Abstract
The creation of a business introduction service removes a major barrier to the more efficient operation of the informal venture capital market by improving the flow of information between companies seeking finance and business angels. However, many investors also have other constraints on their ability to invest, including limits on the amount of finance that they have available for investing in unquoted SMEs, limitations on their expertise, the costs (monetary, and, in particular, time) of appraisal, monitoring and involvement, and uncertainty of exit routes. These can be addressed by other initiatives which encourage co-investment with venture capital funds, syndication between business angels and the pooling of investment funds. This chapter is concerned with these approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
End Notes to Chapter 14
In the early and mid-1980s in Finland a number of so-called ‘development companies’ were established which took majority equity stakes in companies in various industry sectors. Many of these investments subsequently proved to be high risk and many were lost.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lumme, A., Mason, C., Suomi, M. (1998). Promoting Informal Venture Capital: II. Co-Investing, Syndication and Indirect Investment Models. In: Informal Venture Capital. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2785-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2785-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5028-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2785-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive