Chemically Modified Ultrafiltration Membranes for Enzyme Fixation

  • Ulrike Artelt
  • Eberhard Staude


Ultrafiltration is a widely used and well established separation process in which asymmetric porous membranes are commonly applied. Many a textbook is listing the wide array of different applications in various branches of industry and gives extensive advice on membrane preparation and on the pros and cons of the various membrane polymers (Cheryan, 1986; Staude, 1992). Mostly, the synthetic polymers used as membrane materials are hydrophobic from their origin. Generally, this circumstance does not effect seriously the application of these types of membranes. Sometimes, however, intermolecular interactions between pol-ymer and substrate cause special problems that are referred to as fouling. Such interactions are exerted by hydrophobic forces yielding adsorption that can effectively be diminished by a chemical modification of the membrane material. This is best performed by introducing ionogenic substituents to the polymer. Due to this the hydrophobic character of the polymer becomes smaller and the adsorption is less pronounced. Such reactions sometimes cause a change to hydrophilic membranes. In any case such a chemical reaction presupposes that the polymer backbone remains intact, otherwise the polymer would lose its film-forming properties. Introducing ionogenic groups offers an additional advantage. A membrane bearing fixed charges can reject or attract solutes according to the respective sign of the matter to be ultrafiltered.


Effectiveness Factor Sulfonic Acid Group Ultrafiltration Membrane Upstream Side Ionogenic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alfani, F., Cantarella, M., and Greco, G., 1979, Theoretical and experimental analysis of a soluble enzyme membrane reactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 21:1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, S.A., and Burns, R.F., 1973, Reaktor separators incorporating membrane bound enzymes, Chem. Ind. 18:801.Google Scholar
  3. Basheer, S., Kut, O.M., Prenosil, J.E., and Bourne, J.R., 1993, Development of an enzyme membrane reactor for treatment of cyanide-containing wastewaters from the food industry, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 41:465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford, M.M., 1976, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding, Anal. Biochem. 72:248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterworth, T.A., Wang, D.J C., and Sinskey, A.J.., 1970, Application of ultrafiltration for enzyme retention during continuous enzymatic reaction, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 12:615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplan, S.R., Goldman, R., Silman, H.J., Kedem, O., and Katchalski, E., 1965, Papain membrane on a collodion matrix: preparation and enzymic behavior, Science 150:758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceynowa, J., and Adamczak, P., 1992, Enzyme membrane based upon polyamide-6 for oil hydrolysis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 46:749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheryan, M., 1986, “Ultrafiltration Handbook”, Technomic Publishing Comp. Inc. Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
  9. Coulet, P.R., 1992, Polymeric membranes and coupled enzymes in the design of biosensors, J. Membr. Sci. 68:217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Düputell, D., Staude, E., and Wyszynski, D., 1994, Sorption of human albumin and endotoxin on uncharged and charged ultrafiltration membranes made from polysulfone and polyethersulfone, Desalination 95:75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gille, M., and Staude, E., 1994,Symmetric enzyme distribution in asymmetric UF polysulfone membranes, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44:557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guiver, M.D., and Apsimon, J.W., 1988, The modification of polysulfone by metalation, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. 26:123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartmeier, W., 1986, “Immobilisierte Biokatalysatoren”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio.Google Scholar
  14. Hinke, E., and Staude, E., 1991, Streaming potential of microporous membranes made from homogeneously functionalized polysulfone, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 42:2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishimori, Y., Karube, I., and Suzuki, S., 1981, Mechanical control of the activity of glucose oxidase immobilized on porous polyvinylchloride membrane, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23:2601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Korus, R.A., and Olson, A.C., 1977, The use of a-galactosidase and invertase in hollow fiber reactors, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19:1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mita, D.G., Pecorella, M.A., Russo, P., Rossi, S., Canaglia, P., and Gaffete, F.S., 1993, Effect of temperature gradients on the activity of enzymes immobilized on natural polymeric matrices, J. Membr. Sci. 78:69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Noshay A. and Robeson L.M., 1976. Sulfonated polysulfone, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 20:1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Nyström, M. Pihlajamäki, A. Ehsani, N., 1994, Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements, J.. Membr. Sci. 87:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pronk, W., Kerkhof, P.J.A.M., van Helden, C., and van’t Riet, K., 1988, The hydrolysis of triglycerides by immobilized lipase in a hydrophilic membrane reactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32:512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodemann, K. and Staude, E., 1995, Preparation and characterization of porous polysulfone membranes with spacer-bonded N-containing groups, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. in press.Google Scholar
  22. Rodemam, K., and Staude, E., 1994, Synthesis and characterization of affinity membranes made from polysulfone, J. Membr. Sci. 88:271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt-Steffen, A., and Staude, E., 1992, Ultrafiltration membranes for chemical bonding of urease, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 39:725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwarz, S., Jacobasch, H.-J., Wyszynski, D., and Staude, E., 1994, Electrokinetic measurements on porous polysulfone membranes, Angew. Makromol. Chem. 221:165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Staude, E.. 1992, “Membranen und Membranprozesse”,VCH, Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Warshawsky, A., Deshe, A., and Gutman, N., 1984, Safe halomethylation of aromatic polymers via BCME free long chain haloalkylethers, Br. Polym. J.. 16:234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Warshawsky, A., Kahana, V., Deshe, A., Gottlieb, H.E., and Arad-Yellin, R., 1990, Halomethylated polysulfone: reactive intermediates to neutral and ionic film-forming polymers, J. Polym. Sci. A 28:2885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watanabe, E., Takagi, M., Takei, S., Hoshi, M., and Cao, S.-G., 1991, Development of biosensors for the simultaneous determination of sucrose and glucose, lactose and glucose, and starch and glucose, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38:99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wichmann, R., Wandrey, Ch., Bückmann, A.F., and Kula, M.-R., 1981, Continuous enzymatic transformation in an enzyme membrane reactor with simultaneous NAD(H) regeneration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23:2789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu, D.-R., Steven, M.C., and Belfort G., 1993, Kinetic resolution of racemic glycidyl butyrate using a multiphase membrane enzyme reactor: experiments and model verification, Biotechnol.Bioeng. 41:979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrike Artelt
    • 1
  • Eberhard Staude
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Technische ChemieUniversität EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations