Skip to main content

Multicomponent Response Models

  • Chapter
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory

Abstract

Cognitive theory has made significant impact on theories of aptitude and intelligence. Cognitive tasks (including test items) are viewed as requiring multiple processing stages, strategies, and knowledge stores. Both tasks and persons vary on the processing components. That is, the primary sources of processing difficulty may vary between tasks, even when the tasks are the same item type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, E.B. (1980). Discrete Statistical Models with Social Science Applications. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. and Bonnett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, R., Dupuis, F.A., and Garneau, M. (1993). Effets des caracteristiques des items sur le role des composantes impliquees dans la performance enresolution de problemes mathematiques ecrits: une etude de validite de construit. Rapport Final Presente au Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l’Aide a la Recherche. Universite Laval, Santa-Foy, Quebec, Canada: Mars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D. (1975). Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember. In R. Glaser (Ed), Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol. 1 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., and Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of processing in the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimating with incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1983a). An incremental fix index for the linear logistic latent trait model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1983b). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin 93, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1984). A general multicomponent latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika 49, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1985). Multicomponent latent trait models for test design. In S. Embretson (Ed), Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics (pp. 195–218 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1994). Applications to cognitive design systems to test development. In C. Reynolds (Ed), Advances in Cognitive Assessment: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 107–135). Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1995a). A measurement model for linking individual learning to processes and knowledge: Application and mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement 32, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1995b). Working memory capacity versus general control processes in abstract reasoning. Intelligence 20, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. and Schneider, L.M. (1989). Cognitive models of analogical reasoning for psychometric tasks. Learning and Individual Differences 1, 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E., Schneider, L.M., and Roth, D.L. (1986). Multiple processing strategies and the construct validity of verbal reasoning tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 23, 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika 48, 3–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, R., Hoskens, M., and DeBoeck, P. (1991). A test of Embretson’s multicomponent model on vocabulary items. In R. Steyer and K. Widaman (Eds), Psychometric Methodology (pp. 187–190 ). Stuttgart, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. and Christal, R. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence 14, 389–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maris, E.M. (1992). Psychometric models for psychological processes and structures. Invited paper presented at the European Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Barcelona, Spain: Pompeau Fabre University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Larkin, J., and Kadane, P. (1984). A cognitive analysis of mathematical problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 2 (pp. 231–273 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollam, K. and Embretson, S.E. (1993). Components or strategies? The basis of individual differences in spatial processing. Unpublished paper. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R.J. and Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3: Item Analysis and Test Scoring with Binary Logistic Models. In: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, T., Pellegrino, J.W., and Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology 12, 252–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J.W., Mumaw, R., and Shute, V. (1985). Analyses of spatial aptitude and expertise. In S. Embretson (Ed), Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics (pp. 45–76 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man. New York: Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning: The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S.E. (1980). Multicomponent latent trait models for ability tests. Psychometrika 45, 479–494.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S.E. (1981). Measuring aptitude processes with multicomponent latent trait models. Journal of Educational Measurement 18, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S.E. and Schneider, L.M. (1980). Process Outcome Models for Verbal Aptitude. (Technical Report NIE-80–1). Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Embretson, S.E. (1997). Multicomponent Response Models. In: van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K. (eds) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2691-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics