General Approach to Surgical Pathology Specimens

  • Ralph H. Hruban
  • William H. Westra
  • Timothy H. Phelps
  • Christina Isacson

Abstract

The key to safety in the surgical pathology laboratory is to recognize that this area is a dangerous place. A variety of noxious chemicals are routinely used in the surgical pathology laboratory, and tissues infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis viruses, mycobacteria, and other agents enter through its doors on a daily basis. Not only are these infectious agents present in the laboratory, but their transmission is also facilitated by the frequent handling of bloody tissues and the routine use of surgical blades, knives, saws, and other sharp instruments. Clearly, the surgical pathology laboratory is no place to “let down one’s guard” by becoming careless or distracted. Rather, safety in the work area should become an ingrained habit, and universal precautions should be exercised with all specimens.

Keywords

Surgical Margin Surgical Pathology Sharp Instrument Surgical Pathology Report Perpendicular Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Standardization of the surgical pathology report. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 84–86.Google Scholar
  2. Bell JE, Ironside JW. How to tackle a possible Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 1993; 46: 193–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooke RA, Stewart B. Colour Atlas of Anatomical Pathology. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Fazzini E, Weber D, Waldo E. A Manual for Surgical Pathologists. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas; 1972.Google Scholar
  5. Geller SA, Gerber MA. Guidelines for high risk autopsy. In: Hutchins GM, ed. Autopsy Performance and Reporting. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 1995: 94–97.Google Scholar
  6. International Union Against Cancer. Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, eds. TNM Supplement 1993: A Commentary on Uniform Use. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. International Union Against Cancer. Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 4th ed. (2nd rev.) Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.Google Scholar
  8. International Union Against Cancer. Spiessl B, Beahrs OH, Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Scheibe O, Sobin LH, Wagner G, eds. TNM Atlas: Illustrated Guide to the TNM/pTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 3rd ed. (2nd rev.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.Google Scholar
  9. Lowe DG, Jeffrey IJM. Surgical Pathology Techniques. Philadelphia, PA: BC Decker Inc.; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Markel SF, Hirsch SD. Synoptic surgical pathology reporting. Hum Pathol 1991; 22: 807–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Protection of Laboratory Workers From Infectious Disease Transmitted by Blood, Body Fluids, and Tissue. 2nd ed. NCCLS document M29–T2. Villanova, Pa: National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Richardson JM, Redford LK, Motton H, James R, Porterfield J. Protective garb. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosai J, Members of the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Standardized reporting of surgical pathology diagnoses for the major tumor types: a proposal. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993; 100: 240–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosai J, Bonfiglio TA, Corson JM, et al. Standardization of the surgical pathology report. Mod Pathol. 1992; 5: 197–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt WA. Principles and Techniques in Surgical Pa- thology. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Scully C, Samaranayake L, Martin M. HIV: answers to common questions on transmission, disinfection and antisepsis in clinical dentistry. Br Dent J. 1993; 175: 175–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. A Summary of Major Provisions of the Final Rule Implementing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Bloodborne Pathogens Regulation and Supplemental Information. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Surgical Pathology/Cytopathology Quality Assurance Manual. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Teloh HA. Methods in Surgical Pathology. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas; 1957.Google Scholar
  20. Travers H, Davey D, Cleary K, Tazelaar H, Minielly J, eds. Quality Improvement Manual in Anatomic Pathology. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph H. Hruban
    • 1
  • William H. Westra
    • 1
  • Timothy H. Phelps
    • 2
  • Christina Isacson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pathology Meyer 7-181The Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Art as Applied to Medicine, School of MedicineThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of PathologyVirginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations