and Moriarty, S. (1992), Advertising. Principles and practice, Prentice Hall Inc., 2nd ed, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (1982), “Copy testing without magic numbers”, Journal of Advertising Research, Classics, Vol. 1, September, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, G.M., Locander, W.B. and Leigh, J.H. (1986), “Dimensional relationships of aided recall and recognition”, Journal of Advertising 15/1,38–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palacio, A.B., Santana, J.D.M. (1998). Memory-Based Advertising Effectiveness Techniques: Recall versus Recognition. In: Zopounidis, C., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Managing in Uncertainty: Theory and Practice. Applied Optimization, vol 19. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2845-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2845-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4801-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2845-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics