Abstract
When in May 1998 Ethiopia and Eritrea waged war against each other, it was a clear-cut situation: in a regional context a traditionally large, if not imperialist, power was fighting against a newly independent small state. Another example is anything but clear in terms of large vs. small: take a rather small European state, such as Belgium, which has a GNP comparable to that of all countries of large sub-Saharan Africa together (except the Republic of South Africa). In the case of Eritrea and Ethiopia, the classical „security dilemma“ between sovereign neighbor states which compare their military strength (yet in a crude way) is still working. In the latter case, historical, structural, and socioeconomic issues form the basis for comparing countries that are in a way not comparable at all. The question therefore arises: how to compare small and large countries to get a meaningful country weighting — worldwide and in the European context we are focusing on in this book?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Martin Schwind (1972): Allgemeine Staatengeographie. Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Geographie (Bd. VIII), Berlin/New York (De Gruyter), p. 349.
Schwind (1972), pp. 350–351 (see note no. 1).
See for example United Nations Development Program (ed.) (1996): Human Development (report), New York.
Robert O. Keohane (Spring 1969:2): Lilliputians’ Dilemmas. Small States in International Politics, in: International Organization (vol. XXIII), pp. 291 – 311.
Hans Geser Die „neue Weltordnung“ im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kleinstaatlichkeit und internationalen Organisationen, in: Alois Riklin, Luzius Wildhaber and Herbert Wille (eds.) (1993): Kleinstaat und Menschenrechte (Festgabe für Gerhard Batliner zum 65. Geburtstag), Basle/Frankfurt a.M. (Helbing & Lichtenhahn), pp. 201 – 226.
Kalevi J. Holsti (1988): International Politics. A Framework for Analysis, Englewood Cliffs N.J. (Prentice-Hall), p. 79.
See Keohane (1969:2), p. 295 (see note no. 4).
Keohane (1969:2), p. 310 (see note no. 4).
See Goetschel in this volume, p. 19.
See Goetschel in this volume, p. 19.
See Thürer in this volume, p. 36.
See Thürer in this volume, p. 33.
Geser (1993), p. 203 (see note no. 5).
See Goetschel in this volume, p. 31.
Already Rothstein has constructed a psychological-material definition of the weight of a state in the international system taking into account the national „state of mind“. See Robert L. Rothstein (1968): Alliances and Small Powers, New York (Columbia University Press), p. 29. Conservative movements such as the „Action for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland“ (AUNS) mainly borrow their vocabulary and their strengths from the very role the identity function in modern states play.
See Hänggi in this volume.
The Economist (1 February 1997): Weighty Matters for Europe’s Ur
The Economist (1 February 1997) (see note no. 17).
See Kuosmanen in this volume, p. 77.
See Egger in this volume, pp. 103ff.
See Egger in this volume.
See Ettore Greco: Nature and Classification of New Security Challenges in Europe, in: Gianni Bonvicini, Maurizio Cremasco, Reinhard Rummel and Peter Schmidt (eds.) (1995/96): A Renewed Partnership for Europe. Tackling European Security Challenges by EU-NATO Interaction, Baden-Baden (Nomos), pp. 15–38.
See Balslev in this volume, p. 122.
See Agrell in this volume, p. 182.
See Agrell in this volume, p. 191.
See Tiilikainen in this volume, p. 178.
See for further discussion Günther Baechler (ed.) (1994): Beitreten oder Trittbrett-fahren? Die Zukunft der Neutralität in Europa, Chur/Zurich (Rüegger).
See Norkus in this volume, p. 158.
See Brown in this volume, p. 243.
See Brown in this volume, p. 244.
See Brown in this volume, p. 245.
See Geurts and Zbinden in this volume.
See Baillie in this volume as well as Baillie (February 1997): A Theory of Small State Influence in the EU (Paper prepared for the 25th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops), Berne.
Baillie (1997), p. 3 (see note no. 33).
Baillie (1992), p. 16 (see note no. 33).
See von Däniken in this volume, p. 47f.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baechler, G. (1998). Conclusions: Future Relevance and Priorities of Small States. In: Goetschel, L. (eds) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5060-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2832-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive