Advertisement

The Prediction of Accurate Recollections of Trauma

  • Constance J. Dalenberg
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 291)

Abstract

The issue of recovered memories of child abuse has emerged as a lightning rod for rhetoric in the last decade. Clinicians who took these memories seriously in most recent years, sometimes with caution and compassion, at other times with a singleminded bias toward acceptance, were labeled “recovered memory therapists” (Ofshe & Watters, 1994; Wakefield & Underwager, 1994). Arguments were made that these clinicians may deserve condemnation “as a new class of sexual predator, causing psychological trauma equivalent to rape (Ofshe & Watters, p. 7). In response to what they perceive as zealous and negligent acceptance of such memories, some theorists appeared to advocate singleminded rejection of recovered memory of abuse, making categorical statements that ”people who experience severe trauma remember it“ (Wakefield & Underwager, 1994, p. 182). Exaggerated claims from both ”sides“ of the controversy culminated in highly biased and non-validated checklists (e.g., Fredrickson, 1992; Gardner, 1995) which purported to be helpful for making legal and clinical decisions despite the absence of supportive scientific research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dalenberg, C. (in press). Accuracy, timing and circumstances of disclosure in therapy of recovered and continuous memories of abuse. Psychiatry and the Law Google Scholar
  2. Fredrickson, R. (1992). Repressed memories: a journey to recovery from sexual abuse. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  3. Freyd, J. (1983). Shareability: The social psychology of epistemology. Cognitive Science, 7, 191–210. Gardner, R. (1995). Protocols for the sex-abuse evaluation. Cresskill, N. J.: Creative Therapeutics.Google Scholar
  4. Lindsay, D. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. Ross, J. D. Read, and M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. (pp. 27–55 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McConkey, K. & Kinoshita, S. (1988) The influence of hypnosis on memory after one day and one week. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ofshe, R., & Watters, E. (1994). Making monsters: False memories, psychotherapy, and sexual hysteria. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  7. Wakefield, H., & Underwager, R. (1994). Return of the furies: An investigation into recovered memory therapy. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Weiss, J., & Sampson, H. (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observations, and empirical research. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Williams, L. (1995). Recovered memories of abuse in women with documented child sexual victimization histories. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 649–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constance J. Dalenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Trauma Research InstituteCalifornia School of Professional PsychologySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations