Levels of Abstraction in Computing Systems and Optical Interconnection Technology

  • Haldun M. Ozaktas


The design of a computing machine takes place at several levels of abstraction ranging from materials and device engineering to system architecture to high-level software. This system of levels of abstraction enables the design problem to be broken down into manageable subproblems, much as in a procedural programming language. On the other hand, it makes difficult the introduction of novel concepts and technologies such as optoelectronic device planes (“smart pixels”), which do not readily fit in the existing scheme of things. We try to develop an understanding of this system of levels of abstraction, why and how it resists the introduction of optical technology, and how one can modify it so as to successfully house optical technology. We argue that in the near future, optoelectronic technology can be successfully introduced if: (i) changing technology or applications create a significant bottleneck in the existing system of levels of abstraction that can be removed by the introduction of optical technology (e.g. interconnections, memory access); (ii) special purpose applications involving very few levels of abstraction can be identified (e.g. sensing, image processing); (iii) it is possible to modify a few levels of abstraction above the level that optical technology is introduced, so that the optical technology is smoothly “grafted” to the existing system of levels of abstraction (e.g. modifying communications schemes or standards so as to match the capabilities of optical switching systems, employing parallel architectures to match the parallel flow of information generated by optical subsystems).


Cellular Automaton Optical Technology Optical Memory Switching Network Optical Interconnection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. R. Feldman, S. C. Esener, C. C. Guest, and S. H. Lee. Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations. Applied Optics, 27: 1742–1751, 1988.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. R. Feldman, C. C. Guest, T. J. Drabik, and S. C. Esener. Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects for fine grain processor arrays based on interconnect density capabilities. Applied Optics, 28: 3820–3829, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. W. Goodman, F. J. Leonberger, S.-Y. Kung, and R. Athale. Optical interconnections for VLSI systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 72: 850–866, 1984.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. S. Hinton. Introduction to Photonic Switching Fabrics. Plenum, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. V. Krishnamoorthy, P. J. Marchand, F. E. Kiamilev, and S. C. Esener. Grain-size considerations for optoelectronic multistage interconnection networks. Applied Optics, 31: 5480–5507, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. A. B. Miller. Optics for low-energy communication inside digital processors: quantum detectors, sources and modulators as efficient impedance converters. Optics Letters, 14: 146–148, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Ozaktas. Using planes of optoelectronic devices interconnected by free–space optics: systems issues and application opportunities. Technical Report BL0111680–940922–57TM, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, New Jersey, Sept. 1994. AT&T Proprietary.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. M. Ozaktas. A Physical Approach to Communication Limits in Computation. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California, June 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. M. Ozaktas. Towards an optimal foundation architecture for optoelectronic computing. In Third International Conference on Massively Parallel Processing Using Optical Interconnections (MPPOI’96), pages 8–15. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. M. Ozaktas. Using planes of optoelectronic devices interconnected by free-space optics: systems issues and application opportunities. Technical Report BU-CEIS-9606, Bilkent University, Department of Computer Engineering and Information Sciences, Bilkent, Ankara, May 1996. Formerly AT&T Proprietary Report released May 7, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. M. Ozaktas and J. W. Goodman. The limitations of interconnections in providing communication between an array of points. In S. Tewksbury, editor, Frontiers of Computing Systems Research, volume 2, pages 61–130. Plenum Press, New York, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. M. Ozaktas and J. W. Goodman. Implications of interconnection theory for optical digital computing. Applied Optics, 31: 5559–5567, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. M. Ozaktas and J. W. Goodman. Comparison of local and global computation and its implications for the role of optical interconnections in future nanoelectronic systems. Optics Communications, 100: 247–258, 1993.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. M. Ozaktas and J. W. Goodman. Elements of a hybrid interconnection theory. Applied Optics, 33: 2968–2987, 1994.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haldun M. Ozaktas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringBilkent UniversityTurkey

Personalised recommendations