Densitometric Anatomy

  • Sydney Lou Bonnick
Part of the Current Clinical Practice book series (CCP)


Densitometry was originally developed as a quantitative measurement technique, rather than as an imaging technique. Nevertheless, there are unique aspects to skeletal anatomy in the context of densitometric analysis that should be appreciated in order to properly utilize the technology and interpret the results.


Trabecular Bone Proximal Femur Lumbar Vertebra Bone Densitometry Posterior Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Recker RR (1992) Embryology, anatomy, and microstructure of bone. In Coe FL, Favus MJ, eds. Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, New York: Raven, pp. 219–240.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dempster DW (1992) Bone remodeling. In Coe FL, Favus MJ, eds. Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, New York: Raven, pp. 355–380.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schlenker RA, VonSeggen WW (1976) The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications for in vivo bone mass measurements. Calcif Tissue Res 20: 41–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eastell R, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, Amadio PC, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL (1989) Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles’ and vertebral fracture syndromes. J Clin Invest 83: 168–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson LC (1964) Morphologic analysis in pathology: the kinetics of disease and general biology of bone. In: Frost HM, ed. Bone Biodynamics, Boston: Little, pp. 543–564.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rockoff SD, Sweet E, Bleustein J (1969) The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res 3: 163–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nottestad SY, Baumel JJ, Kimmel DB, Recker RR, Heaney RP (1987) The proportion of trabecular bone in human vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res 2: 221–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eastell R, Mosekilde L, Hodgson SF, Riggs BL (1990) Proportion of human vertebral body bone that is cancellous. JBone Miner Res 5: 1237–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heaney RP. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonnick SL (1996) Bone densitometry techniques in modern medicine. In: Rosen C, ed. Osteoporosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Principles, Totowa, NJ, Humana, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Louis O, Van Den Winkel P, Covens P, Schoutens A, Osteaux M (1992) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar vertebrae: relative contribution of body and posterior elements and accuracy in relation with neutron activation analysis. Bone 13: 317–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazess RB, Barden HS (1990) Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11:347–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peel NFA, Johnson A, Barrington NA, Smith TWD, Eastell R (1993) Impact of anomalous vertebral segmentation of measurements of bone mineral density. JBone Miner Res 8: 719–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bornstein PE, Peterson RR (1996) Numerical variation of the presacral vertebral column in three population groups in North America. Am JPhys Anthropol 25: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krolner B, Berthelsen B, Nielsen SP (1982) Assessment of vertebral osteopeniacomparison of spinal radiography and dual-photon absorptiometry. Acta Radiol Diagn 23: 517–521.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rand T, Seidl G, Kainberger F, Resch A, Hittmair K, Schneider B, Gluer CC, Imhof H (1997) Impact of spinal degenerative changes on the evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). CalcifTissue Int 60: 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cann CE, Rutt BK, Genant HK (1983) Effect of extraosseous calcification on vertebral mineral measurement. Calcif Tissue Int 35: 667.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frye MA, Melton Li, Bryant SC, Fitzpatrick LA, Wahner HW, Schwartz RS, Riggs BL (1992) Osteoporosis and calcification of the aorta. Bone Miner 19: 185–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frohn J, Wilken T, Falk S, Stutte HJ, Kollath J, Hor G (1990) Effect of aortic sclerosis on bone mineral measurements by dual-photon absorptiometry. JNucl Med 32: 259–262.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T (1990) The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70: 1202–1207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reid IR, Evans MC, Ames R, Wattie DJ (1991) The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in post-menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72: 1372–1374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Banks LM, Lees B, MacSweeney JE, Stevenson JC. (1991) Do degenerative changes and aortic calcification influence long-term bone density measurements? Abstract. 8th International Workshop on Bone Densitometry, Bad Reichenhall, Germany.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A (1992) The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 50: 507–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stutzman ME, Yester MV, Dubovsky EV (1987) Technical aspects of dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine. Technique 15:177–181.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rupich RC, Griffin MG, Pacifici R, Avioli LV, Susman N (1992) Lateral dual-energy radiography: artifact error from rib and pelvic bone. J Bone Miner Res 7: 97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jergas M, Breitenseher M, Gluer CC, Black D, Lang P, Grampp S, Engelke K, Genant HK (1995) Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine? Osteoporosis Int 5:196–204.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goh JCH, Low SL, Bose K (1995) Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 57:340–343.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonnick SL, Nichols DL, Sanborn CF, Payne SG, Moen SM, Heiss CJ (1996) Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both? Calcif Tissue Int 58: 307–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Faulkner KG, Genant HK, McClung M (1995) Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56: 26–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hans D, Biot B, Schott AM, Meunier PJ (1996) No diffuse osteoporosis in lumbar scoliosis but lower femoral bone density on the convexity. Bone 18: 15–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nevitt MC, Lane NE, Scott JC, Hochberg MC, Pressman AR, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1995) Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density. Arthritis Rheum 38: 907–916.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Preidler KW, White LS, Tashkin J, McDaniel CO, Brossman J, Andresen R, Sartoris D (1997) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric densitometry in osteoarthritis of the hip. Influence of secondary bone remodeling of the femoral neck. Acta Radio! 38: 539–542.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karjalainen P, Alhava EM (1976) Bone mineral content of the forearm in a healthy population. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Bio116:199–208.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Borg J, Mollgaard A, Riis BJ (1995) Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 5: 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huddleston AL, Rockwell D, Kulund DN, Harrison B (1980). Bone mass in lifetime tennis athletes. JAMA 244: 1107–1109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sievanen H, Oja P, Vuori I (1994) The site-specific effects of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density and content. Bone 15: 279–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akesson K, Gardsell P, Sernbo I, Johnell O, Obrant KJ (1992) Earlier wrist fracture: a confounding factor in distal forearm bone screening. Osteoporosis Int 2: 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sydney Lou Bonnick
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas Woman’s UniversityDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations