Fluctuating Benefits and Collective Action

  • Bernardo A. Huberman
Part of the Advances in Computational Economics book series (AICE, volume 6)


We show that when individuals confronted with a social dilemma contribute to the common good with an effort that fluctuates in time, they can make the group generate an average utility that actually decreases in time. This paradoxical behavior takes place in spite of the fact that typically individuals are found to be contributing at any given time. This novel phenomenon, which we verified in a number of computer experiments, is the result of an intermittency effect, whereby unlikely bursts of defection determine the average behavior of the group. Besides providing a dynamical theory for the lognormal distribution found in some sociological data, these results show that the typical behavior of individuals comprising a group can be inconsistent with its average properties.


Collective Action Stochastic Differential Equation Common Good Linear Stability Analysis Constraint Satisfaction Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, Ludwig, 1992, Stochastic Differential Equations: Theory and Applications,Krieger Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Bendor, Jonathan and Dilip Mookherjee, 1987, `Institutional structure and the logic of ongoing collective action’, American Political Science Review 81 (1), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clearwater, Scott, Bernardo A. Huberman, and Tad Hogg, 1991, `Cooperative solution of constraint satisfaction problems’, Science 254, 1181–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glance, Natalie and Bernardo A. Huberman, 1994, `The dynamics of social dilemmas’, Scientific American, March, 76–81.Google Scholar
  5. Glance, Natalie and Bernardo A. Huberman, 1993a, `Organizational fluidity and sustainable cooperation’, in K. Carley and M. Prietula (Eds), Computational Organization Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 217–240.Google Scholar
  6. Glance, Natalie and Bernardo A. Huberman, 1993b, `The outbreak of cooperation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 17 (4), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Granovetter, Mark, 1978, `Threshold models of collective behavior’, American Journal of Sociology 83 (6), 1420–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardin, Garret, 1968, `The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162, 1243–1248. Hardin, Russell, 1982, Collective Action, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Huberman, Bernardo A., 1990, `The performance of cooperative processes’, Physica D 42, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huberman, Bernardo A. and Natalie Glance, 1993, `Diversity and collective action’, in H. Haken and A Mikhailov (Eds), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Complex Nonlinear Phenomena, Springer-Verlag, pp. 44–64.Google Scholar
  11. Huberman, Bernardo A. and Natalie Glance, 1996, `Fluctuating efforts and sustainable cooperation’, in K. Carley and M. Prietula (Eds), Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions, MIT Press, to appear.Google Scholar
  12. Huberman, Bernardo A. and Natalie Glance, 1997, `Beliefs and cooperation’, in P. Danielson (Ed.), Modelling Rational and Moral Agents, Oxford University Press, pp. 211–236.Google Scholar
  13. Marwell, Gerald, 1970, `Comment on Scott and El-Assal’, American Sociological Review 35, 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliver, Pamela E. and Gerald Marwell, 1988, `The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass. II’, American Sociological Review 53, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olson, Mancur, 1965, The Logic of Collective Action,Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Schelling, Thomas C., 1978, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt, Steffen, James Scott, Carl Lande, and Laura Gausti, 1977, Friends, Followers and Factions, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  18. Stratonovich, R.L., 1967, Topics in the Theory of Random Noise,Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, Michael, 1976, Anarchy and Cooperation,John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernardo A. Huberman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations