Skip to main content

Conclusions: Future Relevance and Priorities of Small States

  • Chapter
Small States Inside and Outside the European Union

Abstract

When in May 1998 Ethiopia and Eritrea waged war against each other, it was a clear-cut situation: in a regional context a traditionally large, if not imperialist, power was fighting against a newly independent small state. Another example is anything but clear in terms of large vs. small: take a rather small European state, such as Belgium, which has a GNP comparable to that of all countries of large sub-Saharan Africa together (except the Republic of South Africa). In the case of Eritrea and Ethiopia, the classical „security dilemma“ between sovereign neighbor states which compare their military strength (yet in a crude way) is still working. In the latter case, historical, structural, and socioeconomic issues form the basis for comparing countries that are in a way not comparable at all. The question therefore arises: how to compare small and large countries to get a meaningful country weighting — worldwide and in the European context we are focusing on in this book?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Martin Schwind (1972): Allgemeine Staatengeographie. Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Geographie (Bd. VIII), Berlin/New York (De Gruyter), p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwind (1972), pp. 350–351 (see note no. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See for example United Nations Development Program (ed.) (1996): Human Development (report), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert O. Keohane (Spring 1969:2): Lilliputians’ Dilemmas. Small States in International Politics, in: International Organization (vol. XXIII), pp. 291 – 311.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hans Geser Die „neue Weltordnung“ im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kleinstaatlichkeit und internationalen Organisationen, in: Alois Riklin, Luzius Wildhaber and Herbert Wille (eds.) (1993): Kleinstaat und Menschenrechte (Festgabe für Gerhard Batliner zum 65. Geburtstag), Basle/Frankfurt a.M. (Helbing & Lichtenhahn), pp. 201 – 226.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalevi J. Holsti (1988): International Politics. A Framework for Analysis, Englewood Cliffs N.J. (Prentice-Hall), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Keohane (1969:2), p. 295 (see note no. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keohane (1969:2), p. 310 (see note no. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Goetschel in this volume, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Goetschel in this volume, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Thürer in this volume, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Thürer in this volume, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geser (1993), p. 203 (see note no. 5).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Goetschel in this volume, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Already Rothstein has constructed a psychological-material definition of the weight of a state in the international system taking into account the national „state of mind“. See Robert L. Rothstein (1968): Alliances and Small Powers, New York (Columbia University Press), p. 29. Conservative movements such as the „Action for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland“ (AUNS) mainly borrow their vocabulary and their strengths from the very role the identity function in modern states play.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Hänggi in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Economist (1 February 1997): Weighty Matters for Europe’s Ur

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Economist (1 February 1997) (see note no. 17).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Kuosmanen in this volume, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Egger in this volume, pp. 103ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Egger in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Ettore Greco: Nature and Classification of New Security Challenges in Europe, in: Gianni Bonvicini, Maurizio Cremasco, Reinhard Rummel and Peter Schmidt (eds.) (1995/96): A Renewed Partnership for Europe. Tackling European Security Challenges by EU-NATO Interaction, Baden-Baden (Nomos), pp. 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Balslev in this volume, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Agrell in this volume, p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Agrell in this volume, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Tiilikainen in this volume, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See for further discussion Günther Baechler (ed.) (1994): Beitreten oder Trittbrett-fahren? Die Zukunft der Neutralität in Europa, Chur/Zurich (Rüegger).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Norkus in this volume, p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Brown in this volume, p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Brown in this volume, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Brown in this volume, p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Geurts and Zbinden in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Baillie in this volume as well as Baillie (February 1997): A Theory of Small State Influence in the EU (Paper prepared for the 25th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops), Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baillie (1997), p. 3 (see note no. 33).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baillie (1992), p. 16 (see note no. 33).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See von Däniken in this volume, p. 47f.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baechler, G. (1998). Conclusions: Future Relevance and Priorities of Small States. In: Goetschel, L. (eds) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2832-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics