Skip to main content

Generic Strategy Research: Application of LISREL and Smallest Space Analysis

  • Chapter

Abstract

The concept of generic strategies remains the principal framework in discussions of business-level strategy formulation in research and teaching. Given that generic strategy typologies (e.g., Porter, 1980; Mintzberg, 1988) represent latent constructs, researchers have predominantly employed Factor Analysis to identify underlying dimensions among observed variables (i.e., generic competitive methods). However for the generic strategy research stream to progress, statistical techniques that examine the relative “goodness-of-fit” of different typologies to empirical field data are sorely needed. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the appropriateness and application of LISREL and Smallest Space Analysis (SSA) for generic strategy research. Specifically, we argue that the use of these techniques allow researchers to clarify and crystallize some of the assertions underlying the concept of generic strategies and to test them more rigorously than in the past.

The authors thank Roger Dunbar, Arun Kumaraswamy, the Editors and the participants at the conference for their valuable and insightful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansoff, Igor (1965), Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J., Brief, A. P., George, J. M., Roberson, L., and Webster, J. (1989), `Measuring affect at work: Confirmatory analyses of competing mood structures with conceptual linkages to cortical regulatory systems,’ Journal of personality and social psychology, 57, pp 1091–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calingo, L. M. R. (1989), Environmental determinants of generic competitive strategies, Human Relations, 42, pp 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G. and Davis, P. S. (1984), `Porter’s generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance,’ Academy of Management Review, 27, pp 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968), A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, pp 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. (1983), `An empirical typology of mature industrial product environments,’ Academy of Management Journal, 26, pp 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1986), LISREL VI: User’s Guide, Mooresville, IN: Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, E. S. and Levin, J. (1972), The use of smallest space analysis in studying scale structure: An application to the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 56, 4, pp 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. and Lim, Y. (1988), Environment, Generic Strategies, and Performance in a rapidly developing country: A taxonomic approach. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 4, pp 802–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S., Dunbar, R. L. M. and Bird, A. (1995), Strategic action generation: A comparison of emphasis placed on generic competitive methods by US and Japanese managers. Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S. and Vadlamani, B. L. (1995), Assessing generic strategies: An empirical investigation of two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries. Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp 7583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. (1973), The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series. Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. C. (1983), Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C. (1978), Organization Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw- Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H. (1986), Porter’s (1980), generic strategies and performance: An empirical examination with American Data. Organization Studies, 7,3 pp 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1988), `Generic Strategies: Toward a comprehensive framework,’ Advances in Strategic Management, 5, pp 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, P. (1993), On the evidence of competitive strategy: Evidence from a large multiproduct US firm. Academy of Management Journal. 36, 6: pp 1652–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf, D. and Rose, T. (1988), ‘Some theory and application of confirmatory second-order factor analysis,’ Multivariate Behavioral Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.. B. and Pearce, J. A. (1988), `Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business unit performance,’ Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I. M. and Guttman, L. (1969), Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests. Psychological Bulletin, 71, pp 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z. & Zevulun, E. (1979), On the use of facet analysis in organizational behavior research: some conceptual considerations and an example. Organizational behavior and human performance, 23, pp 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segev, E. (1989), A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategic typologies. Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J. and Shortell, S. M. (1989), Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, Direction, and Performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 5: pp 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotha, S., Vadlamani, B., Nair, A. (1997). Generic Strategy Research: Application of LISREL and Smallest Space Analysis. In: Ghertman, M., Obadia, J., Arregle, JL. (eds) Statistical Models for Strategic Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2614-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics