Abstract
Cognitive theory has made significant impact on theories of aptitude and intelligence. Cognitive tasks (including test items) are viewed as requiring multiple processing stages, strategies, and knowledge stores. Both tasks and persons vary on the processing components. That is, the primary sources of processing difficulty may vary between tasks, even when the tasks are the same item type.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, E.B. (1980). Discrete Statistical Models with Social Science Applications. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Bentler, P.M. and Bonnett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588–606.
Bertrand, R., Dupuis, F.A., and Garneau, M. (1993). Effets des caracteristiques des items sur le role des composantes impliquees dans la performance enresolution de problemes mathematiques ecrits: une etude de validite de construit. Rapport Final Presente au Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l’Aide a la Recherche. Universite Laval, Santa-Foy, Quebec, Canada: Mars.
Bock, R.D. (1975). Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember. In R. Glaser (Ed), Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol. 1 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., and Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of processing in the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97.
Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimating with incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
Embretson, S.E. (1983a). An incremental fix index for the linear logistic latent trait model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Los Angeles, CA.
Embretson, S.E. (1983b). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin 93, 179–197.
Embretson, S.E. (1984). A general multicomponent latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika 49, 175–186.
Embretson, S.E. (1985). Multicomponent latent trait models for test design. In S. Embretson (Ed), Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics (pp. 195–218 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Embretson, S.E. (1994). Applications to cognitive design systems to test development. In C. Reynolds (Ed), Advances in Cognitive Assessment: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 107–135). Plenum.
Embretson, S.E. (1995a). A measurement model for linking individual learning to processes and knowledge: Application and mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement 32, 277–294.
Embretson, S.E. (1995b). Working memory capacity versus general control processes in abstract reasoning. Intelligence 20, 169–189.
Embretson, S.E. and Schneider, L.M. (1989). Cognitive models of analogical reasoning for psychometric tasks. Learning and Individual Differences 1, 155–178.
Embretson, S.E., Schneider, L.M., and Roth, D.L. (1986). Multiple processing strategies and the construct validity of verbal reasoning tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 23, 13–32.
Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika 48, 3–26.
Janssen, R., Hoskens, M., and DeBoeck, P. (1991). A test of Embretson’s multicomponent model on vocabulary items. In R. Steyer and K. Widaman (Eds), Psychometric Methodology (pp. 187–190 ). Stuttgart, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Kyllonen, P. and Christal, R. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence 14, 389–434.
Maris, E.M. (1992). Psychometric models for psychological processes and structures. Invited paper presented at the European Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Barcelona, Spain: Pompeau Fabre University.
Mayer, R., Larkin, J., and Kadane, P. (1984). A cognitive analysis of mathematical problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 2 (pp. 231–273 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
McCollam, K. and Embretson, S.E. (1993). Components or strategies? The basis of individual differences in spatial processing. Unpublished paper. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.
Mislevy, R.J. and Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3: Item Analysis and Test Scoring with Binary Logistic Models. In: Scientific Software.
Mulholland, T., Pellegrino, J.W., and Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology 12, 252–284.
Pellegrino, J.W., Mumaw, R., and Shute, V. (1985). Analyses of spatial aptitude and expertise. In S. Embretson (Ed), Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics (pp. 45–76 ). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man. New York: Macmillan.
Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning: The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Whitely, S.E. (1980). Multicomponent latent trait models for ability tests. Psychometrika 45, 479–494.
Whitely, S.E. (1981). Measuring aptitude processes with multicomponent latent trait models. Journal of Educational Measurement 18, 67–84.
Whitely, S.E. and Schneider, L.M. (1980). Process Outcome Models for Verbal Aptitude. (Technical Report NIE-80–1). Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Embretson, S.E. (1997). Multicomponent Response Models. In: van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K. (eds) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2849-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2691-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive