Skip to main content

The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance: A LISREL Approach

  • Chapter
Statistical Models for Strategic Management

Abstract

The paper examines the effects of strategic technology alliances on corporate performance. In using a LISREL-model the following five different (groups of) factors were specified to analyze these effects: sectoral features, national circumstances, company structure, innovativeness and external linkages. The paper explaines the theoretical and statistical reasons why a particular LISREL-model was chosen to analyze effects of strategic technology alliances on corporate performance instead of applying other multivariate techniques. It describes the application of a particular LISREL approach, a structural equation model with observed variables. It concludes that there apparently is no straightforward relationship between strategic technology partnering and company performance. However, the application of LISREL models certainly did improve the general understanding of the effects of strategic technology alliances beyond more traditional statistical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansoff, I. and McDonnell, E. (1990), Implanting Strategic Management,London (Prentice Hall). Bain, J.S. (1956), Barriers to new competition,Cambridge (Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S.V., Duncan, J. and Friedman, P. (1982), Joint Venture Strategies and Corporate Innovation, Cambridge, Ma. (Oelgeschlager).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables,New York (John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levin, R.C. (1989), ‘Empirical studies of innovation and market structure’, in: R.Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, Amsterdam (North Holland), pp 1059–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F.J. and Lorange, P. (1988), ‘Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures’, in: F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington (Lexington Books), pp 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. and J. Kay (1990), ‘Assessing corporate performance’, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 1, no. 2, pp 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P.J., Lee, N., Jones, R.M., and Tyson, W.J. (1986), An introduction to industrial economics,Fourth edition, London (George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1984), Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. London (Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1982), The economics of industrial innovation,London (Pinter Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (1988), Basic Econometrics,2nd Edition, New York (McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (1992), Essentials of Econometrics,New York (McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1989), The Dynamic Analysis of Innovation and Diffusion. London (Pinter Publishers). Hagedoorn, J. (1990), ‘Organizational modes of inter-firm co-operation and technology transfer’. In: Technovation,10/1, pp 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoom, J. (1993), ‘Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences’, in: Strategic Management Journal 14 (5), pp. 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Schakenraad J. (1990a), ‘Inter-firm partnerships and co-operative strategies in core technologies’, in: C. Freeman and L. Soete (Eds.), New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change, London (Pinter Publishers), pp 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoom, J. and Schakenraad J. (1990b), Technology Cooperation, Strategic Alliances, and their motives: Brother, can you spare a dime, or do you have a light?, Paper for SMS conference, Stockholm, September 24–27, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Schakenraad, J. (1994), `The effect of strategic technology partnering on company performance’, in Strategic Management Journal 15 (1), pp 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D.A. and Morris, D.J. (1979), Industrial Economics: Theory and Evidence,Oxford (OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.A. (1987), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, Essentials and Advances,Baltimore/London (Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, K.J. (1985), International Joint Ventures,Lexington (Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, K.J. (1988), ‘R&D and international joint ventures’. In: F.J. Contractor, P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington (Lexington Books), pp 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1977), ‘A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures’, in: D.J. Aigner and A.S. Goldberger (eds.), Latent Variables in Socio-Economic Models, Amsterdam (North-Holland), pp 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1977), ‘Statistical Models and methods for Analysis of Longitudinal Data’. in: D.J. Aigner and A.S. Goldberger (eds.), Latent Variables in Socio-Economic Models, Amsterdam (North-Holland), pp 285–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom D. (1993),LISREL ® User’s Reference Guide, Chicago,(Scientific Software International, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I. and Schwartz, N.L. (1982), Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge (CUP). Kleinbaum, D. (1994), Logistic regression: A self-learning text. New York (Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and Bauer, L.L. (1989), Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing: Assessing Policy Initiatives and Corporate Strategies,Lexington (Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (1994a), ‘Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL’, in Lewis-Beck, M. (Ed), Factor analysis and related techniques. London (Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (1994b), ’ Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL’, in Lewis-Beck, M. (Ed), Factor analysis and related techniques. London (Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1984), ‘R&D and innovation: some empirical findings’, in: Z. Griliches (ed.) R&D,Patents, and productivity, Chicago (University of Chicago Press), pp 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1986), The modern corporation - Profits, power, growth and performance. Brighton (Wheatsheaf Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. (1996), Basic principles of structural equation modeling. An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York (Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1985), Traid power. New York (Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1991), Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: An important case of ‘non-globalisation’, in: Journal of International Business Studies, 22, no. 1, pp 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., Robson M. and Townsend J. (1987), ‘The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–1983’, in: Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, no. 3, pp 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, A. (1971), Technology and marketstructure. Lexington (Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. and Stronkhorst, H. (1984), Causal Modeling in Nonexperimental Research, an Introduction to the LISREL Approach. Amsterdam (Sociometric Research Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1965), ‘Firm size, marketstructure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions’. In: American Economic Review, 15, no. 5, pp 1097–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1984), Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives,Cambridge, Ma. (MIT Press). Schmalensee, R. (1989), ‘Inter-industry studies of structure and performance’. In: R.Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization,Vol. 2, Amsterdam (North Holland), pp 951–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and economic growth. Boston (Harvard University Press). Scott, M. (1995), Applied logistic regression analysis. London (Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L. (1979), ‘Firm size and inventive activity-the evidence reconsidered’, in: European Economic Review, no. 12, pp 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hagedoorn, J., Sadowski, B., Schakenraad, J. (1997). The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance: A LISREL Approach. In: Ghertman, M., Obadia, J., Arregle, JL. (eds) Statistical Models for Strategic Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2614-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics