Abstract
Designers bring their prior experience and expertise to the design process whenever they read drawings, draw, or design or when they observe. It is for this reason that one cannot separate the process from the expertise of the designer. What is designed is integrally tied to the designer. The question then arises: “Are there notable differences between experienced and not-so-experienced designers, and if there are, what form do they take?” In this chapter we summarize our previous work on identifying the differences between the approaches of designers with different levels of expertise. These include the differences in recall of drawings, in reasoning about motion, in reasoning about drawings, and in designing. We present the implications of this work on the design process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adelson, B. (1981). Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory and Cognition, 9, 422–433.
Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 483–495.
Akin, O. (1978). How do architects design. In Latombe (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer Aided Design, IFIP North Holland.
Chase, W. G., and Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
Chase, W. G., and Ericsson, K. A. (1981). Skilled memory. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chovan, J. C., and Waldron, M. B. (1990). The use of function and form when reading mechanical engineering drawings by experts and non-experts. Proceedings of the Second International ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Chicago, pp. 137–143.
Cooper, L. (1983). Flexibility in representational systems. In J. Beck, B. Hope, and A. Rozenfeld (Eds.), Human and Machine Vision. Orlando, Fl: Academic Press.
Earle, J. (1985). Engineering Design Graphics. New York: Wiley.
Cunningham, J. J., and Dixon, J. R. (1988). Designing with features: The origin of features. Proceedings 1988 ASME Computers in Engineering Conf. pp. 237–243.
Cutkosky, M. R., Tenenbaum, J. M., and Muller, D. (1988). Features in process-based design. Proceedings 1988 ASME Computers in Engineering Conf. pp. 557–562.
Dixon, J. R., Cunningham, J. J., and Simmons, M. K. (1987). Research on designing with features. IFIP WG 5.2 First International Workshop on Intelligent CAD. Cambridge, MA, Oct. 6–8.
Hegarty, M., Just, M. A., and Morrison, I. R. (1988). Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 191–236.
Luby, S. C., Dixon, J. R., and Simmons, M. K. (1986). Designing with features: Creating and using a features data base for evaluation of manufacturability of castings. Proceedings 1986 ASME Computers in Engineering Conf. pp. 285–292.
Neves, D. M., and Anderson, J. R. (1981). Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reitman, J. S. (1976). Skilled perception in go: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 336–356.
Stauffer, L. A. and Ullman, D. G. (1988). A comparison of the results of empirical studies into the mechanical design process, Design Studies, 9 (2), 107–114.
Waldron, M. B. (1989). Observations on management of initial design specifications in conceptual mechanical design. Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Proceedings ICED 89, Harrogate, pp. 189–201.
Waldron, M. B., and Herren, L. T. (1994). The effect of expertise on judgments requiring spatial reasoning. Unpublished paper, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Waldron, M. B., Jelinek, W., Owen, D. H., and Waldron, K. J. (1987). Strategy differences between expert and naive mechanical designers. In ICED Proceedings 1987, Boston, MA, pp. 86–94.
Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1988). A time sequence study of a complex mechanical system design, Design Studies, 9 (2), 95–106.
Waldron, M. B., Waldron, K. J., and Abdelhamied, K. (1989). The differences in reading schematic drawings of mechanisms by expert and naive mechanical designers. Proceedings of the First International ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Montreal, pp. 15–20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (1996). The Influence of the Designer’s Expertise on the Design Process. In: Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (eds) Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2563-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2561-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive