The Nominal Categories Model

  • R. Darrell Bock


The nominal categories model (Bock, 1972), with its various specializations and extensions, comprises a large family of functions suitable for statistical description of individual qualitative behavior in response to identified stimuli. The models specify the probability of a person’s response in one of several mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories as a function of stimulus characteristics and person attributes. Bock’s nominal model, like Birnbaum’s (1968) binary item response model, is an elaboration of a primitive, formal model for choice between two alternatives.


Item Response Theory Item Parameter Item Response Model Partial Credit Model Posterior Standard Deviation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, E.B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple-choice questionnaires. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 26, 31–44.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43, 561–573.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord and M.R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 397–479 ). Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bock, R.D. (1956). A generalization of the law of comparative judgment applied to a problem in the prediction of choice (abstract). American Psychologist 11, 442.Google Scholar
  5. Bock, R.D. (1966). Estimating Multinomial Response Relations (Research Memorandum No. 5 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Educational Statistics Laboratory.Google Scholar
  6. Bock, R.D. (1970). Estimating multinomial response relations. In R.C. Bose, I.M. Chakravarti, P.C. Mahalanobis, C.R. Rao, and K.J.C. Smith (Eds.), Contributions to Statistics and Probability (pp. 111–132 ). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bock, R.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika 37, 29–51.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock, R.D. (1975). Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock, R.D. ( 1985, reprint). Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  10. Bock, R.D. (1989). Measurement of human variation: A two-stage model. In R.D. Bock (Ed.), Multilevel Analysis of Educational Data (pp. 319–342 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bock, R.D. and Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm Psychometrika 46, 443–445.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bock, R.D. and Jones, L.V. (1968). The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  13. Bock, R.D. and Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika 35, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradley, R.A. and Terry, M.E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. Method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324–345.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, 1–38Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, R.A. and Yates, F. (1953). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research ( 4th ed. ). New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  17. Goodman, L.A. (1970). The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gumbel, E.J. (1961). Bivariate logistic distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56, 335–349.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haberman, S.J. (1977). Log-linear models and frequency tables with small expected cell counts. Annals of Statistics 5, 1148–1169.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haberman, S.J. (1979). Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haberman, S.J. (1988). A warning on the use of chi-squared statistics with frequency tables with small expected cell counts. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 555–560.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Louis, T.A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 44, 226–233.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Mantel, N. (1966). Models for complex contingency tables and polychotomous dosage response curves. Biometrics 22, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47, 149–174.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKeon, J.J. (1961). Measurement procedures based on comparative judgment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  27. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muraki, E. and Bock, R.D. (1991). PARSCALE: Parametric Scaling of Rating Data. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  29. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. (1986). Numerical Recipes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data. Psychometric Monograph, No. 18.Google Scholar
  31. Samejima, F. (1979). A New Family of Models for the Multiple Choice Item (Research Report No. 79–4 ). Knoxville, TN: Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
  32. Shenton, L.R. and Bowman, K.O. (1977). Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Small Samples. New York: Macmillan.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG User’s Guide, Version 6. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  34. Thissen, D. and Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items. Psychometrika 49, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34, 278–286.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Darrell Bock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations