The Logical Status of Case Histories

  • Willem A. Wagenaar
  • Sherrill Mulhern
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 291)

Abstract

Much of the discussion on the ontology of forgotten and recovered memories seems to rest upon the interpretation of case histories. I will argue that the logical status of case histories is often poorly understood. As a consequence case histories have the effect of strengthening biases instead of testing theories. I suspect that this problem is introduced through the intertwining of psychology and legal practice. But the difference between science and justice is obvious: while juries and courts of judges use psychological theory to decide about a single case, scientists use single case histories to decide about general theories. If a case history does not allow generalization, it is irrelevant to us, no matter how relevant the trial might have been to those who were involved.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Child Abuse Case History Child Sexual Abuse Logical Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees (1994). Statement on memories of sexual abuse, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 261–264.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, D. (1988). How accurate is polygraph lie detection? In A. Gale (Ed.), The Polygraph Test: Lies, truth and science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Dawes, R.M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press. Femina, D.D., Yeager, C.A. and Lewis, D.O. (1990). Child abuse: Adolescent records vs. adult recall. Child Abuse and Neglect, 145, 227–331.Google Scholar
  4. Jampole, L., and Weber, M.K. (1987). An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 187–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Loftus, E., and Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory: False memories and allegations of sexual abuse. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  7. Pennington, N., and Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Praag, H.M. V. (1993). Make-believes, Psychiatry or the perils of progress. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  9. Schünemann, B., and Bandilla, W. (1989). Perseverance in courtroom decisions. In: H. Wegener, F. L6sel and J.Google Scholar
  10. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: psychological perspectives (pp. 181–192). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Wagenaar, W.A., Koppen, P.J. van, and Crombag, H.F.M. (1993). Anchored narratives. The psychology of criminal evidence. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Wason, P.C., and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford (in particular chapter 13 ).Google Scholar
  13. Williams, L. M. (1994). Recall of childhood trauma: A prospective study of women’s memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1167–1176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ziskin, J. (1995). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony. Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (1983). 20/20: The People Inside Me. Denver, CO: Journal Graphics, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Angel, R. and Thoits, P. (1987). The Impact of Culture on the Cognitive Structure of Illness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 11, 465–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. APA (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III). Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  18. APA (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV). Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  19. Armstrong, L. (1994). Rocking the Cradle of Sexual Politics: What happened when women said incest. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. Balch, R.W. and Gilliam, M. (1991). Devil worship in western Montana: A case study in rumor construction. In Richardson, J.T., Best, J. and Bromley, D.G. (Eds.), The Satanism Scare. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Barrois, C. (1988). Les Névroses Traumatiques. Paris, Dunod.Google Scholar
  22. Bass, E. and Davis, L. (1988). The Courage to Heal. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Braun, B.G. and Gray, G. (1987). Report on the 1986 mpd questionnaire - MPD and cult involvement. Fourth International Conference on Multiple Personality/ Dissociative States. Alexandria, VA: Audio Transcripts Va-383–87.Google Scholar
  24. Edelman, N. (1995). Voyantes, Guérisseuses, et Visionnaires en France.’ 1785–1914. Paris: Alb in Michel.Google Scholar
  25. Elliot, D. (1982). State Intervention and Childhood Multiple Personality Disorder. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 10, 441–456.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, B. (1990). Cattle mutilation: Contemporary legends and contemporary mythologies. Perspectives on Contemporary Legend Conference. Sheffield, England.Google Scholar
  27. Ernsdorff, G.M. and Loftus, E.F. (1993). Let Sleeping Memories Lie? Words of caution about tolling the statue of limitations in cases of memory repression. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84:1, 129–174.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. (1950). Letter of 21, September, 1887. In Bonaparte, M., Freud, A. and Kris, E. (Eds. and Trans.), The origins of psychoanalysis: Letters to Wilhelm Fliess, drafts and notes: 1887–1902. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1952). Zur ätiologie der hysterie. Weitere bemerkungen über die abwehr-neuropsychosen. GW, I. London: Imago. (Original work published, 1886 ).Google Scholar
  30. Gil, E. (1990). United We Stand: A book for people with multiple personalities. Walnut Creek, CA: Launch Press. Greaves, G. (1986). Book Review. ISSMPandD Newsletter, 4:3,3.Google Scholar
  31. Greaves, G. (1984). Editorial. International Society for the Study of Multiple Personality Newsletter, 2:2, 4.Google Scholar
  32. Hacking, I. (1992). The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In Pickering, A. (Ed.), Science and Practice and Culture, (pp. 29–64 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Janet, P. (1911). L’Etat Mental des Hystériques. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  34. Janet, P. (1889). L’Automatisme Psychologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  35. Kempe, C.H., Silverman, F.N., Steele, B.F. Droegemueller, W. and Silver, H.K. (1962). The Battered-Child Syndrome. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kluft, R.P. (1991). Clinical Presentations of Multiple Personality Disorder. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14:13, 605–630.Google Scholar
  37. Krohn, A. (1978) Hysteria the Elusive Neurosis. Psychological Issues, Monograph 45–46, 11, 1/2.Google Scholar
  38. Lawrence, J.R. and Perry, C. (1988). Hypnosis, Will and Memory. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Littlewood, R. (1996). Psychopathology, Embodiment and Religious Innovation. In Bhugra, D. (Ed.), Psychiatry and Religion: Context, Consensus and Controversies. (pp. 178–197 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Loftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyons, A. (1970). The Second Coming. New York: Dood, Mead and Company.Google Scholar
  42. Micale, M.S. (1995). Approaching Hysteria. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mulhern, S. (1994). Satanism, Ritual abuse and Multiple Personality: A socio/historical perspective. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62.4, 265–288.Google Scholar
  44. Mulhem, S. (1995). Inceste au Carrefour des Fantasmes et des Fantômes. In Castro, D. (Ed.), Incestes (pp.). Paris: l’Esprit du Temps - Psychologie.Google Scholar
  45. Orne, M.T. (1979) The use and misuse of hypnosis in court. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 311–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orne, M.T. (1959) The nature of hypnosis: artifact and essence.“ Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 58, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Padzer, L. and Smith, M. (1980). Michelle Remembers. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  48. Putnam, F.W. (1989). Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rivera, G. (1988). Devil Worship: Exposing Satan’s underground. New York: Journal Graphics, Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Ross, C.A. (1996). Dissociative Identity Disorder. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Rush, F. (1980). The Best Kept Secret: The sexual abuse of children. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  52. Rush, F. (1971). The Sexual Abuse of Children: A feminist point of view. Paper presented at the New York Radical Feminist Rape Conference, April, 1971.Google Scholar
  53. Scheper-Hughes, N. and Stein, H.F. (1987). Child Abuse and the Unconscious in American Popular Culture. In. Scheper-Hughes, N. (Ed.), Child Survival (pp.). Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  54. Spiegel, H. (1980) Hypnosis and evidence: help or hinderance? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 73–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spiegel, H. (1974) The grade 5 syndrome: the highly hypnotizable person. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 303–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Victor, J.S. (1993). Satanic Panic: The creation of a contemporary legend. Chicago: Open Court. Warnke, M. (1972). The Satan Seller. New Jersey: Logos International.Google Scholar
  57. Wilbur, C. (1984). Multiple Personality and Child Abuse: An Etiologic Overview. First International Conference on Multiple Personality/ Dissociative States. Alexandria, VA: Audio Transcripts Va-IA-127–84Google Scholar
  58. Young, A. (1995). The Harmony of Illusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem A. Wagenaar
    • 1
  • Sherrill Mulhern
    • 2
  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Ecole des Hautes Etudes des Sciences SocialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations