Abstract
There are many reasons to combine expert assessments and opinions. To list a diversity of areas, where such combinations are relevant, one may think of the weather forecast at a particular location and time, the estimated yield of a natural resources exploration project, the reliability/risk of a new device or technology, the location of a new shopping centre or a waste disposal site, the real-time response of an expert system in a given situation, and so forth. As reflected by these examples, the words ‘expert’, ‘assessment’, and ‘opinion’ will be used here in the broadest possible sense. The aim of this chapter is to propose a unifying framework to analyse and solve problems of aggregating opinions in an objective, quantitatively established manner. The discussion draws on Pintér and Cooke (1987), providing model extensions, much improved solution methodology, and nontrivial numerical examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pintér, J.D. (1996). Aggregation of Negotiated Expert Opinions. In: Global Optimization in Action. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2502-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2502-5_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4751-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2502-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive