Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

The standard polygenic model of biomedical genetics can be motivated by considering a quantitative trait determined by a large number of loci acting independently and additively [9]. In a pedigree of m people, let X ki be the contribution of locus k to person i. The trait value \( X_i = \sum\nolimits_k {X_i^k } \) for person i forms part of a vector \( X = (X_l , \ldots X_m )^t \) of trait values for the pedigree. If the effects of the various loci are comparable, then the central limit theorem implies that X follows an approximate multivariate normal distribution [13, 15]. Furthermore, independence of the various loci implies \( Cov(X_i ,X_j ) = \sum\nolimits_k {Cov(X_i^k ,X_j^k )} \). From our covariance decomposition for two non-inbred relatives at a single locus, it follows that

$$ Cov(X_i ,X_j ) = 2\Phi _{ij} \sigma _a^2 + \Delta 7_{ij} \sigma _a^2 , $$

where σ 2a and σ 2d are the additive and dominance genetic variances summed over all participating loci. These covariances can be expressed collectively in matrix notation as \( Var(X) = 2\sigma _a^2 \Phi + \sigma _d^2 \Delta _7 \). Again it is convenient to assume that X has mean E(X) = 0. Although it is an article of faith that the assumptions necessary for the central limit theorem actually hold for any given trait, one can check multivariate normality empirically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Sing CF (1986) The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods. Ann Hum Genet 50:181–194

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cannings C, Thompson EA, Skolnick MH (1978) Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Adv Appl Prob 10:26–61

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Daiger SP, Miller M, Chakraborty R (1984) Heritability of quantitative variation at the group-specific component (Gc) locus. Amer J Hum Genet 36:663–676

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation with incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc 539:1–38

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Elston RC, Stewart J (1971) A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 21:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Falconer DS (1965) The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidences among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 29:51–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer DS (1967) The inheritance of liability to diseases with variable age of onset, with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Ann Hum Genet 31:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernando RL, Stricker C, Elston RC (1994) The finite polygenic mixed model: An alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance. Theor Appl Genet 88:573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edinburgh 52:399–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holt SB (1954) Genetics of dermal ridges: Bilateral asymmetry in finger ridge-counts. Ann Eugenics 18:211–231

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hopper JL, Mathews JD (1982) Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis. Ann Hum Genet 46:373–383.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jennrich RJ, Sampson PF (1976) Newton-Raphson and related algorithms for maximum likelihood variance component estimation. Technometrics 18:11 – 17

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lange K (1978) Central limit theorems for pedigrees. J Math Biol 6:59–66

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange K (1997) An approximate model of polygenic inheritance.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange K, Boehnke M (1983) Extensions to pedigree analysis. IV. Covariance component models for multivariate traits. Amer J Med Genet 14:513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange K, Boehnke M, Weeks D (1987) Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiology 5:473–476

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lange K, Westlake J, Spence MA (1976) Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method. Ann Hum Genet 39:484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morton NE, MacLean CJ (1974) Analysis of family resemblance. III. Complex segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Amer J Hum Genet 26:489–503

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ott J (1979) Maximum likelihood estimation by counting methods under polygenic and mixed models in human pedigrees. Amer J Hum Genet 31:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peressini AL, Sullivan FE, Uhl JJ Jr (1988) The Mathematics of Nonlinear Programming. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao CR (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Strieker C, Fernando RL, Elston RC (1995) Linkage analysis with an alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance: The finite polygenic mixed model. Genetics 141:1651–1656

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lange, K. (1997). The Polygenic Model. In: Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Genetic Analysis. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2739-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2739-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2741-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2739-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics