Skip to main content

Bottomless Well

  • Chapter
One Jump Ahead
  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

Checkers is probably the world’s best-known board game. There are more than 150 variants, although only two have major international competitions. The version popular in North America (checkers) and the British Commonwealth (draughts) is played on an 8-by-8 board. So-called international checkers uses a 10-by-10 board and is played primarily in the Netherlands, the former Soviet Union, and parts of Africa. There is even a game called Canadian checkers that is played on a huge 12-by-12 board. Its popularity has waned, in part because it takes too long to complete a game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Most checkers books use a numeric notation, where each square is assigned a number from 1 to 32. I’m not using that notation because it’s hard to learn and difficult to use.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Asian game of go has even simpler rules—place a stone on an empty square on a 19-by-19 board. Despite the deceptive simplicity of the game, it is probably the most difficult board game to master, for man and machine. There is a $1,000,000 prize waiting to be claimed by the first person to write a go program capable of defeating the Taiwanese under-13-year-old champion in a match. Don’t expect anyone to claim the prize for at least a few decades.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin Bryant says, “It is not boring! Boring players make it boring.”

    Google Scholar 

  4. I’here is a group of dedicated analysts that are trying to prove the soundness of the barred openings. It’s possible that we may see more openings added to the three-move ballot in the near future.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minneapolis Star Tribune, May 21, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Original source unknown. Reproduced in Anthony Bishop’s The Encyclopedia of Checkers, privately published, 1978, available from the American Checker Federation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaeffer, J. (1997). Bottomless Well. In: One Jump Ahead. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2733-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2733-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2735-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2733-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics