Skip to main content

Probability of Obtaining a Pure Strategy Equilibrium in Matrix Games with Random Payoffs

  • Chapter
Game Theoretical Applications to Economics and Operations Research

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLC,volume 18))

Abstract

If the payoffs in an mXn zero-sum matrix game are drawn randomly from a finite set of numbers, N, then the probability of obtaining a pure strategy equilibrium, p, will be a weighted sum of the probabilities of obtaining a pure strategy equilibrium, ps, with s distinct payoffs, the weights, qs being the probabilities of obtaining s distinct payoffs from N. However, as N → ∞ the probability qmn → 1. In this limiting case p = Pmn Although pmn has been derived by Goldman (1957) and Papavassilopoulos (1995), our method is more general. We show that pmn= Σtp tmn where p tmn denotes the probability of obtaining a pure strategy equilibrium for the tth (t = 1,...,s(= mn)) ordinal payoff, the ordinality being the rank when the payoffs are put in an ascending order.

Further, we introduce the notion of separation of arrays, S(rk ,cl), which is a necessary and sufficient condition for the equilibrium of an mXn zero-sum matrix game to be associated with a mixed strategy solution. This generalizes the notion of sepatation of diagonals for 2X2 zero-sum matrix games derived by Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1953).

It can be easily verified that as m or n increases pmn decreases. Then given the importance of strong equilibrium, which is always a pure strategy equilibrium, a possible behaviourial interpretation is that players may prefer to play games with less number of strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babu P, Guruswamy (1994), “Common Belief”, A paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Indian Econometric Society, University of Mysore, Mysore, May 1–3, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, Kaushik (1992), “Markets, Laws and Governments”, Bimal Jalan (Editor) The Indian Economy: Problems and Prospects, Penguin, New Delhi, pp.338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dresher, Melvin (1970), “Probability of a Pure Equilibrium Point in Person Games”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Vol.8, pp.134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman, A J (1957), “The Probability of a Saddlepoint”, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol.64, pp.729–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harsanyi, John C (1973), “Games with Randomly Disturbed Payoffs: A New Rationale for Mixed Strategy”, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol.2, pp.1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luce Duncan and Raiffa, H (1957), Games and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra, Srijit (1994), “A Note on A Property of Matrix Games with Random Payoffs: A Curiosity Explored”, Centre for Development Studies, November 17, 1994, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra, Srijit and Kumar T Krishna (1994), “A Property of Matrix Games with Random Pay offs: A Curiosity Explored,” A paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Indian Econometric Society, University of Mysore, Mysore, May 1–3, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mishra, Srijit and Kumar T Krishna (1997), “On the Probability of Existence of Pure Equilibria in Matrix Games”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann, John Von and Morgenstern, Oskar (1953), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Third edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papavassilopoulos, V P (1995), “On the Probability of Existence of Pure Equilibria in Matrix Games”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 87, pp.419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Powers, I Y (1990), “Limiting Distributions of the Number of Pure Strategy Nash Equilibria in N Person Games”, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol.19, pp.277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy M Atchi (1996), Lands and Tenants in South India: A study of Nelore District 1850–1990, Oxford University Press, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein, Ariel (1991), “Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory”, Econometrica, Vol.59, pp.909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mishra, S., Kumar, T.K. (1997). Probability of Obtaining a Pure Strategy Equilibrium in Matrix Games with Random Payoffs. In: Parthasarathy, T., Dutta, B., Potters, J.A.M., Raghavan, T.E.S., Ray, D., Sen, A. (eds) Game Theoretical Applications to Economics and Operations Research. Theory and Decision Library, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2640-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2640-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4780-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2640-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics